Re: Naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files?

[Miroslav Lachman]

Christian Weisgerber wrote on 2017/06/07 22:18:

What is the naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files installed
by ports?

Looking over the ports tree, I see that most adhere to the
NNN.*name* pattern also used in the base system, although it's
unclear how the NNN numbers are assigned and the rest of the name
is somewhat flexible.

The lone exception is sysutils/smartmontools, which installs
etc/periodic/daily/smart.


The numeric prefix is for ordering: 000 start as first, 999 last. 
Similar actions should be run consecutively. For example all daily 
status checks are numbered 4xx, all daily cleanups are 1xx.
So if some port installs periodic for cleanup it should be named 
1xx.name too.


The "name" is usually the port name, but some ports can install more 
than one periodic scripts or the name of the port is not so descriptive 
as some different name.


Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files?

[Douglas Thrift]

On 6/7/2017 1:18 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> What is the naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files installed
> by ports?
> 
> Looking over the ports tree, I see that most adhere to the
> NNN.*name* pattern also used in the base system, although it's
> unclear how the NNN numbers are assigned and the rest of the name
> is somewhat flexible.
> 
> The lone exception is sysutils/smartmontools, which installs
> etc/periodic/daily/smart.
> 

Just another data point, on my system there are two others:

/usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/dmidecode was installed by package
sysutils/dmidecode
/usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/sa-utils was installed by package
mail/sa-utils

-- 
Douglas William Thrift

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files?

[Matthew Seaman]

On 07/06/2017 16:18, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> What is the naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files installed
> by ports?
> 
> Looking over the ports tree, I see that most adhere to the
> NNN.*name* pattern also used in the base system, although it's
> unclear how the NNN numbers are assigned and the rest of the name
> is somewhat flexible.
> 
> The lone exception is sysutils/smartmontools, which installs
> etc/periodic/daily/smart.

The NNN.name pattern is just to provide some order or execution of the
periodic jobs.  So long as the script name is globally unique there's no
concern about having multiple jobs with the same numeric prefix, or no
numeric prefix at all.

Cheers,

Matthew




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files?

[Christian Weisgerber]

What is the naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files installed
by ports?

Looking over the ports tree, I see that most adhere to the
NNN.*name* pattern also used in the base system, although it's
unclear how the NNN numbers are assigned and the rest of the name
is somewhat flexible.

The lone exception is sysutils/smartmontools, which installs
etc/periodic/daily/smart.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PostgreSQL Updates in 2017Q2?

[Lacey Powers]

On 06/06/2017 04:00 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
> Aloha,
>
>> I noticed that ports head has had security updates for PostgreSQL 9.2 to
>> 9.6 since 11 May, but these haven't been merged into the 2017Q2
>> branch.The last batch of updates in February arrived into 2017Q2 the
>> same day as the official release, but it's been nearly 2 weeks since
>> this last update and they still seem to be missing from 2017Q2.
>>
>> Would it be possible to get these merged from head into the 2017Q2
>> branch?
>>
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=440628
>
> Its committed now! Sorry for the delay!
>
> Greetings,
> Torsten

No worries! =) Thank you!

Best,

Lacey

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD Port: firefox-53.0.3_1,1

[Ewout Boks]

Hi,

I tried building Firefox today and got stuck with this error:

/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-53.0.3/obj-x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1/dist/include/js/RootingAPI.h:837:5:
error: 'JS::Rooted::Rooted(const JS::Rooted&) [with T =
JSObject*]' is private
 Rooted(const Rooted&) = delete;

and

/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-53.0.3/obj-x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1/dist/include/js/RootingAPI.h:837:5:
note: declared here
 Rooted(const Rooted&) = delete;


my system:

FreeBSD kariba.hanese.nl 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #2 r280430: Tue
Mar 24 13:56:43 CET 2015
r...@kariba.hanese.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AUCKLAND  amd64

perhaps you know how to fix this?

With best regards,

Ewout Boks






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

paper backup - public C code for MS not UX so far.

[Julian H. Stacey]

Hi ports@ 
It might amuse someone to port this, it's in C for MS at present.
http://ollydbg.de/Paperbak/#1
Article & discussion here:
https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-paper-data-storage-option/
I'm not asking for it to be ported, just it's not in our ports/
& may interest some.

PS a while back there was discussion of paper back up of encryption keys:
gnupg-us...@gnupg.org 
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, BSD Linux Unix Systems Engineer
 Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable.
 http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes  Starve a troll: Ignore Trump's tweets.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Status of lang/gcc5-aux and lang/gcc6-aux on FreeBSD-current?

[Thomas Mueller]

What is the status of gcc-aux (5 and 6) on FreeBSD-current following the 
introduction of 64-bit inodes?

It was broken, so I read from the emailing list, but is it still broken?

No indication of being broken in PORTSDIR/lang/gcc6-aux or gcc5-aux.



Tom

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"