Re: This application failed to start because it could not find or load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in ""
Solved: Overlooked to downgrade two qt5 packages. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
This application failed to start because it could not find or load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in ""
The recent update of the qt5* ports puzzled some things, could not update cause of qt5-networking is broken with__libressl. I reverted the partial update. After this I got this error: This application failed to start because it could not find or load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in "". Problem withvlc and xpdf (maybe, with some more). Vlc and xpdf core-dumps on start. Does anybody know how to fix this? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Packaging failures with devel/gvfs, devel/gnome-vfs
On 18 May 2018 at 23:34, Jonathan Chenwrote: > Hi, > > On STABLE-11/amd64, with the ports tree at r470283, I am seeing > packaging errors for gvfs and gnome-vfs when running synth: [...] With the latest update to samba46, the configure phase for devel/gvfs and devel/gnome-vfs does *NOT* pick up Samba support, even when --enable-samba is set. For gvfs, the logs indicate: gvfs configuration summary: gio module directory : ${exec_prefix}/lib/gio/modules hotplug backend: hal Blu-ray metadata support: no Google support: yes HTTP/WebDAV support: yes Samba support:no ... -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > Sorry, this was my fault and I hope it is fixed with the follow-up commit > to portmaster version 3.19-10. Thanks! Works for me now. -- meta___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
On 18 May 2018 at 11:20, Kurt Jaegerwrote: > Hi! > >> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify >> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, >> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is >> customarily attributed. > >> >>> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a >> >>> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers >> >>> and committers. > >> >> One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect >> >> "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default >> >> template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places. > >> > How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is >> > there a related bug I should file against services? > >> Its a client side patch of the subversion binary. I'm not sure the >> best way to handle it beyond perhaps changing the template a bit? > > What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ? My point is that the custom patch pre-fills the field, which is why submitters often see it filled when they don't expect it: the committer doesn't do it by hand. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
On 2018/05/18 07:38, John W. O'Brien wrote: > On 2018/05/18 00:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify >>> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, >>> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is >>> customarily attributed. >> >> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a >> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers >> and committers. >> > > Thank you. I will prepare a patch. It seems like it should be against > the Committers' Guide [0], though. Also, since this would apply to trees > besides ports, is there a venue besides this list where I should solicit > feedback? > > [0] > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.html#commit-log-message > Patch away [0]! [0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/228353 -- John W. O'Brien OpenPGP keys: 0x33C4D64B895DBF3B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:46:15 +0200 Stefan Esserwrote: > I'm working on a completely new re-implementation of portmaster and > the new version will get these points right. Fixing the current port > version is too hard and wasted effort, since only the features and > command line options are carried over, but none of the code of the > current version. Thanks! I see code, take parts frome there for my work purposes and old portmaster have bad design. As one more future request. Current pkg create use only one thread to compress. I do small set of benchmarks on Ryzen 2700x: root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h pkg create --format tar -o /tmp/ llvm60 7.01s real 6.11s user 0.72s sys 796,5 MB root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h pkg create --format tbz -o /tmp/ llvm60 1m3.56s real1m1.48s user0.38s sys 209,9 MB root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h pkg create --format tgz -o /tmp/ llvm60 36.54s real 35.10s user 0.48s sys 244,8 MB root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h pkg create --format txz -o /tmp/ llvm60 5m42.69s real 5m33.15s user 0.53s sys 154,7 MB root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h pbzip2 -k -p16 /tmp/llvm60-6.0.0_3.tar 7.47s real 1m40.36s user 5.34s sys 210,7 MB root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h tar --use-compress-program=pigz -cf /tmp/llvm60-6.0.0_3.tar.gz /tmp/llvm60-6.0.0_3.tar 2.85s real 40.44s user 0.75s sys 244,6 MB root@rimwks# /usr/bin/time -h xz -T 0 --compress /tmp/llvm60-6.0.0_3.tar 49.96s real 9m30.88s user 33.84s sys 156,9 MB 5m42.69s - for compress, compile time ~ 15 minutes. Terrable!!! 49.96s - is mutch better. Can you try to implement option to chose at least tar/txz, and probably for txz use "xz -T 0 --compress" ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
Am 18.05.18 um 22:17 schrieb Rozhuk Ivan: > On Fri, 18 May 2018 20:30:38 +0200 > Stefan Esserwrote: > >> Sorry, this was my fault and I hope it is fixed with the follow-up >> commit to portmaster version 3.19-10. >> > > Sorry for offtopic, but if portmaster install some build dep or run dep > if does not mark it as autoinstalled, and: > pkg query -e '%a = 0' %o > show autotools, help2man and other build only crap as user install it, > pkg autoremove > does not remove this. > > Also --delete-build-only broken. > > portmaster -BgvDa -y --delete-build-only > --local-packagedir=/usr/ports/packages --packages-local > if found some package - install it, and after install create package and > overwrite original. > pkg create -n will prevent this, or additional checks, or just keep remember > that pkg allready > exist because port just installed from it. I'm working on a completely new re-implementation of portmaster and the new version will get these points right. Fixing the current port version is too hard and wasted effort, since only the features and command line options are carried over, but none of the code of the current version. The current port master port was written at the time of the "old" package management tools (pre PKG-NG). It took me quite some time and effort to implement flavors support in that version, and I found that it is much harder to maintain that version than to rewrite it with the current package tools in mind. The new version is already able to upgrade ports, but it lacks some of the features of the old version (e.g. installation from local packages). But it is already better at tracking changes, e.g. as in the recent KDE4 port and package renaming (where both port directory and package name were changed at the same time and the current portmaster in ports has no way to track this change and to upgrade the affected ports). But I'm not going to implement all features of the current portmaster. E.g. I have no plan to implement dependency tracking via the INDEX file or the installation of packages from a remote repository (since mixing locally compiled and official packages is not well supported). But I plan to offer the installation of build dependencies from locally cached packages (and the deinstallation after they are no longer required). But the use case you described in your mail will be covered. I hope to have the new version ready for testing as a portmaster-devel port before the end of June. Regards, STefan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
On 5/18/18 14:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify >> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, >> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is >> customarily attributed. > > This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a > patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers > and committers. > One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places. > >>> How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is >>> there a related bug I should file against services? > >> Its a client side patch of the subversion binary. I'm not sure the >> best way to handle it beyond perhaps changing the template a bit? > > What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ? > > The custom patch is here: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/subversion/files/extra-patch-fbsd-template?revision=411397=markup I agree that this won't necessarily need to change. If anything, a very small reminder to committers, or suggestive wording change, to fix-up the the sponsorship line when applicable. I will submit a separate bug with a candidate change that depends on the doc bug. I won't mind if the doc bug is accepted and the subversion portbug is closed WONTFIX upon review. -- John W. O'Brien OpenPGP keys: 0x33C4D64B895DBF3B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
On Fri, 18 May 2018 20:30:38 +0200 Stefan Esserwrote: > Sorry, this was my fault and I hope it is fixed with the follow-up > commit to portmaster version 3.19-10. > Sorry for offtopic, but if portmaster install some build dep or run dep if does not mark it as autoinstalled, and: pkg query -e '%a = 0' %o show autotools, help2man and other build only crap as user install it, pkg autoremove does not remove this. Also --delete-build-only broken. portmaster -BgvDa -y --delete-build-only --local-packagedir=/usr/ports/packages --packages-local if found some package - install it, and after install create package and overwrite original. pkg create -n will prevent this, or additional checks, or just keep remember that pkg allready exist because port just installed from it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
Thanks, fixes problem for me. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
Am 18.05.18 um 17:13 schrieb Koichiro Iwao: > Hi, > > I'm building devel/qt5-make by portmaster. Somehow portmaster incorrectly > detects gcc6 and uses g++ despite it is actually installed as g++6. If I > > build it without portmaster, clang++ is used and build finishes successfully. Sorry, this was my fault and I hope it is fixed with the follow-up commit to portmaster version 3.19-10. I had received a proposed patch to significantly speed-up portmaster by caching of a few parameters in environment variables. My commit was meant to work around a side effect of the proposed patch (sourcing of a script imported several unused subroutines into portmaster and I wanted to just use the result of execution of the one relevant subroutine, but missed the fact that the quoting came out wrong ...). (If you are interested: The environment variable _CXXINTERNAL_acaad9ca should contain the literal character sequence "-lc++" including the double quotes, when I use eval as in the defective version, I either get no quotes around -lc++ or I get extra double-quotes around the whole variable, if I eval the script output piped through sed s:":\\:" ...) Since I did not manage to get the correct result without sourcing the script, I gave in and accept the fact, that these subroutines are now imported into portmaster. Anyway, I hope my latest commit has fixed the problem ... Regards, STefan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
Hi! > The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify > "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, > in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is > customarily attributed. > >>> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a > >>> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers > >>> and committers. > >> One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect > >> "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default > >> template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places. > > How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is > > there a related bug I should file against services? > Its a client side patch of the subversion binary. I'm not sure the > best way to handle it beyond perhaps changing the template a bit? What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ? The custom patch is here: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/subversion/files/extra-patch-fbsd-template?revision=411397=markup -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
On 18 May 2018 at 04:40, John W. O'Brienwrote: > On 2018/05/18 00:43, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 17 May 2018 at 21:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> Hi! >>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is customarily attributed. >>> >>> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a >>> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers >>> and committers. >> >> One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect >> "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default >> template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places. >> > > How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is > there a related bug I should file against services? Its a client side patch of the subversion binary. I'm not sure the best way to handle it beyond perhaps changing the template a bit? -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: help2man fails to build saying p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found
OK, reextraction of the ports tree with "portsnap extract" helped. Looks like my suspicion was right and ===> Registering installation for help2man-1.47.6 the port got trough. I havent done any clean operations, like you suggested. Maybe that would have helped too, but I think that in that case the problem would manifestate itself somehow differently. On Fri, 18 May 2018 17:35:07 +0200 Lars Schottewrote: > Yes, I ll try that, but first I did extract the ports tree again, > because this looks suspiciously, I noticed that on a jail it had > built, so it may have something to do with my ports tree that I > updated maybe too often. > > On Fri, 18 May 2018 16:48:52 +0200 > Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > > Sometimes the depends are not proper cleaned and "make clean > > depends" helps. > > > > ___ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > -- Lars Schotte Mudroňova 13 92101 Piešťany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
I got another error with portmaster and qt5-qmake: qt5-qmake /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version CXXABI_1.3.8 required by /ram/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/bin/qmake not found but works in the port. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: help2man fails to build saying p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found
Yes, I ll try that, but first I did extract the ports tree again, because this looks suspiciously, I noticed that on a jail it had built, so it may have something to do with my ports tree that I updated maybe too often. On Fri, 18 May 2018 16:48:52 +0200 Walter Schwarzenfeldwrote: > Sometimes the depends are not proper cleaned and "make clean depends" > helps. > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Lars Schotte Mudroňova 13 92101 Piešťany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Why portmaster uses g++ not g++6 nor clang++?
Hi, I'm building devel/qt5-make by portmaster. Somehow portmaster incorrectly detects gcc6 and uses g++ despite it is actually installed as g++6. If I build it without portmaster, clang++ is used and build finishes successfully. $ pkg info | grep gcc gcc-ecj-4.5Eclipse Java Compiler used to build GCC Java gcc6-6.4.0_7 GNU Compiler Collection 6 gcc6-aux-20170802_1Version of GCC 6 with full Ada support gccmakedep-1.0.3 Create dependencies in makefiles using 'gcc -M' # portmaster devel/qt5-qmake (snip) ===> License LGPL21 accepted by the user ===> qt5-qmake-5.10.1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by qt5-qmake-5.10.1 for building ===> Extracting for qt5-qmake-5.10.1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for KDE/Qt/5.10.1/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1.tar.xz. ===> Patching for qt5-qmake-5.10.1 ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt5/files/extrapatch-configure ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt5/files/extrapatch-mkspecs_features_create__cmake.prf ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt5/files/extrapatch-mkspecs_features_qt__module.prf ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt5/files/extrapatch-mkspecs_common_bsd_bsd.conf ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for qt5-qmake-5.10.1 /usr/bin/sed -i "" -e "/DEFAULT_LIBDIRS=/ s,\"n,n/usr/local/lib&," /ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/configure ===> qt5-qmake-5.10.1 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> qt5-qmake-5.10.1 depends on package: pkgconf>=1.3.0_1 - found ===> qt5-qmake-5.10.1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> qt5-qmake-5.10.1 depends on executable: gcc6 - found ===> qt5-qmake-5.10.1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/as - found ===> Configuring for qt5-qmake-5.10.1 /bin/mkdir -p /ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1 echo 'CMAKE_MODULE_TESTS = -' > /ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/.qmake.cache echo 'QMAKE_LIBDIR_FLAGS = -L/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/lib' >> /ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/.qmake.cache Creating qmake... ===> Building for qt5-qmake-5.10.1 gmake[1]: Entering directory '/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake' g++ -c -o main.o -std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -g -g -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake/library -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake/generators -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake/generators/unix -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake/generators/win32 -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake/generators/mac -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/include -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/include/QtCore -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/include/QtCore/5.10.1 -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/include/QtCore/5.10.1/QtCore -I../src/corelib/global -I/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ -DQT_VERSION_STR=\"5.10.1\" -DQT_VERSION_MAJOR=5 -DQT_VERSION_MINOR=10 -DQT_VERSION_PATCH=1 -DQT_BUILD_QMAKE -DQT_BOOTSTRAPPED -DPROEVALUATOR_FULL -DQT_NO_FOREACH /ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake/main.cpp gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/ssd/tmp/ports/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.1/qmake' ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 # make -C /usr/ports/devel/qt5-make -> builds successfully using clang++ -- meta ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: help2man fails to build saying p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found
Sometimes the depends are not proper cleaned and "make clean depends" helps. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
help2man fails to build saying p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found
Hi, I am trying to build /usr/ports/mail/opensmtpd and it fails on: /usr/ports/mail/opensmtpd # make BATCH=yes install ===> opensmtpd-5.9.2p1_6,1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.43 - found ===> opensmtpd-5.9.2p1_6,1 depends on shared library: libevent.so - not found ===> libevent-2.1.8_1 depends on executable: autoconf-2.69 - not found ===> autoconf-2.69_1 depends on executable: gm4 - not found ===> m4-1.4.18,1 depends on executable: makeinfo - not found ===> texinfo-6.5,1 depends on executable: help2man - not found ===> help2man-1.47.6 depends on package: p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found ===> help2man-1.47.6 depends on package: p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found *** Error code 1 Stop. make[5]: stopped in /usr/ports/misc/help2man *** Error code 1 Stop. make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/texinfo *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/m4 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/autoconf *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/libevent *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/mail/opensmtpd and help2man itself also: /usr/ports/misc/help2man # make BATCH=yes install ===> help2man-1.47.6 depends on package: p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found ===> help2man-1.47.6 depends on package: p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/misc/help2man Lately I am getting strange results, like when I do make install somewhere it stops with $? == 0. And does nothing. Is it possible that my ports tree got somehow corrupted or sth? I am using portsnap to keep it in sync. Thanks. -- Lars Schotte Mudroňova 13 92101 Piešťany ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
On 2018/05/18 00:43, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 17 May 2018 at 21:15, Kurt Jaegerwrote: >> Hi! >> >>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify >>> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, >>> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is >>> customarily attributed. >> >> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a >> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers >> and committers. > > One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect > "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default > template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places. > How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is there a related bug I should file against services? -- John W. O'Brien OpenPGP keys: 0x33C4D64B895DBF3B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages
On 2018/05/18 00:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify >> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, >> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is >> customarily attributed. > > This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a > patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers > and committers. > Thank you. I will prepare a patch. It seems like it should be against the Committers' Guide [0], though. Also, since this would apply to trees besides ports, is there a venue besides this list where I should solicit feedback? [0] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.html#commit-log-message -- John W. O'Brien OpenPGP keys: 0x33C4D64B895DBF3B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Packaging failures with devel/gvfs, devel/gnome-vfs
Hi, On STABLE-11/amd64, with the ports tree at r470283, I am seeing packaging errors for gvfs and gnome-vfs when running synth: ===> Building package for gvfs-1.26.3_9 pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gvfs/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/gvfsd-smb:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gvfs/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/gvfsd-smb-browse:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gvfs/work/stage/usr/local/share/GConf/gsettings/gvfs-smb.convert:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gvfs/work/stage/usr/local/share/gvfs/mounts/smb-browse.mount:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gvfs/work/stage/usr/local/share/gvfs/mounts/smb.mount:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gvfs/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.system.smb.gschema.xml:No such file or d irectory *** Error code 1 ===> Building package for gnome-vfs-2.24.4_8 pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gnome-vfs/work/stage/usr/local/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/smb-module.conf:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gnome-vfs/work/stage/usr/local/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.a:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gnome-vfs/work/stage/usr/local/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.la:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /construction/xports/devel/gnome-vfs/work/stage/usr/local/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so:No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Anyone else seeing this? -- Jonathan Chen___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"