Re: Building math/octave with QT4?

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:32:28AM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > On 06/12/2018 04:20 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:28:07PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > >> > >> Or if you just send him a request without a patch, he may get > >> around to it sometime.

Re: Building math/octave with QT4?

2018-06-12 Thread Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
On 06/12/2018 04:20 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:28:07PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: >> >> Or if you just send him a request without a patch, he may get >> around to it sometime. > > This seems to work. > > cd /usr/ports > svn merge -r 469260:469259 . > What

Re: Building math/octave with QT4?

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:28:07PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > > Or if you just send him a request without a patch, he may get > around to it sometime. This seems to work. cd /usr/ports svn merge -r 469260:469259 . -- Steve ___

Re: Building math/octave with QT4?

2018-06-12 Thread Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
Sorry for top posting, but I am using Outlook to reply. You should really send this request to the maintainer, because he could have very easily overlooked this email. He is step...@freebsd.org. If you submit a PR with a patch, preferably one which uses options to let the user decide

Building math/octave with QT4?

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Kargl
Is it possible to build math/octave with QT4? The recent switch to require QT5 in r469260 leads to an unusable octave (unless one's intention is to debug QT5). % gdb81 /usr/local/libexec/octave/4.4.0/exec/amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0/octave-gui octave-gui.core > bt #0 0x0002056b244d in

SSL issues

2018-06-12 Thread The Doctor
Mjor heads up. FYI LibreSSL is stil openssl 1.0.1 compliant OPenssl 1.0.2 is widely gainingg acceptance. OPenssl 1.1 is out there but there is resistance. I have been notice ports with OPenssl 1.1 incompliency. I have worked with BIND , EXIM and INN , Apache and Proftpd and Postgresql,

Re: bind911 fatal error with LMDB and allow-new-zones in chrooted environment

2018-06-12 Thread Mathieu Arnold
Hi, On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Ciernik Tomas wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing fatal error during start after upgrading bind99 to > bind911. > > I used soon-to-be-EOL bind99 in chrooted environment with support for > dynamically adding of zones. With upgrade to bind911 I