Re: net/ntopng: version jump by an order of magnitude
On 20/09/2018 6:40 am, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > > Small question: > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commit/0585180d > > ... has a typo in the version number which was an ISO date > originally. Are we using this new date format now or is there > going to be a PORTEPOCH amendment? Up to the maintainer ultimately. To avoid PORTEPOCH, either the typo'd datestamp scheme (0XX for month) would need to continue until 3.7, or an alternate scheme created that is both meaningful and > than (pkg version -t old new) the current value. Or fix the typo and add PORTEPOCH. Personally, I'd go the first option as it's only a minor typo that doesn't affect ongoing existing-scheme version updates, and is the more transient of the two (PORTEPOCH lives forever, bad scheme only lasts till 3.7). > > Cheers, > Franco > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
net/ntopng: version jump by an order of magnitude
Hi, Small question: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commit/0585180d ... has a typo in the version number which was an ISO date originally. Are we using this new date format now or is there going to be a PORTEPOCH amendment? Cheers, Franco ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
graphics/php*-gd requires X11 by default
FYI - I received an email from the maintainer of this port - he will resolve this later. Thanks all. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, the wise RW via freebsd-ports wrote: I presume that's because you use a restricted set of packages. Without flavor support portupgrade can't always get the port directory from the origin. The are currently 782 ports installed on this system. Didn't have much difficulties with flavors yet. That said "in the next few weeks" last year. I know but developers time is limited. Important thing is that portupgrade generally still works. -- Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function. -- Garrison Keillor ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, the wise Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > This discussion of portmaster prompts me to ask, what is the status > > of portupgrade? > > > > I used portupgrade at first but subsequently switched to > > portmaster. > > I still use portupgrade daily and it works fine. I presume that's because you use a restricted set of packages. Without flavor support portupgrade can't always get the port directory from the origin. > Afaik the maintainer > is adding support for flavors into portupgrade but I don't know the > status of it: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-December/111445.html That said "in the next few weeks" last year. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster
Hi! > Why is Ada only available on i386/amd64? Because nobody provided fixes for the build on other platforms up to now. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, the wise Thomas Mueller wrote: This discussion of portmaster prompts me to ask, what is the status of portupgrade? I used portupgrade at first but subsequently switched to portmaster. I still use portupgrade daily and it works fine. Afaik the maintainer is adding support for flavors into portupgrade but I don't know the status of it: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-December/111445.html Regards, Marco -- There are three reasons for becoming a writer: the first is that you need the money; the second that you have something to say that you think the world should know; the third is that you can't think what to do with the long winter evenings. -- Quentin Crisp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster
Excerpt from STefan Esser: > I have been using a portmaster-rewrite for many months, which is ready > for release except for some performance tuning. (The portmaster in ports > is not un-maintainable, but it's hard to modify a monolithic 4000 line > shell script that uses global variables to pass state and recursive > invocation of itself to provide local state when required.) > The performance problems are caused by bad design of the FLAVOR feature, > which ignored the requirements of tools like portmaster (I've written > about this at length when FLAVOR support had been committed). > Synth is a non-starter for me, since it is written in Ada and only > available on i386/amd64. I have plans to implement the functionality > of synth in portmaster (not really hard, since the complex parts are > the logic that deals with moved ports and conflicts, while the actual > port building is simple). Portmaster can already create packages > without installing them (unless they are BUILD_DEPENDS of some later > port, of course) and you can populate your local repository with > portmaster. > Different from poudriere or synth, portmaster adapts to the preferences > of the user (and e.g. upgrades samba48 used by some port that specifies > a dependency on samba46, if the system already has an outdated samba48 > installed). > Portmaster will use what's available on a system and does allow selective > upgrades (keeping some ports at a back-level on purpose, but still upgrade > other ports that depend on them), while a poudirere/pkg based upgrade will > typically require all dependencies to exactly match what was present at > the time the package was built (in a clean environment, not resembling the > system the packages are going to be installed on). Why is Ada only available on i386/amd64? I don't think gcc is so limited. Or is it an idiosyncrasy of Dragonlace? This discussion of portmaster prompts me to ask, what is the status of portupgrade? I used portupgrade at first but subsequently switched to portmaster. On this computer, synth crashes, sometimes making the system crash. But I am in NetBSD as I type this. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ devel/ace | 6.4.3 | 6.5.2 +-+ devel/ace+tao-doc | 6.4.3 | 6.5.2 +-+ net-mgmt/nagvis | 1.9.9 | 1.9.10 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
