ports/arj build failing on -current

Is anyone else seeing this? My in-jail build fails with .. (msgbind aborts) gmake[3]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/archivers/arj/work/arj-3.10.22' cc -DARJUTIL -c -Ifreebsd13.0 -I./freebsd13.0/en/rs -I. -O2 -pipe -march=penryn -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -DLOCALE=LANG_en

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

[I found that the vintage of cmake matters: 3.12 and earlier work differently. Details later.] On 2019-Aug-7, at 14:37, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2019-Aug-7, at 13:58, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:42:26PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2019-Aug-7, at 12:56,

Re: Clamav

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Florian Smeets via freebsd-ports wrote: > On 7. Aug 2019, at 04:02, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > > > On 7/08/2019 7:57 am, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > >> Wehen Will clamav be updated? > >> I understand there is a security issue? > > > > The best

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On 2019-Aug-7, at 13:58, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:42:26PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2019-Aug-7, at 12:56, Brooks Davis wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:42:26PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-7, at 12:56, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On 2019-Aug-7, at 12:56, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> [I found something known to be missing

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>> [I found something known to be missing in the >>> in at least some versions of >>>

www/luakit: dropping maintainership

Hello, I moved on and I don't have the time and actually no freebsd system anymore to maintain the www/luakit port. There is still an update to the current version in bugzilla with minor issues. I'm dropping maintenance. If someone is going to pick it up and has questions, feel free to ask!

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > [I found something known to be missing in the > > in at least some versions of > > llvm/cmake/modules/CrossCompile.cmake that messes > > up the overall handling of

Re: Clamav

On 7. Aug 2019, at 04:02, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > On 7/08/2019 7:57 am, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: >> Wehen Will clamav be updated? >> I understand there is a security issue? > > The best / most effective method to report/request security releases or > updates is in Bugzilla, I've

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > [I found something known to be missing in the > in at least some versions of > llvm/cmake/modules/CrossCompile.cmake that messes > up the overall handling of LLVM_ENABLE_Z3_SOLVER .] > > On 2019-Aug-6, at 20:23, Mark Millard wrote:

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On 7/08/2019 6:16 pm, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me that I should be able to make a diff (example 3.1). If someone confirms that I really should not be able to make a diff, I will update the handbook appropriately. New ports should

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:16:13 + Kralj Karlo wrote: > Jonathan Chen writes: > > Details can be found at: > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html > > > > I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me > that I should be

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

Hi! > I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me that > I should be able to make a diff (example 3.1). If someone confirms that > I really should not be able to make a diff, I will update the handbook > appropriately. New ports should be submitted as shar. Changes to

Re: Xtide Broken - Unfetchable

committed with https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=508295 W.S. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"