I'm preparing a diff for this, and will let you know once it is ready
for testing.
mfg Tobias
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 06:12, Tobias C. Berner wrote:
>
> Moin moin
>
> From my side, I don't see a reason to have it split either. If there
> is no reason for the split for users, and only causes hassle, I don't
> see why the ports should remain split.
>
> My suggestion would be to just merge everything into one port, that is
> functional and gives you avidemux as a whole, usable package.
>
>
> mfg Tobias
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 23:46, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 24 May 2020 09:56:39 -0700 Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com said
> >
> > > Perhaps the avidemux port should be renamed to avidemux-libs, and then a
> > > new avidemux meta-port could be created with basically just an OPTIONS
> > > screen where your pick which parts you want installed?
> > +1 for that.
> > I was going to propose making a meta-port called "avidemux" with options
> > that pull only what's required to create a functional port. But decided
> > to wait till I got through all my mail first, in case someone as (at least)
> > as smart as I am beat me to the proposal. ;-)
> >
> > --Chris
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Freddie
> > >
> > > Typos due to smartphone keyboard.
> > > ___
> > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
> >
> > ___
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
