Hi,
Yes I will be fixing that in a new patch. The yadm tool has seen a new
update just
the other day so I'll merge this patch and the update into one ticket and
skip
messing with having to bump the PORTREVISION for that port.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > A
Hi!
> > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli
> > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be
> > the
> > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm
> > to allow for Jinja2 template files.
>
>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Greg Veldman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:43:38PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > The real question is: Will we design things in a way that we expect ports
> > tree users to always install git and its dependencies on their system or
> > not (long
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:21 PM Steve Wills wrote:
> On 8/10/20 9:28 AM, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> >
> > I'm probably fine with this and I think that all of the (now) supported
> > methods have pros and cons.
> > To leverage the UX flaws
Hi!
> A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli
> (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the
> maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm
> to allow for Jinja2 template files.
Committed,
Michael Gmelin writes:
> There are many users who never create any patches, but simply use
> the ports tree to install software.
Add my name to that list.
(Used to use cvsup ... now subversion ... soon git ... where will
the insanity end? :-) )
> On 10. Aug 2020, at 16:22, Steve Wills wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 8/10/20 9:28 AM, Lars Engels wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>> I'm probably fine with this and I think that all of the (now) supported
>> methods have pros and cons.
>> To leverage the UX
Hi,
On 8/10/20 9:28 AM, Lars Engels wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
I'm probably fine with this and I think that all of the (now) supported
methods have pros and cons.
To leverage the UX flaws of git and svn(lite) compared to portsnap
having a wrapper script
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>
> We are planning to deprecate use of portsnap in ports.
>
> The reasons are as follows (in no particular order):
>
> * Portsnap doesn't support quarterly branches, even years after
> quarterly branches were created and changed to
Hello,
A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the
maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm to
allow for Jinja2 template files.
signature.asc
вс, 9 авг. 2020 г. в 16:30, Pavel Timofeev :
>
> Pavel Timofeev :
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I'd like to take advantage of net/microsocks port - a small SOCKSv5
>> server.
>> It's v1.0.1 (https://github.com/rofl0r/microsocks/tree/v1.0.1) under
>> 12.1 RELEASE amd64.
>> It works OK with firefox until I ask
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
12 matches
Mail list logo
