On 2021-03-26 15:18, Olivier Certner wrote:
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021, 22:43:12 CET Chris a écrit :
Honestly. If something "just works", isn't a "security risk". Than don't
fix
it!
Not so simple... But for build-only dependencies, I concur.
But anyway, all new security reports for 3.x will
* Bob Eager [20210326 20:22]:
> Felix Palmen wrote:
> > I don't get what you mean. Repo details? A URL.
>
> With portsnap, I don't need a URL. It's built in. And that would be
> nice.
Ever had a look in /etc/portsnap.conf? Although it only wants a server
name (well, mu
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021, 22:43:12 CET Chris a écrit :
> Honestly. If something "just works", isn't a "security risk". Than don't fix
> it!
Not so simple... But for build-only dependencies, I concur.
But anyway, all new security reports for 3.x will be fixed in Tauthon. I've
now already
On 2021-03-26 12:19, Dan Mahoney (Ports) wrote:
More thoughts on mailman, specifically:
So, I just went to find an old FB post I made about mailman 2.x:
===
From the "Load Bearing Bit" department:
Pretty much the entire world is stuck using an EOL'd mailing list manager
(mailman
2.x),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:30:03 +0100
Felix Palmen wrote:
> * Bob Eager [20210326 14:27]:
> > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:04:17 +0100
> > Felix Palmen wrote:
> > > I never used portsnap, but I'd assume net/gitup should serv
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:55:15 -0500
Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On Friday, 26 March 2021 14:19:20 CDT Dan Mahoney (Ports) wrote:
> > More thoughts on mailman, specifically:
> >
> > So, I just went to find an old FB post I made about mailman 2.x:
> >
> > ===
> > From the "Load Bearing
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:06:08 -0700
Chris wrote:
> > I doubt that meaning of overlay is going to be relevant. I'd not
> > heard of it either, but from looking in ports/Mk/ it seems to be a
> > way of modifying port builds.
> As I understand it. It allows you to graft out-of-tree ports/versions
On Friday, 26 March 2021 14:19:20 CDT Dan Mahoney (Ports) wrote:
> More thoughts on mailman, specifically:
>
> So, I just went to find an old FB post I made about mailman 2.x:
>
> ===
> From the "Load Bearing Bit" department:
> Pretty much the entire world is stuck using an EOL'd mailing
More thoughts on mailman, specifically:
So, I just went to find an old FB post I made about mailman 2.x:
===
From the "Load Bearing Bit" department:
Pretty much the entire world is stuck using an EOL'd mailing list manager
(mailman 2.x), which depends on an EOL'd python (2.7).
This
## Felix Palmen (fe...@palmen-it.de):
> I'd assume (someone may correct me) that portsnap will still be
> supported,
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119098.html
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
___
* Bob Eager [20210326 14:27]:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:04:17 +0100
> Felix Palmen wrote:
> > I never used portsnap, but I'd assume net/gitup should serve the same
> > usecase.
> >
>
> Probably. So would git.
Only that net/gitup is very lightweight and doesn't u
On 2021-03-26 08:44, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:55:33 +1100 (EST)
Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, George Mitchell wrote:
>> [...] it is really not for everybody to use overlays in current
>> state (overlays are poor documented at least). [...]
>
> Until this
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:55:33 +1100 (EST)
Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, George Mitchell wrote:
>
> >> [...] it is really not for everybody to use overlays in current
> >> state (overlays are poor documented at least). [...]
> >
> > Until this thread I had never heard of them.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:04:17 +0100
Felix Palmen wrote:
> * Bob Eager [20210326 09:22]:
> > Thanks for this. The documentation (although introductory) is quite
> > detailed. What would be useful is just to note down the exact
* Bob Eager [20210326 09:22]:
> Thanks for this. The documentation (although introductory) is quite
> detailed. What would be useful is just to note down the exact
> replacement for:
>
> portsnap fetch
> portsnap extract
I never used portsnap, but I'd assume net/gitup sho
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:56:03 -0400
Ed Maste wrote:
> When the conversion is complete, Subversion will become read-only with
> no further updates to the ports tree. If you are fetching ports using
> svn, you will need to switch to the new git repository at the
> following URLS:
>
> Web
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:25:40 -0400
Janos Dohanics wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a laptop with FreeBSD 13.0-RC2 amd64 GENERIC 1300139
> 210a1aa0399bb8edf2d74f13171a400c613bee80 and a fully updated ports
> tree.
>
> I get an error when building multimedia/gstreamer1:
>
> # make
On 2021-03-25 22:24, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Why does our work have so little value that portmgr@ is unwilling
to keep us all in the loop, or consider our opinions on such matters?
The portmgr@ role is a huge task and all the reasons (limited time,
dayjobs, etc) ares valid for those folks
18 matches
Mail list logo
