Hi all,
I've been following the discussion about the git upgrade to the ports
repro but am not clear about how it impacts my use case.
At the moment I track ports on the revision that the Freebsd build
cluster uses to build the "latest" package set. I take the currently
reported latest build rev
Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
Sat Apr 3 20:35:46 UTC 2021 :
> * Mark Millard via freebsd-ports [20210403
> 10:02]:
> > Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
> > > There was an announcement to deprecate it, but it's still built with
> >
* Mark Millard via freebsd-ports [20210403 10:02]:
> Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
> > There was an announcement to deprecate it, but it's still built with
> > releng/13 so far, and I'd be surprised if the snapshots for it wouldn't
> > be availab
On 03/04/21 18:10, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote:
It is not good. The last was I did red was "portsnap" stay still for
awhile. I am portsnap and portmaster user for years. Where should I
find information what will happened with /usr/ports. Will gitup just
replace, update? I am using FreeBSD 13
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:10:33PM -0400, LuMiWa wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:51:29 -0600
> The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
> > freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > > On 03/04
Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
Fri Apr 2 22:49:58 UTC 2021 :
> * Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports [20210403
> 00:35]:
> > On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > but I use pkg/portsnap .
> > >
> > > How does that affect us?
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:51:29 -0600
The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
> freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM
On 03/04/21 13:50, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:43:49AM -0400, Carmel wrote:
> I am using "poudriere-devel", version 3.3.99.20210303_1 on a FreeBSD
> 11.4-RELEASE-p8 amd64 machine. I was told that poudriere uses
> 'portsnap' by default. What, do I have to do if I want it to defer to
> "gitup" {devel/py-git-up} instead?
gitup is not yet an option for creating the ports tree in poudriere:
$ zfs snapshot zroot/poudriere/ports/default@svn
$ zfs send zroot/poudriere/ports/default@svn | zfs recv
zroot/poudriere/ports/svn
$ poudriere ports -d
$ poudriere ports -c -U https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git -m git -B main
Th
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >>> On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >> On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 02/04/21 23:16,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 06:23:00AM +0200, Helge Oldach wrote:
> The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST):
> > Git is ready,
>
> Is it?
>
> # git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
> Cloning into 'ports'...
> fatal: repository 'https://git.freebs
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:01:18PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-Apr-2, at 20:24, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> >> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
> >> follow
I am using "poudriere-devel", version 3.3.99.20210303_1 on a FreeBSD
11.4-RELEASE-p8 amd64 machine. I was told that poudriere uses
'portsnap' by default. What, do I have to do if I want it to defer to
"gitup" {devel/py-git-up} instead?
--
Carmel
pgpagGmZ3Dx1s.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital si
On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
Please install gitup and read it's man page, it's straight forward.
--
Guido Falsi
Results:
gitup
On 03/04/21 06:23, Helge Oldach wrote:
The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST):
Git is ready,
Is it?
# git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
Cloning into 'ports'...
fatal: repository 'https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git/' not found
#
Check
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200,
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
19 matches
Mail list logo
