Re: Deprecation of portsnap
On 2021-04-13 15:53, Dave Horsfall wrote: On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports wrote: Except that git will arbitrarily and randomly decide that it needs to run "gc" - which is similarly extravagant in memory usage. Last time I found one running, it thrashed that poor VM for 3 days. Would this be a good time to mention the https://ohshitgit.com/ site? Warning: it contains strong language... It would! And the language is very appropriate, thank you. :-) -- Dave --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Deprecation of portsnap (was: Proposed ports git transition schedule)
> On 14. Apr 2021, at 00:54, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports wrote: > >> Except that git will arbitrarily and randomly decide that it needs to run >> "gc" - which is similarly extravagant in memory usage. Last time I found >> one running, it thrashed that poor VM for 3 days. > Would this be a good time to mention the https://ohshitgit.com/ site? > Warning: it contains strong language... I prefer this site: https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/ -m > > -- Dave > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Deprecation of portsnap (was: Proposed ports git transition schedule)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports wrote: Except that git will arbitrarily and randomly decide that it needs to run "gc" - which is similarly extravagant in memory usage. Last time I found one running, it thrashed that poor VM for 3 days. Would this be a good time to mention the https://ohshitgit.com/ site? Warning: it contains strong language... -- Dave ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: homepage for audio/faac
Thanks Dan, Will fixit soon. Kind Regards, Moin > On 14 Apr, 2021, at 00:41, Dan Langille wrote: > > At present, the home page for audio/faac is set to a domain which is no > longer relevant to the port. > > Should we set that to https://github.com/knik0/faac in pkg-descr? > > -- > Dan Langille > d...@langille.org > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
homepage for audio/faac
At present, the home page for audio/faac is set to a domain which is no longer relevant to the port. Should we set that to https://github.com/knik0/faac in pkg-descr? -- Dan Langille d...@langille.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: git: f9568249d150 - main - Mark as BROKEN to unbreak INDEX
Am 12.04.21 um 10:33 schrieb Koichiro Iwao: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:18:20AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:05 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: >>> >>> The branch main has been updated by meta: >>> >>> URL: >>> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=f9568249d15022f2ce6a2f214a46943c6006f626 >>> >>> commit f9568249d15022f2ce6a2f214a46943c6006f626 >>> Author: Koichiro Iwao >>> AuthorDate: 2021-04-12 08:00:06 + >>> Commit: Koichiro Iwao >>> CommitDate: 2021-04-12 08:03:43 + >>> >>> Mark as BROKEN to unbreak INDEX >>> --- >>> games/pink-pony/Makefile | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> Hi, >> >> This doesn't work like this, you have to fix it for real. > > Thanks for the the advice. Unfortunately, I don't have much interest in > fixing the port itself but just want to fix whole INDEX build. > > Maybe the person who removed graphics/ilmbase or the port maintainer should > fix it. I will try to fix INDEX again. > Sorry everyone, this slipped my testing list because I was looking for OpenEXR and Imath requisites, but missed the Half math requisite. The replacement for ilmbase library code is often math/Imath and sometimes graphics/OpenEXR. This requires minor updates in most build systems, and some more extensive updates in cmake-based build rigs. Code was patched for Imath 3.0.1 compatibility as of 5ac091e57. My apologies for the inconvenience. @Dmitry, this port requires glfw2, but "make depends" will also pass on glfw3, but glfw3 is incompatible and breaks the build, so LIB_DEPENDS was updated from libglfw.so:graphics/glfw2 to libglfw.so.0:graphics/glfw2 on the occasion. glfw install libglfw.so.3 so this resolves the confusion. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Changing daemon user, dir ownership and updating packages
As the maintainer, I've received this bug report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255009 If you'd like to run the daemon under a user different from the default git, you also need to change the ownership of the working directories, especially /var/*/gitea. The expectation is that upgrading the package will not change the ownership of already existing directories. When installing a newer version of the package, pkg appears to reset the ownership to those specified in the package. The pkg-plist has this: @owner git @group git @dir /var/db/gitea @dir /var/log/gitea @dir /var/run/gitea I believe this to be best practice. Is there a better way to have pkg create these dirs if they're missing, but not touch them if they are there already? Stefan -- Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ finance/moneymanagerex | 1.2.7 | v1.5.0 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by:portscout! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
