Re: A maintainers question: how to create a user?

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: See subject for the main question... the details: I am the maintainer of devel/aegis and the final installation step typically (linux RPM's for example) is to create a user to hold the baselines (in svn/cvs/csup

A maintainers question: how to create a user?

See subject for the main question... the details: I am the maintainer of devel/aegis and the final installation step typically (linux RPM's for example) is to create a user to hold the baselines (in svn/cvs/csup speak the project's repo) of the varioous projects managed by aegis... customerly this

submitting multiple ports at once

What is the best way to submit 4 or 5 ports at once (I have all the port files themselves stored on the same site that the distfiles are on and contain the same general pattern of ftp:://site.com/XXX/port-0.1.tar.gz)... so I do it one PR per port with the standard subject for a new port or a

setting the password of a automatically created account

I have a port that needs to create a a user of a given name and a given default password... I found in the porters guide how to make the account but not set the password ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: setting the password of a automatically created account

, Aryeh Friedman wrote: related questions: 1. How do I add the user to wheel (has it's own group but needs to be in wheel for reason number #2)? 2. How do I modify (in the safest possible way) an other port's installed config file(s) (namely I need to in the case of this port modify /usr/local/etc

Re: ports/182056: [NEW PORT] emulators/petitecloud -- thin frontend for bhve and in future versions other hyper-v's

I accidentally left a copyright notice in the Makefile of ports/182056 how do I make a followup to it to fix the problem? A side question the PR has been sitting for over a week with no one assigned to it? On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:

how to force upgrade

I have a port that has a very serious security flaw (no password required for super user level privileges) and in the fix I want to force the uninstalling of all previously installed versions (for obvious reasons)... how do I go about doing this... please note I am also the author of the ported

what on earth and how do I fix:

I maintain a port (not officially a part of the ports collection yet) that compiled just fine before staging support was added now I get: chown -R www:www /usr/local/etc/petitecloud Compressing man pages === Correct pkg-plist sequence to create group(s) and user(s) === Installing for

Re: what on earth and how do I fix:

Doing this disables the user creation part of the port On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: 05.10.2013 08:29, Aryeh Friedman пишет: I maintain a port (not officially a part of the ports collection yet) that compiled just fine before staging support

Re: Staging and directory modes/ownerships

Where is this documented? (I am making a port that needs do similar stuff but want to understand all the possible directives) On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 22:22:24 +0100 (CET) Melvyn Sopacua wrote: On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Tijl

Re: Staging and directory modes/ownerships

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: Please do not top post: it makes it impossible to follow a conversation. On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: Where is this documented? (I am making a port that needs do similar

how to tell pkg-list not to deinstall/overwrite certain files

I am doing a lot of inter-machine testing of a private port (will be released soon as a actual port) but need to tell make deinstall not to delete a certain file... how do we do this?... background one thing we are testing is the ability to upgrade the port (privately) and it must not nuke our

Re: how to tell pkg-list not to deinstall/overwrite certain files

Forgot to mention the solution should if at all possible be 100% pkg-plist based because our internal build system is not make On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: I am doing a lot of inter-machine testing of a private port (will be released soon

full documentation for all @'s in pkg-plist

Where would I find a complete list of @'s allowed in pkg-plist and hopefully an explination of each one? (the porter's handbook is incomplete) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: how to tell pkg-list not to deinstall/overwrite certain files

Aryeh Friedman wrote: Forgot to mention the solution should if at all possible be 100% pkg-plist based because our internal build system is not make On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: I am doing a lot of inter-machine testing of a private port

proper place to lock user account in port

right now I have: post-install: pw lock user under staging this is now called before the user is made what target should I move this to? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: full documentation for all @'s in pkg-plist

What has replaced it and where is it documented? (our port is for 10+ [requires bhyve]) On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote: On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:05:15 +0100 Julien Laffaye wrote: On 11/10/2013 12:47 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: Where would I find

Staging break user account modification in post-install

post-install is now called *BEFORE* users are created (before staging was added it was after)... looking at bsd.port.mk there seems no reasonable target that replaces post-install for this purpose. Namely I need to lock the user account that was created and assign a default password to it. This

Re: Staging break user account modification in post-install

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:59 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2013-11-10 20:40, Aryeh Friedman wrote: post-install is now called *BEFORE* users are created (before staging was added it was after)... looking at bsd.port.mk there seems no reasonable target that replaces post-install

why are new ports taking so long to commit

I submitted ports/185362 and ports/185361 over a week ago and I have heard nothing but automated replies so far. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: why are new ports taking so long to commit

Only in that a earlier version I submitted last fall (which needed to be reworked) got looked at in 2 days... On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:18 PM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote: On 1/13/2014 23:05, Aryeh Friedman wrote: I submitted ports/185362 and ports/185361 over a week ago and I

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is the problem? It seems to me, as a ports contributor, that this time is only growing, not shrinking, and there's no

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization list very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on which technology I should use, but rather a complaint on the state of jails related tools directly leading to the delays in handling of ports related

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

I would be willing to help write some scripts to start/stop the VM's (PetiteCloud does a command line that will be better documented and such in the next version or two) On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Aryeh

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: (maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.) Nice to be able to plug something other then petitecloud as a possible solution to this...

Fwd: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote: (maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.) github itself is closed source, but 95% of its functionality

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

By the way, this wasn't about switching to git (although that would be nice), this is about leveraging existing tools. One can very easily use git-svn bridge to push git changes into subversion. Or you can try to re-implement a patch queue based system yourself using a bunch of duct tape and

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

Making proper merge from github pull request it not that easy, you will need to fetch pull request as custom branches and cherry-pick them. That is really not convenient. devel/tailor was designed specifically for this case (the actual case it does is aegis --- svn) but same basic idea --

Fwd: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

-- Forwarded message -- From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays? To: John Marino dragonfly...@marino.st You are solving the wrong problem. And nobody is reinventing

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 01/25/2014 05:43, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: With the scripts it should be possible to fetch the patch of a PR, apply and commit it to your redports repository and do additional changes until you are okay with it. What is still

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote: The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really want to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end automating everything that can be automated is sure help free

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote: The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

I never said our selves it is outsourced to the developer/maintainer with 100% automated stuff... once I am doing with the next small version of petitecloud I will post the 6 line script we use to test the port (including cranking up a few vm's)... have fun doing that anywhere else Got bored

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

I like the KISS approach myself. This can be boiled down to those two issues, one of which is a symptom of the other. Arguing and debating over a long term solution to the OP's question does nothing to solve the problem in the short to intermediate term. There are 1680 current ports related

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

Perlstein wrote: On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote: The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really want to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

progress with their newness when in fact they are reinvinting the wheel for the 15th time On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 1/26/14 10:21 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: just do us a favor and do not assume newer means better... I've been using newer almost

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

Forgot to mention and aegis in almost every case implements the very same features in a much smoother way (no stupid http bs or anything) On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: If it is so new then why when I looked into git and git hub for the first

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

) If aegis is so much better then we should use it. Or everyone should use it... but why isn't everyone using it? Simple reason Peter Miller (the author of aegis/cook) for whatever reason *NEVER* tried to market his stuff while GIT made a specific effort of attempting to get outside users.

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: I'm not addicted to newness. I think you just hate anything that is popular and you're butthurt that something that's may have been ahead of it's time was missed out on. This is no reason to dig your heels in and

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: I'm not sure, I'm going to go load up healthcare.gov to see if I can order myself some free aspirin after this discussion. At least my build system has never caused me to need an aspirin (normal debugging is bad

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 1/26/14, 10:56 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: I'm not sure, I'm going to go load up healthcare.gov to see if I can order myself some free

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

, Lars Engels l...@freebsd.org wrote: Am 2014-01-25 05:30, schrieb Aryeh Friedman: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.org wrote: (maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt

best way to add www to wheel

I have the following line in my pkg-install: pw groupmod wheel -m www The reason is I have files that are created by a user account that also gets made but are modified using it or tomcat... these particular files are shell scripts that must run as root (they are for controlling bhyve and other

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD

not sure why it reported an install issue (even after deinstalling gimp and gimp-gnutlprint) both install fine after the deinstall portupgrade -a after the manual install fixed this one... all that is left is the lsof and mono problems above -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems

Re: [RFC/P] Port System Re-Engineering

Having said that dependencies often do depend on the order the leaves are installed, because some ports will use alternate dependencies according to what's already there. It makes things a lot easier to maintain. ___ btw xdm is not the worst

determining what ports directly depend on X

I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now (but this will need to be more general later) is attempting to find all the direct childern of libtool15 ___

Re: determining what ports directly depend on X

On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now (but this will need to be more general later) is attempting to find all

Re: determining what ports directly depend on X

On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now

Re: determining what ports directly depend on X

On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now

Re: Thunderbird, enigmail, and GCC 3.4

I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird works... don't know about 7 On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Alex Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Xin LI wrote: Finally I caught the issue for thunderbird. It was due to the difference between our floating point handling

help with making a port

I am attempting to put together a port for a new program and I am getting a very odd error message (i.e. it says the port conflicts with itself!?!?!?!): pkg-static: foo-0.1 conflicts with foo-0.1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/share/foo/foo.jar What causes

Fwd: help with making a port

-- Forwarded message -- From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM Subject: help with making a port To: FreeBSD Ports ML freebsd-ports@freebsd.org I am attempting to put together a port for a new program and I am getting a very odd error

Fwd: help with making a port

GMail is being weird this is a 3rd try at reposting -- Forwarded message -- From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM Subject: help with making a port To: FreeBSD Ports ML freebsd-ports@freebsd.org I am attempting to put together a port

Re: help with making a port

, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jason Helfman j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: I am attempting to put together a port for a new program and I am getting a very odd error message (i.e. it says the port conflicts with itself

Re: help with making a port

oops forgot the pkg-plist: share/foo/foo.jar etc/rc.d/foo etc/foo/instances apache-tomcat-7.0/webapps/foo.war On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: It uses a non-standard build system (devel/cook) but here is the Makefile for the port itself

Re: help with making a port

Looking in /var/db/pkg and /var/db/ports I see nothing... anywhere else to look? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: help with making a port

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jason Helfman j...@freebsd.org wrote: pkg which /path/to/file or pkg_info -W /path/to/file Odd though that you checked there, and it wasn't recorded aryeh@dev:/home/aryeh% pkg_info -W /usr/local/share/foo/foo.jar pkg_info: You appear to be using the newer

name of a port that builds on 10-CURRENT but not 9?

I am making a port and need to see a good working example of how to make it so it will not compile on less then 10-CURRENT ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Can the following license be used for ported programs?

My company develops software under a commercial open source (see links for details) and I want to know if my license is close enough to open source (see links for why it is not 100% OSD compliant [it is 95% compliant]). Specifically does the business model as outlined in my blog (the third

Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?

not just try the mysql dual license model, it seems less tricky-dicky Aryeh Friedman wrote: Is that based on gut feeling or a study of the links offered? --Aryeh On 9/23/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no matter how hard you try, you can't take your sow's ear and turn

Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?

On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: many people feel much differently, why not just a pure proprietary license then, rather than proliferating Yet Another Silly License which is not tempered by sound legal analysis. Not to be insulting but I don't think you read my 1st blog

Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?

SIW [I came to it in a different route]) http://www.methodsandtools.com/PDF/mt200402.pdf (detailed theoretical examination of Jahia's business model) --Aryeh On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: great, then why open the conversation up to plebs like me? Aryeh Friedman wrote

Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?

model was as a member of the SIW community and not as a owner of a company that practices it. On 9/24/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 23 September 2007 18:41:43 Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: many people feel much differently

Re: nvidia-driver rebooting machine on X startup

On 9/24/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 21:14:03 falz wrote: I came across this thread on freebsd-questions after some searching on google. I have the exact same issue as others here- if xorg is started with 'nvidia' as the driver, instant reboot. However, my

xorg 7.3/freebsd 7-current/nvidia cards on p35 chip sets update

The new vm code in the kernel (cvsup) seems to have helped some things in this combination. Neither nv or nvidia will recognize my 5200 GT; but vesa now gives me 24 depth and has noticeably better response time. For the people who are having problems with spontanous reboots some progress *MAY*

Re: What if a port uses build systems not supported by ports

Create a port for the build system and when you submit the update for the new port also submit the one for the build system On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:42 PM, matt donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I come across a few applications that don't use imake, gmake, or a configure script. How do I

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

Menus are not appearing either On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Olivier Duchateau wrote: % pkg_info -Ix hicolor hicolor-icon-theme-0.12 A high-color icon theme shell from the FreeDesktop project Are you installed

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

Using the xinitrc that Oliver listed fixed the menus but not the icons for me On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Olivier Duchateau duchateau.oliv...@gmail.com wrote: Myself I copy xinitrc file taken from

Re: Problem with xfce-4.8

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: Oliver --            There have been a number of reports from various people of xfce-4.8 being broken... the main issues seem to be:            1. Icon's are missing            2. Application menu

Problem with xfce-4.8

Oliver -- There have been a number of reports from various people of xfce-4.8 being broken... the main issues seem to be: 1. Icon's are missing 2. Application menu is not available 3. Terminal does not do any short of ANSI colors Some

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

you copy it $HOME/.xsession or $HOME/.xinitrc depending if you start from xdm or command line On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: Using the xinitrc that Oliver listed

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

All I know is once I copied it to .xsession it worked fine from xdm On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: you copy it $HOME/.xsession or $HOME/.xinitrc depending if you start

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

A few minor icons on panel 2 are missing but everuthing else is there On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello hello, On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: All I know is once I copied it to .xsession it worked

Re: xfce 4.8 upgrade errors.

I had to reinstall all my ports from scratch to fix this... for how to do this safely see the last example of the man page for portmaster On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Scott T. Hildreth sh...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I updated my server to 8.2 and then all my ports.  When compiling orage or

sysutils/dolly breaks cvs

cvs update: cannot create read lock in repository

Re: sysutils/dolly breaks cvs

// cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly/files/// cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly/files cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly/files/ On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:22:38AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman

Re: sysutils/dolly breaks cvs

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:35:02AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote: This is from a repo that was updated 15 mins ago: flosoft-stable# cvs co ports/sysutils/dolly | more cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly cvs

8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx

Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example x11-toolkits/vte produces: gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add' discards qualifiers from pointer target type mv -f

Re: 8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx

No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution vs. fixing base) On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried

Re: problems building vim:

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > There is an open PR for this Problem: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzi > lla/show_bug.cgi?id=217024 > > An interesting hint is it built and installed correctly on a an other machine with the same updates but does not

pkgconfig fails to configure on 12-CURRENT

FreeBSD rain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #93 r314227: Fri Feb 24 13:51:55 EST 2017 root@rain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pkgconf-1.3.0 for building ===> Extracting for pkgconf-1.3.0 => SHA256 Checksum OK for pkgconf-1.3.0.tar.xz. ===>

Re: pkgconfig fails to configure on 12-CURRENT

org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:08:28PM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > FreeBSD rain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #93 r314227: Fri Feb 24 > > 13:51:55 EST 2017 root@rain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > ===> Fetching all distfi

port collection severally broken on 11-STABLE (it also breaks make world)

On FreeBSD lilith 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r307694: Fri Oct 21 00:10:20 EDT 2016 root@lilith:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 In order to install java/openjdk8 and devel/subversion I had to install the following as packages instead of compiling it from source also make world also

upgrade to devel/dbus breaks xfce4

After upgrading deval/dbus to dbus-1.10.12 xfce4 fails to start as a non-root user due to being unable to open/write to /etc/machine-id. I made a tempurary fix by touching /etc/machine-id and chmod'ing it to 777. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org

Re: upgrade to devel/dbus breaks xfce4

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <rak...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.fried...@gmail.com> writes: > > > After upgrading deval/dbus to dbus-1.10.12 xfce4 fails to start as a > > non-root user due to being unable to open/write

Re: upgrade to devel/dbus breaks xfce4

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.fried...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa < >> rak...@freebsd.org> >&g

How to suppress boot up messages from sysutils/automount

When I boot I get a lot of junk messages (hints about how to configure it) form sysutils/automount while I want to keep automount in the startup I want to suppress these messages -- how? Note without both settings below it does not automount my flash drive (da4)... also coping

best way to handle GCC version detection

I have port I maintain that compiles fine under GCC 5 (or lower) but barfs on GCC 6. A small modification will make it compile under 6 but the very same modification makes it incompatible with 5. What is the best way to handle this and still allow USE_GCC=any ? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead

Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

First some background (my typical use cases for ports): 0. FreeBSD lilith 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE #0 r321664: Fri Jul 28 23:35:18 EDT 2017 root@lilith:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 1. Daily routine (current): cd /usr/src svn update (from 11.1-RELEASE) [make

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Johan Hendriks <joh.hendr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Op 06/12/2017 om 10:53 schreef Mathieu Arnold: > > Le 05/12/2017 à 23:25, Baho Utot a écrit : > >> > >> On 12/05/17 17:09, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >>> Le 05/12/

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Jonathan Chen <j...@chen.org.nz> wrote: > On 5 December 2017 at 22:53, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.fried...@gmail.com> > wrote: > [...] > > 2. I installed synth (2.00) and *ATTEMPTED* to do a upgrade-system with > the > > following