dirmngr-1.1.0_12 conflicts with gnupg-2.1.0_1 (installs files into the same place)

I just updated, or rather tried to update the gnupg port. it failed with a message that it conflicts with the dirmngr port. I deleted that port and then preceded to install GNUPG. When I attempted to re-install the dirmngr port, it issued this error message: dirmngr-1.1.0_12 conflicts with

Unable to build webkit-gtk2 after updating ICU

While updating ICU as suggested in UPDATING, the webkit-gtk2 port failed to build. I have tried several times, including making sure all other ports were updated. I then removed the port and tried again. It still failed. I even tried webkit-gtk3; however, that failed also. It fails with this

Re: Unable to build webkit-gtk2 after updating ICU

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:07:20 -0700, David Wolfskill stated: I'm no expert on Gnome-related things, but (especially since you had tried earlier), you might want to re-try the make attempt using make clean install -- within script(1), as you did, as that's almost always a Good Idea. Peace, david

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

On Wed, 13 May 2015 01:24:35 +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt stated: [Truncated] The most reliable method to eliminate this, for lack of a better word bullshit, would be for FreeBSD to keep the base system openssl version up-to-date. It is apparent to even the most casual observer that the present

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

On Wed, 13 May 2015 07:41:55 -0400, Ernie Luzar stated: I am having the same problem. Many things missing from the base openssl that are in the port openssl. Installing the port version only complicates things by not knowing which directory structure is really in play. My suggestion is just

Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print

The problem has nothing to do with proprietary drivers, etcetera but rather the extremely fractured system of printing on non MS Windows based systems. I have had extensive conversations with representatives from Brother and while they do include PPD's and other assorted files for some of their

Re: ftp/curl needs better config error message please

On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 01:34:57 +0100, Joe Holden stated: Not sure if I am missing something here - just set GSSAPI_NONE for the port and it just works (tm) It would work a lot better if this insanity were corrected and it was fully compatible with the ports version of ssl. Rather than correcting

Re: Problem building maildrop with exim as MTA

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 23:59:29 -0400, Jim Trigg stated: Any suggestions as to how to fix this? I'm attempting to migrate from one host running Postfix to a new host running Exim but want to continue my maildrop support. (The switch is an attempt to reduce backscatter by doing more antispam

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:48:04 +0200, Michelle Sullivan stated: Carmel NY wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated: The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an alias for commands like ssh to point to the ports version

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:48:04 +0200, Michelle Sullivan stated: Carmel NY wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated: The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an alias for commands like ssh to point to the ports

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated: The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an alias for commands like ssh to point to the ports version. These methods aren't quite as clean though. Swapping the PATH can, in a few

Re: Problem building maildrop with exim as MTA

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:07:20 -0400, Jim Trigg stated: I'm not. I'm accepting mail for the request interface of the mailing lists I host, and the return addresses are forged so the automated replies can't go through. This doesn't sound right, and I use Postfix. Check out:

Re: Error message when refreshing keys

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:56:01 +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt stated: I am on 10.1-RELEASE (amd64) and have installed latest gpg 2.0.27 from ports. When issuing # gpg --refresh-keys operation seems to work but I am getting following error messages at the end: ... gpg: keyserver communications error: Not

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:06:05 +, Brooks Davis stated: We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with build everything by hand which makes us look bad. I've been somewhat tempted to adding a slave

tlmgr on FreeBSD

Has anyone gotten the tlmgr program for maintaining texlive packages, etcetera to run on FreeBSD? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: tlmgr on FreeBSD

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:41:08 -0700, Russell L. Carter stated: Works just fine for me from the texlive 2015 download (and previous as well). I don't use ports to maintain my latex packages though. Obviously, that is the reason, although I fail to see why it has been disabled in the port version.

Re: tlmgr on FreeBSD

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:08:50 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: Hi! Yes, I know, and it is installed. This is the error message: cannot setup TLPDB in /usr at /usr/local/bin/tlmgr line 5611. This: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/137428/tlmgr-cannot-setup-tlpdb says: tlmgr init-usertree

Re: tlmgr on FreeBSD

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:03:56 +0200, A.J. Fonz van Werven stated: Carmel NY wrote: although I fail to see why it has been disabled in the port version. As stated previously (although on freebsd-tex@ instead of freebsd-ports@) it hasn't been disabled, it's a separate port (print/texlive-tlmgr

Swat2

I understand that there is a swat2 available for Samba4*. I have not seen it in the ports system thought. Is it available for FreeBSD? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SWAT2 -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Python default versions

Unless I am mistaken, the default version of "python" on FreeBSD is "2.7" The default version for the "meta-port" for version 3 of the Python interpreter is "3.4" I was just wondering if there is any serious consideration to at least changing the FreeBSD default version to "3.x". Python 3.0 was

update PHP

I am running a FreeBSD 10.2 - p7 machine. I have PHP 5.4 installed . I want to update it to version 5.6. Would this method work: portupgrade -o lang/php56 lang/php5 Then: portupgrade -o lang/php56-extensions lang/php5-extensions Would I l then need to rebuild everything that depends on PHP or

Re: update PHP

On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 19:21:10 +0100, Miroslav Lachman stated: >pkg query %o `pkg info -r php55 | tail -n +2` | sed 's~php5~php56~' > >my_php_ports That list 1154 ports. pkg query %o `pkg info -r php5 | tail -n +2` results in 22 ports. print/pecl-pdflib www/pecl-APC www/php5-session

Re: Updating php

On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:00:29 +, Matthew Seaman stated: >This is why I generally prefer to use php-fpm nowadays, and access them >from a HTTP server using FCGI. It provides a useful separation of >roles: the web server can handle serving pages as efficiently as >possible and need not know

Re: Updating php

On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:51:24 +0100, Torsten Zuehlsdorff stated: >Hello, > >> I just updated php5 (5.4) to php56. I now have two programsthat will not >> run. "net/phpldapadmin" and "databases/phpmyadmin". When I attempt to >> access "net/phpldapadmin" via the net, I receive this error message:

Updating php

FreeBSD-10.2 I just updated php5 (5.4) to php56. I now have two programsthat will not run. "net/phpldapadmin" and "databases/phpmyadmin". When I attempt to access "net/phpldapadmin" via the net, I receive this error message: Notice: Undefined variable: _SESSION in

Re: Call for Help: need script for patching ports tree, building with poudriere

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:30:06 +0100, Torsten Zühlsdorff stated: >I'm sorry Ricky. I tried to contact you already, but hotmail.com blocked >my mailserver. And it is as always surprisingly hard to even find the >removal request form... Why is it being blocked? What was the error code or other

Re: Call for Help: need script for patching ports tree, building with poudriere

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:26:05 +0100, Torsten Zuehlsdorff stated: >On 01.12.2015 12:11, Carmel NY wrote: > >>> I'm sorry Ricky. I tried to contact you already, but hotmail.com blocked >>> my mailserver. And it is as always surprisingly hard to even find the >>> re

Import MySQL 5.7.9 into ports

Unless I am mistaken, MySQL 5.7.9 in not in the ports system. Are there any plans to add this to the ports tree? There appears to be a tarball for FreeBSD listed. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: Import MySQL 5.7.9 into ports

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:08:48 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: >> Unless I am mistaken, MySQL 5.7.9 >> in not in the ports system. >> Are there any plans to add this to the ports tree? There appears to be a >> tarball for FreeBSD listed. > >There's work

Update "net-p2p/btsync"

Is it possible to update the "/usr/ports/net-p2p/btsync" port? It is now at version 2.2.7 as currently listed on: https://www.getsync.com/platforms/desktop Thanks! -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Update Postfix-current port.

The current version of the Postfix development available in the ports system is 3.3-20170502; however, the present version available is postfix-3.3-20170611. Is it possible to get the port's version undated? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

clamav-unofficial-sigs

The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are there any plans to update the port? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: "clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It >determines if there are updates or whether you have checked recently, >so that you do not inadvertently dos the signature servers. What is >NOT working, apparently, is

Re: clamav-unofficial-sigs

On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 09:49:09 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a >> newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are >> there any plans to update the port? > >Have you tried to provide a patch ? It's structure

"clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

I recently installed clamav-unofficial-sigs via the ports system. The port version is quite old,v5.3.2, while the current version is v5.6.2. In any case, I am receiving the following error message repeatedly: Jun 24 15:45:00 ERROR: clamscan binary (clamscan_bin) not found This is the full log

Re: "clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:37:29 +0200, Marko Njezic stated: >On 2017-06-25 18:16, Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >> >>> From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It >>> determines if there are up

Re: Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:42:31 +0200, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator stated: >On 26-9-2017 15:31, Carmel NY wrote: >> I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up >> and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" modu

Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" module. Apache24 complains that it is not present and quits. What port installs that module? I cannot seem to locate it. Thanks :) -- Carmel

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:00:02 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >Excerpt from Jan Beich: > >> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building >> editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of most desktop applications >> are so complex that the build falls apart if the upgrade

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:27:40 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >from Chris H: > >> FWIW I loved portmaster, but quickly found that by choosing it, I was >> *instantly* at odds with a large majority of the FreeBSD crowd. >> Eventually, I experimented with other choices, and finally landed on >>

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:06:17 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Carmel NY <carmel...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> >> Excuse my ignorance, but why was John Marino exiled? >> >> >Not to state any opinion of my own, but John had h

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:51:39 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 30/09/2017 18:06, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> John did state that he would continue to support synth. I can't say if he >> has continued to make contributions. In any case, only poudriere is >> available for maintaining ports in HEAD and

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote: >> 1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does >> the user have to determine that what is out-of-date and feed them to >> poudriere manually an

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:15:13 -0700, Yuri stated: >On 09/03/17 17:54, Geoffrey Huntley wrote: >> Seehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and >> https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 > > >Is there a body of software that requires .Net? I never came across >anything

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > Hi Carmel, > > > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system > > that is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw make. > > > > There are many

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sunday, December 3, 2017 3:46 PM, Chris H stated: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" > po...@freebsd.org> said > > On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > > > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > > > Hi Carmel, > > > > > > > > My

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

> First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going to > clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a > long time. > > Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears > dead. Any reason to expect it to be workable again?

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:35:55 +0100, Jos Chrispijn stated: >On 8-12-2017 17:58, Warren Block wrote: >> procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the >> time.  Consider maildrop as a more powerful and more maintained >> replacement that is pretty easy to implement: >I

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:20 +, Johannes Lundberg stated: >Hi > >I want to suggest that we enable wayland by default. In current state >having some parts of wayland in ports is basically useless the >end-users themselves re-build gtk30 and mesa-libs with wayland >enabled. > >libwayland-egl.so

Re: Package database problems

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:37:02 -0600, Paul Schmehl stated: >Is there a way to force a port install regardless of conflicts? This is untried. Using synth, you could create a file with a listing of all your installed ports, then run: synth force "your file" That should correct the problem. That

Multiple www/drupal8 installations

I have a question regarding “www/drupal8” and configuring for multiple sites. From what I have read, it seems that there are quite a few users who feel it is neither safe nor advisable to do it the way the Drupal8 documentation says. I have another solution that I thought might be serviceable.

Availability of py-certbot-apache

I was wondering if anyone could tell me when the "py-certbot-apache" port might be available? The port's message indicates that it will be available in the "security/py-certbot-apache" port; however, it obviously isn't. -- Carmel pgpC5XCqi8lD9.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 8:01 AM, Baho Utot stated: > On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning > >> how to use an industrial sized solution line

RE: The ports@ list is now subscriber-post only

On Monday, December 11, 2017 9:17 AM, Lowell Gilbert stated: > "Thomas Mueller" writes: > > > Why only the freebsd-ports mailing list and no others? > > > > Other FreeBSD mailing lists get spam, and I thought freebsd-questions was > the biggest target for spam. > > A fair

RE: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:18 PM, RW wrote: > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Strongly agree! Support ofr some basics like .forward is really a > > requirement. It is used for too many "normal" mail operations > > including private dropmail or procmail setups as

Re: Of Git and M$

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:37:39 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated: >On Sat, 16 Jun 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote: > >> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase >> of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the >> shots...[*] The only good thing

RE: lang/gcc6-aux fails to build

> On Monday, May 28, 2018 4:07 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, lang/gcc6-aux is failing to build at r471064 with: > > 1.irontree:gcc6-aux,8:05am# pwd > /usr/ports/lang/gcc6-aux > 1.irontree:gcc6-aux,8:05am# svnlite info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports > URL:

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:05:21 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/06/04 17:41: >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >> >>> Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >>> https://github.com/Micro

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode >I know my friends are running it on Ubuntu but I didn't found any >references how to run it on FreeBSD desktop. > >Miroslav Lachman

Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:33:48 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >from STefan Esser: > >> I used to be a portupgrade user, long ago (years before the introduction >> of the new package tools), but then mobed over to using portmaster. > >> When the package system (PKG-NG) war completely reworked, I

Re: FreeBSD Port: samba46-4.6.8

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 01:58:33 +0200, Dutchman01 stated: >Hello timor, > > > >Would you please have a look and upgrade this port to 4.6.9 release please, > >it really has some nice bug fixes/patches. I believe it was only released Oct 25. I think we should allow the port maintainer a few days to

Synth failing

Synth is failing with the following error message: # synth upgrade-system Builder mounts detected; attempting to remove them automatically ... Dismounting successful! Old work directories detected; attempting to remove them automatically ... Directory removal successful! Regenerating flavor

daily security run output and joomla3

FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p6 I have "www/joomla3" installed and working fine. Part of the configuration routine is the removal of the "installation" directory in joomla3 when it is configured. This is done as a security feature and joomla3 advertises that it will not run if that directory is present.

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:51:16 +0100, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/01/28 11:59: >> FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p6 >> >> I have "www/joomla3" installed and working fine. Part of the configuration >> routine is the removal of the &qu

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 02:56:51 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: >From: Carmel NY <carmel...@outlook.com> >Subject: Re: daily security run output and joomla3 >Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:38:10 + > >>>You can try "pkg check -r", see man pkg-check >

Error 8192 with phpldapadmin

Name : phpldapadmin Version: 1.2.3_7,1 Name : php72 Version: 7.2.2 Recently, "phpldapadmin" has started throwing an error message as shown below: Unrecognized error number: 8192: Function create_function() is deprecated How can I go about correcting this

Re: Error 8192 with phpldapadmin

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 23:41:13 +, Matthew Seaman stated: >The phpldapadmin codebase has not seen significant work for some years >now. This is a symptom of that neglect -- the code has not been adapted >to upstream changes in php. At the moment despite being self-described >as an 'error', this

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:20:24 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: Apache 2.4 and PHP 7.2 are running on my home server. ~ $ freebsd-version 11.1-RELEASE-p6 ~ $ pkg info -x 'php72|apache24' apache24-2.4.29 mod_php72-7.2.2 php72-7.2.2 php72-bcmath-7.2.2 php72-bz2-7.2.2 php72-calendar-7.2.2

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:11:32 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: >From: >Subject: Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so? >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:52:52 -0500 > >> Okay, I rebuilt apache24 and php72 from ports. I'm still getting >> the error. >> >> Would someone

"security/py-certbot-apache" port

I just updated my system and installed the "security/py-certbot-apache" port using "synth". The installation went fine. The problem now is when I attempt to run "certbot" it fails. The error log is below. I was forced to remove the py-certbot-apache port in order to get certbot to work again.

Re: Deprecating Skype ports

On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:17:30 +0100, Johannes Jost Meixner stated: >Hi Rene, > >What do you think about deprecating Skype ports? > >As far as I'm aware, Microsoft does not allow them to connect anymore, >thus they have become useless to keep. > There are at least a couple of URLs dealing with

Re: phpLDAPadmin -- is it time to drop this from ports?

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:32:54 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark stated: >On 04/05/18 15:30, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 05/04/2018 13:35, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Matthew Seaman : >>> Dear all, I've maintained the net/phpldapadmin port for _many_

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200, Stefan Esser stated: {truncated} >This is another case (after the implementation of FLAVOR support that does >not seem well-designed and causes lots of effort and inefficiencies in port >management tools like portmaster), which makes me consider giving up my

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700, Steve Kargl stated: >This discussion occurred with the introduction of FLAVORS, >which broken all ports management tools except poudriere. So, you have not tried "synth" and I assume poudriere. -- Carmel ___

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:53:49 +0200, Stefan Esser stated: >Yes, but I put literally hundreds of hours of effort into >understanding portmaster (which is one monolythic 4000 line >shell script with global state that recursively invokes itself >to implement local state, with hundreds of instances

Re: Changing PHP default version from 5.6 to 7.2 timeframe?

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:51:51 +0200, Matthias Fechner stated: >Am 19.04.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >> I'm not involved in the decision, but I've heard from problems >> with typo3 and php7.2. > >I saw similar problems with other products. >For me I will stick to php7.1 for at least one

"converters/php72-mbstring" build failure

FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p8 I am attempting to update the "converters/php72-mbstring" port. The older version build fine. The newest version fails with this error message: /usr/local/include/oniguruma.h:673:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct php_mb_re_pattern_buffer' struct re_pattern_buffer;

Re: "converters/php72-mbstring" build failure

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:42:41 +1100, Kubilay Kocak stated: >On 19/03/2018 9:33 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> On 19/03/2018 9:22 pm, Carmel NY wrote: >>> FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p8 >>> >>> I am attempting to update the "converters/php72-mbstring" port

orphaned: www/suphp

I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" which produced this: suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp There is nothing about this in either the UPDATING or MOVED files. Has this port actually been removed and if so, why? -- Carmel

Moving to php-7.2 default

Unless I am mistaken, the default version of PHP in FreeBSD is "version 7.1". According to the PHP page, the 7.1 version was released on December 1, 2016, Its EOL is scheduled for December 1, 2018 (this year) and security support ends on December 1, 2019. Wouldn't it be a wise decision to up the

Re: orphaned: www/suphp

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 19:31:52 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 20/10/2018 16:28, Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote: >>> I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" >>> which produced this: >>> >>> suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp >>> >>> There is nothing

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:49:07 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Carmel NY wrote: >> >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, >

Updating poudriere jail

I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, if I do update, will I have to rebuild all of my installed applications? Thanks :) -- Carmel ___

Building devel/llvm60 on FreeBSD 12.0

Has anyone, besides me of course, had a problem building "devel/llvm60" after updating to FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE? My build, using poudriere, keeps ending with this error message: c++: error: unable to execute command: Killed c++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:14:11 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Hi, > >after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to >compile: > > configure: error: Cannot find libmilter > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Michael Grimm wrote: > >> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >> compile the clamav-libmilter port no libmilter.so can be found by >> configure (see error message above) unless you

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:29:18 +1100, andrew clarke stated: >On Thu 2018-12-13 19:43:30 UTC+0000, Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com) wrote: > >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the po

Updating perl

Using poudriere, I attempted to update my system to the new "perl 5.28". I made the necessary changes in the "make.conf" files and then attempted to run poudriere. At the very beginning of the run, poudriere issued a warning that "security/py-certbot | py36-certbot-0.29.1_1,1" failed. This is from

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:23:39 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >>> Michael Grimm wrote: > >>>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >&

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >Hi, > >I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled: >CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \ > --with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \ > --without-shadow \ > --without-sodium \ > >by

dovecot-libsodium-plugin

I notice that there is no port for the "dovecot-libsodium-plugin"; "https://github.com/LuckyFellow/dovecot-libsodium-plugin/;. I was wondering if anyone had an interest in creating one? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Updating "mysql80-server" port

My daily security run summary includes the following: Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities: Database fetched: Sun Dec 9 03:18:49 EST 2018 mysql80-server-8.0.12_2 This has been included in the report for quite some time now. After doing some quick checking, I find that MySQL

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:47:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:44 AM Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:16AM +, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >> >

Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:31:27 +0200, Oleg V. Nauman stated: >On Sunday, January 6, 2019 9:58:29 PM EET Alex V. Petrov wrote: >> New depence? >> >> checking for Kerberos V in /usr/local... found >> checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lcrypto... no >> checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in

poudriere and forcing depends

I have come across several ports that poudriere builds with the wrong dependencies. I have MySQL 8.0 installed by poudriere. I wanted to install "databases/mysqlbackup" When built using the system "make install" command, it works fine. However, when I attempt to build it with poudriere, poudriere

Updating Postfix

Both Postfix 3.4 stable release and Postfix 3.5 experimental release were released over a month ago. In fact, the stable release is now at Postfix 3.4.4. The posts system still has postfix-3.3.3,1 as the stable release and Postfix-3.4.20181202,5 as the development release. I am just inquiring to

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 06:40:01 -0800, Steve Kargl stated: >On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 08:31:12AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote: >> Moin moin >> >> Make sure all your qt5-(qt5-gui dependency)-ports that are already >> installed are at 5.12.0. >> > >They are all up to date. > >% cd /usr/ports >% svn

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 07:35:25 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis stated: >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:18:50PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: So there is more "software bureaucracy" here than just applying one patch. > >You sure about that Dima? Whether one or several the patching doesn't

Updating Samba

The 20190619 entry in "UPDATING" recommends certain actions for updating Samba4[6-8] utilizing either 'portmaster' or 'portupgrade'. Are there4 any special actions that have to be taken if utilizing 'poudriere'? Thanks! -- Carmel NY ___ fre

Switching to openssl111

FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p6 GENERIC amd64 openssl version: OpenSSL 1.0.2s 28 May 2019 I want to use openssl111 so I can take advantage of 'tls 1.3' with postfix and apache24. I am trying to determine the correct procedure to use. I am using poudriere to build my packages and then install them. 1)

  1   2   >