/WTF? If not, I would recommend you do so.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
on one of my machines, and it is working correctly.
dmesg | grep -i geforce
nvidia0: GeForce GT 220 on vgapci0
This is a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 machine and the card is not exactly start
of the art either.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
I was wondering if there are any plans to update
sysutils/gnome-schedule? The port version is: 2.1.1, released on
2009-09-11. The latest version is: gnome-schedule-2.1.5 released on
2011-09-03. In any event, there have been several versions released
prior to this latest one.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po
might be advisable also.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
This year October has 5 Mondays, 5 Saturdays and 5 Sundays
When attempting to build the math/fftw3 port, the following error
message is immediately displayed and the build halted:
Variable CFLAGS is recursive.
I have filed a PR against it.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:40:06 -0400
b. f. articulated:
On 9/26/11, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote:
On 09/25/2011 08:19 PM, Jerry wrote:
When attempting to build the math/fftw3 port, the following error
message is immediately displayed and the build halted
to confirm if the condition still exists?
In any event, it works here. Sat Oct 15 2011 08:47:15 EDT
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
, it also fetches the distfiles which are missing or
failed the checksum calculation. Defining NO_CHECKSUM will
skip this step.
You could also contact the port maintainer: ga...@freebsd.org
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
When attempting to build the postgresql-client-8.2.22_1 port, this
error message is being emitted:
postgresql-client-8.2.22_1: Makefile error: you cannot include
bsd.port[.pre].mk twice
Has anyone else noticed it? I filed a PR against it.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off
different reason.
http://www.technograte.com/2011/05/18/gnome-to-drop-support-for-bsd-solaris-unix/
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/gnome-to-drop-support-for-bsd-solaris-unix/
--
Jerry ♔
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might
be rectified in the near future?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
with pointyhat.
Sahil, I know from time to time that you post on the Postfix forum.
Have you tried contacting Wietse, aka Mr Grumpy personally and asking
him for his take on the problem?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:54:02 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
Sloppy programmers should never be rewarded.
I couldn't agree more fully. Unfortunately, they all too often are.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800
David O'Brien articulated:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04:47PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the
shells/bash port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some
future date. I am not sure I understand
hours.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:36:20 -0500
Sahil Tandon articulated:
This port has been updated to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 2019.
Thanks Sahil. :)
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
if you should experience any problems..
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
a technical support address. It
also seems to indicate that it supports BSD, although that does not say
a lot in and of itself. In any case, have you tried their technical
support? I think I would start there before I went any further.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
of this application?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure
can go wrong
to to name other users of the device I was inquiring about. I
felt rather embarrassed to admit that I could not name a single one. At
least you had one.
Good luck!
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Are there any plans to update graphics/poppler port to the latest
version? The latest such release is poppler-0.18.3.tar.gz, released on
January 15, 2012 and corrects a few important bugs.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
, it might be helpful for a potential user to know that prior
to attempting to use said port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
and it seems to fail on i386
only; amd64 looks ok.
I just sent a full log to the maintainer.
I can confirm that it fails on a FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 machine.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Has a final solution been arrived at for the problem of updating
ghostscript9-9.04 9.05? I did not see a formal PR filed against it;
although I could have easily missed it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:33:07 +
Chris Rees articulated:
This has already been discussed on ports@, please don't cross-post.
The problem has not been rectified as of yet. There is an open PR 165093
filed against the port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
over ride the check-sum problem, I feel it should be correct at the
source.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
was not caught earlier. I was under the
impression that some sort of verification was done on these updates
before they were released to the the mirrors, etc. If not, then perhaps
there should be.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
'\
s,%%MAKE_ENV%%,${MAKE_ENV},; \
Did you contact the port maintainer: sunp...@freebsd.org as well as
possibly submitting a PR against the port? If not, it might prove
useful.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
.
Script done on Wed Feb 22 16:55:58 2012
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:00:15 +0200
Andriy Gapon articulated:
on 23/02/2012 00:48 Alberto Villa said the following:
On Wednesday 22 February 2012 23:28:01 Jerry wrote:
Has anyone else had a problem updating the net-im/telepathy-qt4
port? It has failed to build twice for me in the past 12
The port version of /usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-glib is 12.7 while
the latest version is 17.5. The port maintainer is listed as
gn...@freebsd.org. Therefore, I was trying to find out if there are
any plans to update this port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
for no reason.
The port version is only 12.7 while the latest release is 17.5.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
The Ancient Doctrine of Mind
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:54:53 +0200
Andriy Gapon articulated:
on 23/02/2012 01:00 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 23/02/2012 00:48 Alberto Villa said the following:
On Wednesday 22 February 2012 23:28:01 Jerry wrote:
Has anyone else had a problem updating the net-im/telepathy-qt4
port
would be willing to work with a work group interested in determining
the feasibility of creating a working model for inclusion into the
FreeBSD architecture.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
.
By the way, portmanager does not have the problems you were
attributing to postmaster. Whether that is by design or just dumb luck
I cannot attest to. That is why I still use it although most other
users have abandoned it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
this problem?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
% current.
Now, if you will excuse me, I want to look out my window and watch the
elephants fly.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
assumptions and
thereby offers the simplest explanation of the effect.
It is usually translated as, simpler explanations are, other things
being equal, generally better than more complex ones. The key phase
being other things being equal.
Personally, I am a strong believer in Murphy's Law.
--
Jerry
. If support for EOL'd crap was
implemented immediately, support for the newer versions would be
instituted lickety-split.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:46:23 -0700
Ronald F. Guilmette articulated:
Who is allegedly maintaining the graphics/dri port at this moment in
time?
x...@freebsd.org
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
December 21, I think you should revise that to at least
Firefox 12 or better.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
-devel-2.99.4 version is really not
the latest experimental version any longer, shouldn't it be removed to
avoid any confusion?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:32 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
GnuTLS v3.0.18 was released on 2012-04-02. The latest port's
versions are gnutls-2.12.18 and gnutls-devel-2.99.4
respectively.
GnuTLS v3.0.18 is considered the latest stable build by the
authors
you installed to get samba to install in the first
place first. While you are at it, move your /etc/make.conf file out of
the way and have the port build with a truly empty file.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
plain not able to be fetched, then it should be removed from the
port system. There is no upside to keeping ports that will not build,
or cannot be fetched.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
all this time is a mark of it's worth.
I totally agree. While I do use portupgrade from time to time,
portmanager seems to fix problems that portupgrade can't and that
portmaster just makes worse. Plus, portmanager is much faster than
portmaster
Then again, that is just my 2¢.
--
Jerry
reconfigured the Samba
port to not build with it and then rebuilt the port.
Personally, I believe that WINBINDD should be OFF by default;
however, it is easy enough to configure the port not to build with it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
-0449e52.tar.gz
)etch: invalid size ( 99819 = Couldn't fetch it - please try to
retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again.
*** Error code 1
Attempting to fetch the file manually only results in this file being
found: pkgtools-pkgtools-2.4.9.4-0-g0449e52.tar.gz
--
Jerry
if that would work for you or not.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
The Wright Brothers weren't the first to fly, they were just the first
:
/usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions. Be sure to run make config in the
port prior to installing it. That also applies to the php5-5.3.13
port: /usr/ports/lang/php5, especially if you need support for
Apache. It is not built by default.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
will need to make some manual changes to the file yourself.
Pathetically, we are still forced to play games to get a simple sound
card to work while everyone else does it automatically.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
of that happening.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
|===
|===
|===
|===
|
Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
. CD to the /usr/ports/print/cups directory
and run: make clean. Next run: make install and see if the port
installs. You might want to create a log file of the
build/install routine. If the build fails again, post the log here.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
of the build/install
attempt but rather an extreme redaction of the entire process. Your
posting gives no clue what actually happened.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
|===
|===
|===
|===
|
I think way too far outside the box.
1) Computers let you make more mistakes faster than
as opposed to Sun's released versions. Since it appears that FreeBSD is
lagging behind, there is no reason to work on any of the intermediate
versions, but rather concentrate on the latest released version;
thereby benefiting its user base.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
is
that if the end user is not capable of fixing/correcting/modifying/etc
the product themselves, they should just keep their opinions to
themselves. Would I be paraphrasing your statement correctly?
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please
. Once you remember that, the rest is easy.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
POSITIVE: Being mistaken at the top of your voice
someone's system. If it comes down to fix it now or fix it
later, which do you think would be the more beneficial scenario?
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:12:43 +0100
Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de articulated:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:54:28 -0400
Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:26:03 +0100
Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de articulated:
Of course, this is just a hack and doesn't fix
port, or port directory given
=== Try portmaster --help
or portmaster -r graphics/png
Or: portmanager graphics/png -l -f
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
into that abyss.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
I will never lie to you
in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p248/ext/openssl.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p248.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18.
Script done on Sun Apr 4 04:01:17 2010
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:32:25 -0700, Stanislav Sedov s...@freebsd.org
articulated:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:23:29 -0400
Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net mentioned:
I have tried three times in the past 24 hours to build the
'lang/ruby18' port without success. This is on a FreeBSD-7.3
) and the fact that some of us work for a living, you
might want to give the port maintainer ga...@freebsd.org a break. I
am sure that he will attend to the matter in good time.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
Bash-4.1 was released on or about January 3, 2010. It is now at patch
level 5. I was just wondering if there are any plans to import it into
the ports system.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
on shared library: intl - found
=== Configuring for py26-BitTorrent-core-5.2.0_4,1
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
*** Error code 139
Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/py-bittorrent-core.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
?
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
In West Union, Ohio, No married man can go flying without his spouse
along at any time
clutters
up the ports system with more deprecated software. In any case, 4.1
corrects a few problems in the older version. I believe it is at patch
level 5 now, as your patch indicates.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
It has been several months now since Firefox-3.6.3 was released into
the ports system. Has a viable version of Java been created to work
with this version of Firefox? I am unable to locate any information in
regards to this on the FreeBSD web page.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
On Mon, 24 May 2010 20:07:41 +1000
Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org articulated:
On 2010-May-23 09:53:40 -0400, Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
It has been several months now since Firefox-3.6.3 was released into
the ports system. Has a viable version of Java been created
regarding it. However, since there is a dearth of drivers for any of the
newer chip sets that support the 'N' wireless protocol, it might well
be of limited usefulness.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:19:50 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de articulated:
Am 26.05.2010 22:24, schrieb Jerry:
I inquired about it a month or so ago. Other posters replied
favorable regarding it. However, since there is a dearth of drivers
for any of the newer chip sets
. Is there some
way to correct this seemingly unimportant issue? I have not found any
configuration that would correct it.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
)
Script done on Sun Jun 20 06:44:15 2010
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
COBOL: An exercise in Artificial
, or wait for the new version to be released into the ports system.
That is the last time I ever release anything late at night.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
I realize that everyone is busy with the soon to be released 8.1
update, etc; however, could ports/147840 please be committed. It is
required to correct a bug in the last released version of the program
that prevented it from running under certain conditions.
Thanks!
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u
of this error. The error that the
other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.1 i...@space.rootshell.ru...
Mail disabled for this domain (state 14).
The address did seem a little strange thought. In any case, does anyone
have an email address for this maintainer or has he also abandoned this
port?
--
Jerry
will notice the discrepancy with perl. This never occurred before.
Is there something wrong on my system or does the problem exist
elsewhere?
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:36:50 +0800
Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw articulated:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:13:39PM +0800, Denny Lin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 06:41:03AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
I just ran 'portsnap' to update my port tree, followed
by /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL
-PRERELEASE / amd64 system.
I am not familiar enough with the sufficiently knowledgeable about the
intricacies of gnome to update this port myself. I am hoping that
someone else would be willing to handle it.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
If possible, could someone please commit this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148364
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
.
Then again, perhaps we should just remove the handbook all together and
let everyone figure it out for themselves. No dumbing down at all
required. We certainly would not want to over do the 'friendly'
concept. I suppose some of use, you obviously, knew it all when you
started out.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd
Is there any chance that Dazuko could be updated. DazukoFS 3.1.3 is now
the official stable release. The port version is seriously deprecated,
dazuko-2.3.7 and it is marked as broken on FreeBSD = 8.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
. You
could also use: portmanager -u -p -l -y to accomplish the same goal.
Obviously, you should start with a fresh update of the ports tree.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
as it appears to
on the system it was written on, one can only imagine what sort of
problems await FreeBSD users.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
experience any problems described by you.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
that, that is extremely easy to deactivate?
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Sacred cows make great hamburgers.
signature.asc
.
*** Error code 1
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:04:51 -0400
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org articulated:
Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net writes:
There is an apparent size mismatch in the audio/espeak port:
and the date is more recent than the port change, as well.
Looks like the release
be
at all surprised to see 2.0.4 issued in a few days or so. Timo
mentioned it today in a post.
Waiting until the application stabilizes might not be such a bad idea.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:28:27 +0200
Mag. Werner Cyrmon w.cyr...@htlwrn.ac.at articulated:
squidclamav 5.4 is out a while - when will it appear in the ports
tree?
Have you considered contacting the port maintainer:
llev...@argosnet.com
Perhaps he could assist you.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd
a corresponding base system
counterpart; thereby, alerting the maintainer that he/she should test
against both versions to insure full compatibility.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
it enables.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
May you die in bed at 95, shot by a jealous spouse
tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done.
From time to time, portsnap' does that. It usually remedies itself
within 24 hours. Other than being a potential superficial annoyance, I
doubt that it causes any serious harm. I have noticed that #5 seems to
be the most troublesome server however.
--
Jerry
Are there any ports for the following two applications? I have not been
able to locate them if they exist.
http://www.sogo.nu/
http://www.openchange.org/
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
experienced this phenomena?
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 09:27:35 -0800
Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net articulated:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 09:16, Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
Has there been any work done on PR 151183
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151133?
I attempted to build it again
, at the expense of a lot of
gratuitous rebuilding.
I use 'portmanager' myself. It fixes a lot of problems that other
'update managers' seem to miss. Update your ports tree and then run:
portmanager mail/dovecot -l -f -y
That should get all of your dependencies corrected.
--
Jerry
ges
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
