--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
Poudriere logs are posted here:
https://zeno.apeiron.net/unison/test1
A.J. Fonz van Werven wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
to waste either your time, or valuable electrons.
Come now, electrons are overrated.
There's a lot of negativity over electrons here...
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
Got your message via the webform, tried to reply and got:
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: 553a7998.2090...@sorbs.net
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:12:56 +0200
From: Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net
To: portmas...@bsdforge.com
Matthew Donovan wrote:
You might want to look at
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/cperciva/portsnap-build/ might help you
with portsnap.
Fantastic! Exactly what I need.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports
Eitan Adler wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 15:48, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
I'd love to setup my own freebsd-update server - if only there were docs
about how to do it... I'd have done it a couple of months ago, Google
didn't reveal anything to me when I looked though
back to insecure protocols - though every freebsd-update
attempts to change this file back to the default... fortunately I have
puppet to reset the file in the event of me missing the update/reset.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd
Carmel NY wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:48:04 +0200, Michelle Sullivan stated:
Carmel NY wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated:
The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before
/usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an alias for commands like
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 13/06/2015 19:41, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
How about one for how to make your own portsnap ? :P
Presumably you're wanting to re-distribute local modifications to the
ports tree sources around your machines?
One relatively easy way to do that is to grab
that shared library is linked to
openssl from base, but none of the ports that I use appear to use
libfetch.
SSH would be the biggie that most security departments are scared of...
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 06/12/15 01:34, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Roger Marquis wrote:
The ports-secteam knows about this but posting here in case someone
wants to
update ahead of the port, from this morning's Hackernews:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150611.txt
*wonders how
Matt Smith wrote:
On Jun 13 13:13, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 13 Jun, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
SSH would be the biggie that most security departments are scared
of...
Well, ssh is available in ports, though I haven't checked to see
that it
picks up the correct version
Don Lewis wrote:
On 13 Jun, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
SSH would be the biggie that most security departments are scared of...
Well, ssh is available in ports, though I haven't checked to see that it
picks up the correct version of openssl.
Problem is it doesn't have 'overwrite
and 9.3 has 0.9.8zd in base - i expect 8.4 to get ignored as
it EoLs on Jun 30, 2015, but 9.3 EoLs on Dec 31, 2016)
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
about how to do it... I'd have done it a couple of months ago, Google
didn't reveal anything to me when I looked though...
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Michelle Sullivan wrote on 06/13/2015 14:29:
[...]
57 servers around the world that I have to maintain, patch and upgrade
at the same time as devel and maintain my applications... yeah I don't
do source stuff ;-)
It would be useful to have that option in freebsd
@colossus /usr/home/michelle]$ grep PKGNAMESUFFIX
/usr/ports/databases/pgpool-II-33/*
/usr/ports/databases/pgpool-II-33/Makefile:PKGNAMESUFFIX=33
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https
pkg_delete ) and installed 9.4 normally using '( cd
/usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-server make install )'
and now I can use pkg_upgrade ...
My failing point is ip4r 1.x - 2.x but that's a completely separate
issue in many ways... (and has it's own solutions).
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
it?)
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, but at the
moment pkg(8) and the ports are deeply entwined and there isn't much
useable documentation or prior art for how to do it 'by hand'.
Cheers,
Matthew
You need CATEGORIES += myports (or something similar) as well...
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
You need CATEGORIES += myports (or something similar) as well...
Michelle
Sorry I'm talking out of my butt
you can add a local top level add add it with CATEGORIES += local
and then add a makefile as Matthew indicated (without the .local
please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't self committing (those with the
commit bit committing their own patches without QA/review/adding
patchfiles to the PR) against the rules?... or is it just a free-for-all
now?
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 19 Jul 2015, at 14:02, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't self committing (those with the
commit bit
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 19 juillet 2015 23:20:11 +0200 Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net
wrote:
| No, he's either fixing that was broken,
|
| So you're saying anything that is deemed broken can be changed/fixed
| without the maintainer's comment or approval?
Sure, we do it all
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 19 juillet 2015 14:02:53 +0200 Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net
wrote:
| please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't self committing (those with the
| commit bit committing their own patches without QA/review/adding
| patchfiles to the PR) against the rules
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 19 juillet 2015 22:30:45 +0200 Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net
wrote:
| In fact what I am working on is enforcing openssl (or libressl at user
| choice) from ports directly (which is why I worked on the ports in the
| first place - after someone complained
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 19 Jul 2015, at 14:02, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't self committing (those with the
commit bit committing their own patches without QA/review/adding
patchfiles to the PR) against the rules?... or is it just
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 06:44:26PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 19 Jul 2015, at 14:02, Michelle Sullivan
a new production
environment.)
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:15:27PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
That is where your proposal will not work for us that have massive
production infrastructure...without modification... sounds very debianish.
Here's my thought
server
and the new client connecting to the old server. They are rare and only
usually affect the use of 'short cut' commands (ie things like: \d and
\dt in the client)... the connection itself is usually both backwards
and forwards compatible just not the commands.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http
everything would build as well, but that isn't the case
either.
IIRC the point is it stops the targets and dependencies being a moving
target and you can standardise across all your machines the same
non-buildable ports.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
.html
-> It is expected that PORTEPOCH will not be used for the majority of
ports, and that sensible use of PORTVERSION can often preempt it
becoming necessary if a future release of the software changes the
version structure.
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
correct way to do it, and the
second is legacy that may not have any effect now.
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=apache=2.4 perl5=5.16 pgsql=9.4
PERL5_DEFAULT=5.16
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebs
l be added at the end of May when
>>> released, and switched to at the beginning of September.
>> mod_perl is still broken with 5.22. Which is very sad. So maybe
>> it's premature to switch the default ?
>>
>
>
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
l be added at the end of May when
>>> released, and switched to at the beginning of September.
>> mod_perl is still broken with 5.22. Which is very sad. So maybe
>> it's premature to switch the default ?
>>
>
>
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
is being called to
shutdown and there is some permissions issue on the PID file (I see the
same thing with bucardo when running bucardo as non root)
Regards,
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
ripts should not fail if it is undefined.
+1 to that.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
this
> is just an ugly hack.
>
> Can some expert trow a little light on this? Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
Try adding:
USES+= compiler
to the makefile first...
(and it still has some issues but that should solve the first)
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
_
care of
it as it's probably a change in default behavior that has caused the
mess... how many are we talking about? 10+, 100+, 1000+?
Regards,
Michelle
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> ---
> José Pérez
>
> El 2015-10-02 02:29, Michelle Sullivan escribió:
>>
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> José Pérez wrote:
>
>> Hi Michelle,
>> thank you for your suggestion. Is this another workaround?
>>
>
> As far as I was aware if you need Uses/compiler.mk it should be
> specified (there are params if a particular compiler/fea
updated along with it, and mark it 'affects many'...
hopefully someone will take the time to pick it up and fix it.
Regards,
Michelle
>
> Regards,
>
> ---
> José Pérez
>
> El 2015-10-04 12:56, Michelle Sullivan escribió:
>> Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>> José Pé
now off to get ready, wish me luck and I'll deal with all of this
when back from honeymoon. ;-)
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
st wanted to get the mail done so I
could forget about it.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
ld be good but don't see it happening.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
someone goes makes blanket
changes which actually breaks stuff.. that reflects on the person in the
Maintainer line - whether you want it to do so or not, whether you
believe it or not..
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd
project to analyze the ports system "Maintainer
> email address" to see just what would be involved in populating it
> with a dummy value so every place it is viewable to the public the
> real content is masked, this includes the down loadable ports tree.
>
I'd rather give peo
ING. This is another sign that something
> is deeply wrong. Any software management solution that does not kill
> /usr/ports/UPDATING forever is insufficient.
>
Personally I think the system should be usable without /usr/ports at
all which funnily enough is (was) the case before pkg
erkeleyDB .. oh wait, nevermind... how
about going the whole hog and putting in a registry...that'll work,
somewhere to store those pesky DWORDs so you could move rc.conf there as
well... oh and the registry of installed ports there as well...
No further comment necessary.
--
Michelle Sull
onths) in the "you're going to use this now
whether you like it or not and whether it works or not phase".. since
then I've made the ports system work with pkg_tools again so no longer
have anything to do with pkg. Its a good stop-gap until I can get the
build environment integrated into
Steven Hartland wrote:
> On 14/02/2016 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> My experience is that pkg(8) has been wonderfully robust since 1.3.
>>> before
>>> 1.3 it was a real pain in the neck, though I never had a need to
>>&
t;>
>
> And now the fully circle. This is FreeBSD's Godwin's law. You know the
> discussion is over when somebody says that "[issue] of the day" is the
> root cause of BSD being eclipsed by Linux. Since I've heard [issue]
> replaced about 200 times, I'm kind of do
with this... except...
pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os
thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports..
So sorry don't claim it's only part of the ports system, because whilst
it maybe built and administered there, the tools it replaced were
removed from th
John Marino wrote:
> On 2/15/2016 9:40 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I'd agree with this... except...
>>
>> pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os
>> thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports..
>>
>> So sor
Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2/15/16 3:40 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> John Marino wrote:
>>> On 2/15/2016 6:32 PM, Roger Marquis wrote:
>>>
>>>>> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases.
>>>>>
; know about that.
>
> HTH,
>
> AvW
>
>
You know you can all run your own portsnap server to allow you to
include local changes?
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.fre
les which I currently
publish on a publicly accessible server so my own servers can get it.
So if you have the time and/or desire/or need, you can create your own
portsnap distributable tree with your own version of ports.
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www
default to pkg for a bit. Much as I like it, it
> really was not ready for prime time when it became the default. The early
> issues chased too many people away. E.g. you.
>
Nailed it!
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@
built that way if using the ports version is mandated), and do not
compile against OpenSSL 1.1.x. Most can no doubt be patched, but
waiting for upstream providers to do so may be problematic, and many
porters lack the skills.
Personally I'm surprised there is
configure... that
said.. you have the same problem even if you have USE_OPENSSL_PORTS
defined anyhow...)
There are grey areas, and I guess it will be like that for 9.x.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
uld the
default for 9.3 probably be something else like gnutls or polarssl ?
OPENSSL from Ports is newer and will compile on 9.3amd64... the base
OpenSSL is too old and 9.3 is legacy... according to re@
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
free
endency/library issues that could happen.
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
le until someone changes compile options.)
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
but looks a *lot* better now. Would
be interested as to an explanation of why the distinction between the
two... especially as the port is 'broken' if you try and compile it
against the wrong version of SSL... Mathieu?
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
things now the ports tree is
unusable and quarterlies are unusable because they contain known
security issues in most cases which will never be backported "Because
its too hard".. According to the same email thread the answer to the
question there was to migrate to 10.2-BETA2 in the p
Don Lewis wrote:
On 28 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
I'd thought that poudriere was using the host copy of pkg to do the
final part of the respository build, but since poudriere doesn't list
pkg as a dependency, that appears not to be the case. It looks like
poudriere
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
After a portsnap update it seems all my jails won't build the current tree
returning the following error:
>> MOVED: sysutils/puppet renamed to sysutils/puppet38
>&g
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
After a portsnap update it seems all my jails
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
After a portsnap update
Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
After a portsnap update it seems all my jails won't build the current tre
/local/bin/automake-1.15' not found.
>> Umounting file systems
Checked updating but don't see anything to suggest that port origins of
'/usr/local/bin/ccache' are normal..
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Michelle Sullivan
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
w
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Apr, Rick Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
h file or directory:
'/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst'
The full traceback has been saved in /tmp/sphinx-err-1UMMZi.log, if you want to
report the issue to the developers.
Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message
can be provided next time.
A bug report can be filed in the tracker at
<https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues>. Thanks!
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/llvm37
[1;33m>>[0;0m [1;33mWarning: Leftover processes:
[0;0mUSER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTEDTIME COMMAND
build of devel/llvm37 ended at Mon May 2 22:27:28 CEST 2016
build time: 24:19:52
!!! build failure encountered !!!
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
confused.
I will re-run the single port in my poudriere oven, as well with DOCS
disabled, and report back.
matthias
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
upon the number of ports you actually need to work
with. This approach may be worth it. A determination, only *you*
can decide. :)
More than one person has done this already (myself included)
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
?
No comment :P
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
, freebsd-update to the
latest and then update the ports or erase and start again... Sorry for
your pain.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net
<mailto:miche...@sorbs.net>> wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Interesting question. Perl was removed from the base
system years ago
with no
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Interesting question. Perl was removed from the base system years ago
with no ill affects.
ssh ...?
Do ssh use ssl protocol?
Actually I don't know, just takign a wild stab in the dark.. certainly
fetch etc as others have already pointed out.
Michelle
--
Michelle
))
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
recommend ALL
users who are still on FreeBSD 9.x to use port version of OpenSSL.
Did that a long time ago when I realised how FreeBSD actually supports
the people using it instead of the developers.. not that it worries me
now, shortly I won't have any FreeBSD hosts.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http
KEN on OSVERSION > X with that option?
___
I would suggest that is the correct way to do it.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/m
deploy and get nailed... remote access only via SSH and no SU on
non console etc..)
And I am not sure that this is a problem of poudriere. I think it's
rather issue in ports options framework. Isn't it?
Correct (but also poudriere wouln't get the change either.)
--
Michelle Sullivan
http
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 29 juin 2016 13:15:44 +0200 Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net>
wrote:
| Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
|> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
|>>
|>> And I do think we should, opposite to what you are proposing, make th
you think is important is a short sighted
and unprofessional methodology as it creates more uncertainty and
confusion..
My opinion, feel free to ignore as usual.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
... and with stuff fixed
that was just marked BROKEN on FreeBSD 9.x... Of course thats for my
package/patch set so YMMV and there are a lot that are not upgraded to
the current FreeBSD set - but then it's only me on it.
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:51:41AM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Tell me What is the reason for me upgrading those few production
servers from 9.3 to 10/11?... bearing in mind the following:
There isn't any ... oh, except for no new security updates.
But that's
desktop
which funnily enough is using guess what... a BSD Kernel!.,,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
p**sed off
in reality they can't keep up with the OS updates that they migrate away...
FreeBSD seems to have entered (trying to enter) the desktop market...
good luck competing with Apple and Microsoft... I guess FreeBSD will be
the next Solaris.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://ww
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:02:41PM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Or the last strong hold you have - the server owners - get so p**sed off in
reality they can't keep up with the OS updates that they migrate away...
So we should give up on EFI, 4k drives, and SSD
Vlad K. wrote:
The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable"
packages that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and
security fixes. That is the theory and intent behind the branch. In
practice, however:
1. The Q branch is cut off at predetermined dates (ie.
Matthieu Volat wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:31:22 +0100
list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
Although
Julian Elischer wrote:
Some friends and I have a pdp8 here.. we replaed the bulbs with leds
about 25 years ago, but
last time we tried it, it still ran.. model number escapes me.. its
currently at a friend's place.
It was the controller for a DISTEC (?) display, the predecessor for
the
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
This one can easily be compiled:
tingo@kg-core1$ mkdir focal
tingo@kg-core1$ cd focal
tingo@kg-core1$ fetch ftp://www.cozx.com/pub/langs/focal.tar.gz
focal.tar.gz 100% of 42 kB 116 kBps 00m00s
untar, then
tingo@kg-core1$ cd
Dave Horsfall wrote:
(Many responses)
I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the
message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being removed
automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point...
I didn't and some of the answers are helpful even if
Julian Elischer wrote:
So this seems to be a speciality of mine.
I often find that I need a ports tree at rev X except for some port
foo/bar that needs to be at some different rev (Y) to pick up a
fix/change needed by the application. Now there is no reason that I
can't just edit the
's exactly what I did
as well... you get the idea.. don't argue for it, just do it yourself
its a lot less of a waste of energy and you get exactly what you want/need.
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
101 - 200 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
