Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE

On 04 May 2021, at 09:00, Ronald Klop wrote: > On 5/4/21 4:10 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to >> reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the ports >> and then stepping through that l

Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE

With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It was very inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the list, of course, were dependent

Re: Python update 3.7->3.8

On 26 Apr 2021, at 20:43, Rozhuk Ivan wrote: > This long command hanle files that requires shebang: > portmaster -BvD -y --no-confirm --delete-build-only `grep -rsp "\/python3\.7" > /usr/local/ | grep -v '/usr/local/man/' | grep -v '/usr/local/lib/python3' | > sed -e 's|:.*||' -e 's|Binary file

Re: Mariabackup core dump

On 20 Apr 2021, at 11:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> >> >> This was posted 3 years ago, and I am having the identical issue. From what >> I can see on that page, no activity has taken place. Anyone have any ideas? >> >> (It does seem to work fine if

Mariabackup core dump

This was posted 3 years ago, and I am having the identical issue. From what I can see on that page, no activity has taken place. Anyone have any ideas? (It does seem to work fine if you give the full path, but needless to say, I'm slightly concerned

Re: gitup issues [was Re: No update for a day on ports?]

On 10 Apr 2021, at 19:34, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports wrote: > On 2021-Apr-01 22:36:02 +1100, Trev wrote: > > One consequence is that gitup is unusable > on small memory environments - in my case, I saw peak memory usage hit > 5GB (though the largest file I have is 1.8GB, so I'm not sure

gitup on two machines

I have tow machines, both on 12.2-RELEASE Running `gitup ports` on one server updates the ports tree. Running the the same command with the same configuration (pointing at the GitHub mirror in both cases) just sits there with no feedback and does nothing, even if I run it with a -v 2 flag.

Re: gitip usage.

On 04 Apr 2021, at 10:46, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote: > running 12.2 STABLE, Curious, why are you not running the RELEASE version of 12.2? -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain. But Trojans won’t arrive on the scene for another 300 years."

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 01 Apr 2021, at 01:54, Milan Obuch wrote: > This is unpleasant move for me. This means git or equivalent (and > dependencies) must be installed on any box where tracking ports tree is > planned/needed... and no tool like svnlite could be expected in base > system for some time. You only need

Re: Deprecation of portsnap (was: Proposed ports git transition schedule)

On 01 Apr 2021, at 04:19, Felix Palmen wrote: > * Christoph Moench-Tegeder [20210326 19:45]: >> ## Felix Palmen (fe...@palmen-it.de): >>> I'd assume (someone may correct me) that portsnap will still be >>> supported, >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119098.html

Re: Lessons from the PHP git repo "hack"

On 31 Mar 2021, at 12:02, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > I've found passwords checked into public Github repos more than once. I > don't equate Github with security. Have you also found the code necessary to replicate a 2FA token checked in to a GitHub repo? -- I WILL NOT DO THE DIRTY BIRD Bart

Re: Lessons from the PHP git repo "hack"

On 31 Mar 2021, at 07:58, Felix Palmen wrote: > * @lbutlr [20210331 07:47]: >> Which brings me to the reason for this post, as it seems that the >> ports collection of FreeBSD 13.x will be in the same position, running >> a private git server network and using GitHub as

Lessons from the PHP git repo "hack"

As you may know, PHP has decided to move their repo to GitHub after an unauthorized "hack" was committed to PHP. I say "hack" because it appears the code was intentionally obvious and went to some lengths to draw attention to itself, so it appears someone did this to highlight issues with the

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

On 27 Mar 2021, at 08:20, Felix Palmen wrote: > I'm talking about net/gitup, which is a little C program with > *no* dependencies and definitely no python involved. If you don't have > it in your ports tree, upgrade your ports tree. Just for clarity sakes, running gitup ports wight now would

Re: Port: astro/sunclock: Malaysia is in the wrong time zone

On 20 Mar 2021, at 21:31, Erich Dollansky wrote: > I just noticed that Malaysia is in the same time zone as Jawa > (Indonesia) and Thailand. Wikipedia says for Malaysia UTC+8 and for > Jawa and Thailand UTC + 7. The time zone amp around Malaysia is very odd, but it appears to NOT share the

Re: Problem with some gnustep ports after upgrade from 12.1 to 12.2

On 12 Mar 2021, at 21:32, Edwin Ancaer wrote: > $ sudo pkg install gnumail > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. > pkg: No packages available to install matching 'gnumail' have been found in > the repositories > > Out of

Re: editors/libreoffice fails to build after misc/box2d update

On 08 Mar 2021, at 01:49, Serpent7776 wrote: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:44:29 +1300 > Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library: libBox2D.so - not >> found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/Box2D-2.4.1.txz >> Installing Box2D-2.4.1... >>

Re: When did pkg(8) drop support for 12-STABLE?

On 23 Feb 2021, at 16:31, Chris wrote: > It was from a 12-STABLE usb stick (probably 12.1). Is there no way forward, > save > building up to 12.2? It sounds like the version you want is -RELEASE, not -STABLE. Think of -STABLE as "We are still working on this, but we THINK it's stable" as

Re: When did pkg(8) drop support for 12-STABLE?

On 23 Feb 2021, at 13:26, Chris wrote: > OK On a virgin 12 stable install. The current release is 12.2-RELEASE. 12.0-RELEASE was EOLed last February. I am not sure what build you mean by "12-STABLE" Are you on the http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable mailing list? --

Re: My dumper failure

On 27 Jan 2021, at 08:08, @lbutlr wrote: > # uname -rs > FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p1 I finally had some down time, so I did a postmaster -rR databases/mydumper This resintalled 86 ports and then still failed to complete mydumper. Here is more of the error FAILED: CMakeFiles/myload

My dumper failure

# uname -rs FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p1 Portmaster build of my dumper fails: [6/10] /usr/bin/cc -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wunused -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wextra

Pinentry

I ma trying to figure out why pin entry and pinetnry-tty are installed. If I try to remove it, I get a list of post that are to be deleted. Installed packages to be REMOVED: gnupg: 2.2.27 gpgme: 1.15.1 mimedefang: 2.83_3 mutt: 2.0.4 pinentry: 1.1.0_7

iperf checksums?

When trying to install iperf: ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for benchmarks/iperf <<<=== fetch: https://freefr.dl.sourceforge.net/project/iperf2/iperf-2.0.14a.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 370518, actual 373268 => Attempting to fetch

Re: Bind master error on empty.db

On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:52, Chris wrote: > As an aside; why the enormous SPAM header? My milter was misconfigured (again) to not acknowledge that outbound messages were submitted via authenticated submission, so it tagged my mail as being from a dynamic address (correct) before passing it along.

Re: Bind master error on empty.db

On 29 Oct 2020, at 15:37, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Do you use named_chrootdir? No. -- Ghosts prefer empty bottles that we've all drunk. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Bind master error on empty.db

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.covisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see ad...@covisp.net for details. Content preview:

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

On 05 Aug 2020, at 04:59, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > 2) Should portsnap be a wrapper for GIT/SVN whatever is used? Yes, this seems like a very obvious thing to do as it will minimize disruption for the most users. Not everyone has any use for git our any need to learn git syntax. A

Re: Portmaster and less

On 31 Jul 2020, at 14:24, @lbutlr wrote: > Is there anyway to change this behavior so that less is called with -E / > --QUIT-AT_EOF? Never mind, I dididn’t think of it as a user-level issue. export MANPAGER='less -s -X -F' export PAGER='less -s -X -F' -- Against stupidity th

Portmaster and less

When postmaster displays the package messages after installing, it calls less, which forces you to hit 'q' to exit, and when you quit less, it clear the buffer on the screen and returns you to the display of the compile process. Is there anyway to change this behavior so that less is called

Re: Changing what version Poudriere builds

On 07 Jul 2020, at 17:37, @lbutlr wrote: > Poudriere is trying to built/update bind9.14 instead of bind9.16, which is > current. How do I tell it to get bind 9.16 instead? Never mind, the wrong ports tree was updated. Or at least no the one I expected. -- and I swear it happene

Changing what version Poudriere builds

Poudriere is trying to built/update bind9.14 instead of bind9.16, which is current. How do I tell it to get bind 9.16 instead? (Yes, the ports tree is updated). -- "He is not only dull himself; he is the cause of dullness in others." Samuel Johnson

Re: Updating py27-* ports

On 04 Jul 2020, at 08:30, Carmel wrote: > I see that you are putting it all on one line. That is probably easier. > I like the separate entries technique simply because I find it easier > to read myself or quickly comment out an entry. I agree that separate lines have advantages. When making

Re: Reminder: freedb.org (CDDB) has shut down

On 01 Jul 2020, at 09:14, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > (On OpenBSD I extracted all ports and grepped over the sources, which > revealed some 35 affected ports. > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=159346807907595=2 > I don't have the resources to do this on FreeBSD.) I did a quick and dirty

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

On 16 Jun 2020, at 14:55, Larry Rosenman wrote: > sysutils/lsof ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES /usr/src to be able to build. Is there a list of the files in src that it requires? Can I delete the rest? (Tranferring 1.5GB is far less of an issue than keeping 1.5GB around). -- Get in there you big furry

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

> On 17 Jun 2020, at 07:35, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 17/06/2020 04:23, @lbutlr wrote: >> Thank you, cleared /usr/src and running the svn checkout with that >> URL now. It's still well over a gig so it will be a few minutes >> before trying to build lsof again. &

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

On 16 Jun 2020, at 21:14, George Mitchell wrote: > On 2020-06-16 23:12, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 2020-06-16 23:10, @lbutlr wrote: >>> [...] >>> Needless to say, I was expecting that checkout would give me 12.1, but I >>> don't see how to get t

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

On 16 Jun 2020, at 06:40, Mike Bristow wrote: > What is the output of "egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' > /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh" ? Well, this seems like it might be bad: # egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh TYPE="FreeBSD" REVISION="13.0"

Lsof port can't build (again)

When trying to update lsof on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p5 GENERIC i386 I get the following fatal error: /usr/src/sys/sys/pcpu.h:224:10: fatal error: 'machine/pcpu_aux.h' file not found #include ^~~~ After doing some searching $(find / -type d -name machine), I found a

Json-c, bind, and updating

This has happened in the past, but it happened again this weekend when an update to ;ibjson-c did not update bind, rendering bind unable to load libjson-c.so.4 because it had been replaced with libjson-c.so.5. In a rush I simply linked libjson-c.so.4 -> libjson-c.so.5 and all is happy AFAICT.

Re: mail/mailman v3?

>> AIUI you can move your entire archive to the new system. > > There are many thousand links to the freebsd pipermail archives, > and invalidating all those links sounds like a serious loss of institutional > memory. As I said in the pat of my message you snipped, you do not have to remove

Re: mail/mailman v3?

On 28 Apr 2020, at 14:00, Chris wrote: > as at *least* it completely abandons the previous archive system. Pipermail was… lacking. It looked 20 years old (because it was). > Making your previous archive, an archive of an archive. AIUI you can move your entire archive to the new system. You can

Re: mail/mailman v3?

On 28 Apr 2020, at 09:33, Matthias Andree wrote: > Leaving Python 3.x compatibility aside, But that is the main issue. Python 2.7 is dead. Well, fine, it’s not quite dead yet, but it is also not feeling any better. (I ran mailman lists for many years, but never made the move to mailman 3 and

Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and EOL while 2.7.18 RC is available

On 27 Apr 2020, at 17:32, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > qt5-webengine There is py-qt5-webengine which seems to want py37 -- "Remember -- that which does not kill us can only make us stronger." "And that which *does* kill us leaves us *dead*!”

Re: Linux-foldingathome

On 07 Apr 2020, at 06:36, Yuri Pankov wrote: > @lbutlr wrote: >> # service fahclient start >> Starting fahclient. >> 13:33:52:WARNING:Exception: Failed to open '/proc/bus/pci/devices': Failed >> to open '/proc/bus/pci/devices': No such file or directory: No such fil

Linux-foldingathome

Has anyone had any experience with installing the port biology/linux-foldingathome? After installing it and editing the configuration file I try to start it and get the following: # service fahclient start Starting fahclient. 13:33:52:WARNING:Exception: Failed to open '/proc/bus/pci/devices':

Re: lsof marked ignored

On 20 Mar 2020, at 15:30, @lbutlr wrote: > PORTS+MODULE=sysutils/lsof Oops. -- Say, give it up, give it up, television's taking its toll That's enough, that's enough, gimme the remote control I've been nice, I've been good, please don't do this to me Turn it off, t

Re: lsof marked ignored

On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:10, Robert Huff wrote: > Adam Weinberger writes: > >>> ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 >>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof >>> >>>===>>> This port is marked IGNORE >>>===>>> requires kernel sources >> >> That error

lsof marked ignored

Got this when trying tu update lsof: ===>>> lsof-4.93.2_9,8 ===>>> New version available: lsof-4.93.2_10,8 ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> requires kernel sources

Re: Aria2 and magnets

On 05 Mar 2020, at 06:54, @lbutlr wrote: > I’ve tried the magnet (and other magnets) several times. The first time I > tried a magnet link there was an error, but that is sort of documented for > araia2 and subsequent attempts do not generate an error about DHT, but they > do

Re: Aria2 and magnets

> On 05 Mar 2020, at 06:08, RW via freebsd-ports > wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:19:06 -0700 > @lbutlr wrote: > >> Brand new install of aria2 and I tried to grab the FreBSD 12.1 amd64 >> image via a magnet link: > ... >> After about 30 minutes th

Aria2 and magnets

Brand new install of aria2 and I tried to grab the FreBSD 12.1 amd64 image via a magnet link: # aria2c 'magnet:?xt=urn:btih:da22f9b3339bf44c0a2e33626658873253b67f8d=FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img’ After about 30 minutes the only thing I get is updates showing 0 Bytes downloaded.

Re: Good CLI BitTorrent client?

On 04 Mar 2020, at 08:44, nonamel...@ukr.net wrote: > There is also rtorrent, but I recommend aria2. That has a shockingly small number of deps, definitely giving that a try. Thanks everyone! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Good CLI BitTorrent client?

Sice people are talking about GUI botttorrent clients, are there decent ones that are CLI? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Starting with poudriere

On 16 Feb 2020, at 02:02, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/121-default-make.conf And this conf file applies when you use the jail named exactly “121-default”? So for my jail named 121x64 the conf file would be "121x64-make.conf" And for 113x86 "113x86-make.conf" Ok, this is

Re: Starting with poudriere

On 15 Feb 2020, at 21:43, Dan McGrath wrote: > You would run "poudriere bulk", then sit back sipping coffee while it > churns through all of the packages. Hang on a second, so the intended use for poudriere is to build ALL packages? Right now I have two jails setup, one for 12.1 amd64 and one

Re: Starting with poudriere

On 15 Feb 2020, at 16:32, @lbutlr wrote: > Sorry for the rather basic questions. Thanks everyone for your comments. One more dumb question I can’t find the answer to. Let’s say I want to build and install a single port via poudrier. For the same of argument some port that has configurat

Starting with poudriere

I’ve setup a new FreeBSD 12.1 system and am going to give poudriere a whirl on it. The machine is currently setup as a two drive zfs mirror and I have used pkg to install a few basic things (sudo, zsh, poudriere itself, etc). I am reading through

Re: OpenSSL multiple names?

On 07 Feb 2020, at 11:06, @lbutlr wrote: > I updated openssl in January, and as I said it has been recompiled several > times To be clear, I did everything that UPDATING 20200101 mentions, including reinstalling all ports, changing make.conf, etc. But all along, the system has re

Re: OpenSSL multiple names?

two forms “openssl-1.1.1d,1” and “openssl111-1.1.1f” is new. > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:41:19PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> When trying to port upgrade mariadb it reinstalled openssl (just about >> everything for the last month has reinstalled openssl) >> >> I get

OpenSSL multiple names?

When trying to port upgrade mariadb it reinstalled openssl (just about everything for the last month has reinstalled openssl) I get this after a successful build ===> Registering installation for openssl-1.1.1d,1 Installing openssl-1.1.1d,1... pkg-static: openssl-1.1.1d,1 conflicts with

Re: Portmaster failing

On 01 Jan 2020, at 16:57, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Ok, let’s stop there. Nobody is going to get fired, and insulting What? No, seriously, what? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: Portmaster failing

On 01 Jan 2020, at 15:28, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> If FreeBSD is going to REQUIRE poudriere, then go ahead and do >> so. If not, then the other packages managers and the ports tree >> itself have to work without screwing the admin, failing to build >> for inexplicable reasons, inputting a dependency

Re: Portmaster failing

ing to build for inexplicable reasons, inputting a dependency that breaks other packages, or my favorite, failing to update dependencies. > I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about > encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) > frustration is

Re: Portmaster failing

On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:46, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > >> On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> >> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote: >>> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has become >>> security

Re: Portmaster failing

On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote: > security/openssl111 has become security/openssl. I have /usr/ports/security/openssl111 and no /usr/ports/security/openssl which doesn’t sound like what you said. -- 'Pcharn'kov!' Footnote: 'Your feet shall be cut off and be buried

Re: Portmaster failing

On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote: > security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has become > security/openssl. Ugh. > A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private trees, don't > we. ;) This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to

Portmaster failing

Portmaser -L errors out with make: "/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk" line 97: You are using an unsupported SSL provider openssl Make.conf: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl apache=2.4 php=7.2 perl5=5.28 mysql=10.1m Worked fine on Saturday, maybe Friday. -- i wasn't born a programmer. i became one

Cannot update gnupg

checking whether "make check" shall run all tests... no configure: *** *** The system does not provide a working iconv function. Please *** install a suitable library; for example GNU Libiconv which is *** available at: *** https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libiconv/ *** configure: error: *** ***

Re: Checking you the maintainer of a port?

On 27 Nov 2019, at 14:05, Janky Jay, III wrote: > Please see the "MAINTAINER=" line in the port's "Makefile”. Aw hell, I should have gripped all the files. I was sure it would’t be in the make file! -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, but where is a fish?”

Checking you the maintainer of a port?

I thought that the maintainer of a port was listed somewhere in the files at user/ports//portbase/ but evidently not. What is the easiest way to find out, sitting in console on a server without a GUI, to find out who the maintainer is? (On my desktop I can just google and launch a browser, but

Re: MariaDB 10.1.42?

On 10 Nov 2019, at 15:26, j...@mailman-hosting.com wrote: > On Nov 10, 2019, 4:24 PM -0500, @lbutlr , wrote: >> Any idea when we might see MariaDB 10.1.42 to counter >> <https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/fc91f2ef-fd7b-11e9-a1c7-b499baebfeaf.html>? > According to https://m

MariaDB 10.1.42?

Any idea when we might see MariaDB 10.1.42 to counter ? (It’s been a week). -- A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: Omg upgrade wants to install MySQL

On 02 Nov 2019, at 20:29, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 03.11.2019 9:20, @lbutlr wrote: > >> On 02 Nov 2019, at 19:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>> I prefer third option. Sometimes it is handy to "pkg lock" packages you >>> installed from ports buiklt with non

Omg upgrade wants to install MySQL

I have mariadb101 (client and server) installed, but when looking at what pkg update will do, one of the things it will do is install MySQL. Is there something I need to do to tell it to use MariaDB instead? Since I am here, it also wants to install a bunch of X11 packages, but I neither want

Re: Rebuild between dot versions?

On 8 Sep 2019, at 14:56, Adam Weinberger wrote: > You meant when > updating FreeBSD to new minors. No, it's not strictly necessary, > though you absolutely should rebuild anything that installs a KLD. > Compiler improvements usually happen in minor releases, so you > certainly won't get that

Re: Rebuild between dot versions?

On 8 Sep 2019, at 15:12, Pau Amma wrote: > On Sun, September 8, 2019 8:24 pm, @lbutlr wrote: >> Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current patch >> level is of a release? > > Assuming you mean "the highest patch level available for that ve

Rebuild between dot versions?

Is it necessary to rebuild ports when moving from dot versions (like 11.2 tp 11.3)? Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current patch level is of a release? -- Why would I ever want to go outside the Beltway? ___

Re: ruby25 from ports will not compile

On 6 Sep 2019, at 19:16, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: "@lbutlr" > Subject: ruby25 from ports will not compile > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:44:29 -0600 > >> Trying to update ruby on 11.2-RELEASE-p11 (I have also tried to switch to >> ruby26 with basically

Re: ruby25 from ports will not compile

On 6 Sep 2019, at 13:30, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--disable-dtrace Shouldn’t [ ] DSIABLE DEBUG do that? I added the suggested line to make.conf and did make clean && make and same results. -- Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the

ruby25 from ports will not compile

Trying to update ruby on 11.2-RELEASE-p11 (I have also tried to switch to ruby26 with basically the same results)  # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby25  # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes install vm.c:(.text+0x1e0bb): undefined reference to `__dtraceenabled_ruby___method__entry' vm.c:(.text+0x1e0ef):

A port like pi-hole?

I’ve been running pi-hole on my home LAN and would like to run something like it on my FreeBSD machines as well. There isn’t a pi-hole port, but is there something like it that lets you easily setup blacklists to block DNS queries for adware/malware servers? -- There is no Humpty Dumpty,

Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 846, Issue 7

On 18 Aug 19, at 06:23 , Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Sunday, 18 August 2019 14:00:01 CEST freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org > wrote: >>> So I hoped to collect experiences on this. >> >> I was favorably impressed by Otter Browser, but have not been able to update >> because my FreeBSD

Re: PHP version retirement

On 12 Aug 19, at 01:04 , Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > So, I find it wrong to say, as I understood you, to remove a package from the > ports tree because otherwise others people, for instance users of FreeBSD, > would have the *expectation* of receiving support for those packages. There is not

Re: firefox

On 11 Aug 2019, at 20:29, bruce wrote: > I have tried firefox. It crashes regularly That doesn’t sound right. If Firefox is crashing a lot there is something not quite right with your system or install. Seamonkey was last update a bit over a year ago. That’s about a decade in Browser time.

Re: need help with python

On 4 Jul 2019, at 20:39, AN wrote: > I do not use python directly, only as dependencies. It seems python36 is > default now. What is the correct procedure to set ports to use python36 so I > can safely delete python27? Rebuild all the ports that depend on python (and any python depends on).

Re: portsnap broken?

On 2 Jul 2019, at 18:33, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > I noticed portsnap mirror is outdated for few hours now: Out of date based on what? How often are you pulling portsnap? (I run portsnap cron update once a day) -- THEY ARE LAUGHING AT ME, NOT WITH ME Bart chalkboard Ep. 7G12

Re: Cleaning up pkg-message

On 9 Jun2019, at 09:33, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Because pkg doesn't know if it's a first install or reinstall. This is a solvable issue, however. There are may things that could be checked to see if this is a new install or not, though some go them will require some additional tracking pf

Re: net/xrdp: Issue(s) with Channels/Clipboard.

On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Janky Jay, III wrote: > I had to do a "portsnap fetch extract" and install audio/lame via ports > to get this to work. Now I have a full ports environment for just one > dependency. It's a small VM that is only used for certain things so I > try to use space sparingly.

Re: net/xrdp: Issue(s) with Channels/Clipboard.

On Jun 5, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Janky Jay, III wrote: > So, this needed to be built from ports. I > would imagine that these are important to people using sound (I am not) > so some audio dependencies should remain. However, I'm not sure it > should be "audio/lame" if there is not a package available

Vim 8.1 failing to update

Vim 8.1 is failing to update from vim-8.1.1248 after trying to install /usr/ports/editors/vim/files/vietnamese_viscii.vim Why is it trying to install this? I have no need for vitnekmese and don’t see anything in make config that mentions Vietnamese or any "alternate alphabet" language. That

Re: Dovecot packages

On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie wrote: > It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and > dovecot2 package has remained stagnant. You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE. I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your ports tree

Re: ImageMacgick6 seems to conflict with itself

On 29 Apr 2019, at 17:34, bob prohaska wrote: > By the time I fell into the trap, the old ImageMagick directory > had been renamed to ImageMagick6, I've run into this many times of the years with many packages. It is always extreme annoying and I can't see any reason for this behavior.

Re: ltmain.sh not found

On 25 Apr 2019, at 07:14, Willem Offermans wrote: > When I have time, I will dig into poudriere. I assume there is > documentation/tutorial around that will get me going. > The man pages will also be helpful. Loos like and

Re: Suggestion to split games category into games-console, games-engine and games

On 20 Apr 2019, at 14:30, Sid wrote: > > /usr/ports/games is already very large. > What about splitting up games in the ports tree into games, games-console and > games-engine? What about a configure file or option to exclude certain branches of the ports tree os I don't have to keep

postfix and postfix-current

I see today that ===>>> postfix-current-3.4.20190106,5 ===>>> New version available: postfix-current-3.5.20190330,5 What is the proper way to move from postfix-current-3.4.20190106,5 to postfix-3.4.5 (mail/postfix)? I was on postfix current because the root postfix had not updated to the

port configuration diff with defaults

Is there a way to check if a port is using the default config (make config) and if not, to see the differences between the default config and the ports current config? -- Humans are always slightly lost. It's a basic characteristic. It explains a lot about them.

missing dependency

pkg: dovecot has a missing dependency: mariadb100-client pkg: postfix-current has a missing dependency: mariadb100-client pkg: net-snmp has a missing dependency: mariadb100-client pkg: rsyslog has a missing dependency: mariadb100-client pkg: p5-DBD-mysql has a missing dependency: mariadb100-client

Re: Updating Postfix

On 21 Mar 2019, at 06:25, Carmel NY wrote: > I am just inquiring to find out if there is any specific reason for > these ports not being updated. In the past, the releases and the > FreeBSD ports system were kept virtually in sync. There was some talk when 3.4.0 came out about withdrawing it,

Re: replacement for xmms?

On 17 Jan 2019, at 05:53, Robert Huff wrote: > Samy Mahmoudi writes: >> Why do you need a replacement for xmms ? > Because it's no longer in the ports tree? /usr/ports/audio/xmms2 /usr/ports/audio/gxmms2 Is there an issue with xmms2? -- I loved you when our love was blessed I love you now

Port Spamass-rules?

When updating Spam Assassin today I noticed that the notes at the end of the port install still recommend installing mail/spamass-rules. This should not be done, right? -- Get in there you big furry oaf! I don't care what you smell! ___

  1   2   >