Re: pkg install fails in some strange way on 14.0

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > > So even if I have newer pkg's in the repo, pkg upgrade does > > > > not find them. Any ideas what's going on ? > > > > > > pkg calls with -d option (debug) can be found at: > > > > > >

Re: pkg install fails in some strange way on 14.0

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > So even if I have newer pkg's in the repo, pkg upgrade does > > not find them. Any ideas what's going on ? > > pkg calls with -d option (debug) can be found at: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/pkg-bug.txt >

Re: Official package for `gitup` on CURRENT doesn't work

15 avr. 2021 17:44:40 Lev Serebryakov : > >   I'm not sure, is it for ports@ or current@? > >   I've installed latest CURRENT snapshot (20210408-15dc713ceb5-24588), > bootstrapped `pkg` and installed `gitup`. > >   `gitup` can not be run due to `Undefined symbol "ucl_object_iterate"`... >

Re: @sample surprises (dns/knot-resolver)

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:34:11AM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > As prep-work for CMake updates I locally "exp-run" all the ports that use > CMake. I use poudriere for this, with the `-t` flag to test each port. > > dns/knot-resolver fails to package like that, with this error: > >

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 07:26:42AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:53 AM Robert Huff wrote: > > > > > The transition has happened. > > Where do I find the authoritative guide for non-committers? > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > >

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:02:29PM +0100, Olivier Certner wrote: > Hi, > > Maintainer of Tauthon here, and of Pale Moon (for the few hours it lived in > the tree in February; but I'm still pushing updates to PR 251117). > > I find this announcement very much disappointing, because the situation

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:45:09PM +, Bob Eager wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:03:47 + > Rene Ladan wrote: > > > - - mail/mailman is being replaced by clusteradm@ with mlmmj. You > > can use `pkg lock` to stick with it after removal, if there is no > > other way. > > Is anyone working

Re: Git repository timeline?

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:29:27AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > Is there any indication when ports will be available via git? > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > There will be an announcement soon, but you can expect it to happen in a couple of weeks. Best regards, Bapt signature.asc

Re: broken vuln.xml?

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 08:16:30AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:01:14PM +, Bob Eager wrote: > > > > > > This appears to have broken (Sunday?) on one of my systems. > > > &

Re: broken vuln.xml?

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:01:14PM +, Bob Eager wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 07:56:16 -0500 > Robert Huff wrote: > > > Hello: > > This appears to have broken (Sunday?) on one of my systems. > > What is the correct way to download/regenerate this file? > > portaudit is being replaced

Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 25/01/2021 15:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:23:45PM +0100, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports > > wrote: > > > On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > > >

Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:23:45PM +0100, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: > On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > Greetings, > > I am completely ignorant here and am looking for up to > > date advice on how to get poudriere to build and make > > available package sets from multiple

[FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] portaudit db EOLed

Hello everyone, In 2014, portaudit has been decommision and removed from the ports tree in favor of pkg audit. portaudit was using a csv database (namely auditfile.tbz) which was generated from from the vuln.xml database. up to now this db was still built. Since today the file is not updated

Re: Fwd: [package - main-i386-default][sysutils/env4801] Failed for env4801-0.3_1 in build

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:20:36PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Dear ports gurus, > > what am I doing wrong that makes me still receive this message every couple > of days? > > > Von: pkg-fall...@freebsd.org > > Betreff: [package - main-i386-default][sysutils/env4801] Failed for > >

Re: What are the benefits of NO_ARCH?

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > On 11/3/20 11:24 AM, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > > On 11/2/20 3:50 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 03:48:34PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > > > > Am 02.11.20 um 15

Re: What are the benefits of NO_ARCH?

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 03:48:34PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 02.11.20 um 15:33 schrieb Mateusz Piotrowski: > > Hi ports@, > > > > I wonder if setting NO_ARCH=yes brings any significant benefits to how > > our ports collection works. I'd be grateful if you could shed some light > > on the

Re: gvfs-1.46.1

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 06:53:36PM -0400, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote: > Hi > > On FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE I have a problem to install (it built without > problem) gvfs 1.46.1: > > make install > ===> Installing for gvfs-1.46.1 > ===> Checking if gvfs is already installed > ===> Registering

Re: Seeing packaging problems since about 1-2 days (Requesting argument %2 while only 1 arguments are available)

On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 10:28:52AM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > I see recently new package errors like (this also affects ports I maintain): > > ===> Building package for avahi-app-0.7_3 > pkg-static: Requesting argument %2 while only 1 arguments are available > pkg-static:

Re: State changes via pkg's scripts

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 04:32:34PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Is there a more convenient method to examine a package's scripts than > unpacking the manifest file and > # cat +MANIFEST | jq -rM '.scripts' > ? As I'd like to know what changes will, or have been applied. pkg info --raw-format

Re: sysutils/screen-ncurses port

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:35:03AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20200504072624.wlyd73pehq25t...@ivaldir.net>, Baptiste > Daroussin wr > ites: > > > > > > --ma2vde2ykv3k7k6b > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disp

Re: sysutils/screen-ncurses port

On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 01:10:58PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20200430130449.cwsf3x42o6w67...@ivaldir.net>, Baptiste > Daroussin wr > ites: > > > > > > --mvhxgm4zl62unzlf > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disp

Re: sysutils/screen-ncurses port

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:56:54AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20200430075337.3wdzglshhorcd...@ivaldir.net>, Baptiste > Daroussin wr > ites: > > > > > > --vwrr5drfobpkyvop > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disp

Re: sysutils/screen-ncurses port

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:41:46AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > Would people be open to the idea of a sysutils/screen-ncurses port that > depends on devel/ncurses instead of ncureses in base? The reason for this > is there are screen.* terminfo entries in devel/ncurses that don't exist in >

Re: Using pkg in documentation

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 2020-04-26 21:37, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: > > What is the way of mentioning about installing a py-package in > > documentation? Let’s say now the default version of python is 3.7 so in > > most of the cases we can write

Re: current: cd /lib ; ln -s libncurses.so.9 libncurses.so.8 xterm & ffox

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 08:01:35PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2020-04-01 02:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > A libcurses version problem: > > > > Running 13.0-CURRENT with > > /usr/src > > cat .svn_revision 359319 > > cat .ctm_status src-cur 14430 > > /usr/ports > > cat

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 04:38:11PM +, Bob Eager wrote: > People have been saying good things about jitsi (Java based) bu the > port didn't work on a quick try (my ports tree isn't very new though > and there was no time to update it). > The port is about a previous thing from jitsi (a SIP

Re: Unable to run "pkg update -f" on 13-CURRENT

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 04:50:10PM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 2/03/2020 2:47 pm, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > > > I am running FreeBSD 13-CURRENT and I am getting this error on a "pkg > > update": > > > > pkg: wrong architecture: FreeBSD:13.0:amd64 instead of

Re: svn commit: r358166 - head

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:41:15AM +, Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > Are there any way to know which of installed ports are linked to base > > > ncurses? > > > Best Regards. > > > > All the one with USES=ncurses in ports, otherwise I am sorry but no we have > > no > > way

Re: svn commit: r358166 - head

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:22:15PM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > (Switch to freebsd-ports ML) > > From: Baptiste Daroussin > Subject: svn commit: r358166 - head > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:33:14 + (UTC) > > > Author: bapt > > Date: Thu Feb 20 09:33:14 2020 &g

Re: Starting with poudriere

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:55:25AM -0800, George Hartzell wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > > You should really have a look at overlays which are supported in > > poudriere-devel, it will allow you to get rid of portshaker with your use > case: > > &g

Re: Starting with poudriere

On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:18:33AM -0800, George Hartzell wrote: > Dan McGrath writes: > > [...] I am not sure about repo priorities, or how you would deal > > with conflicts with build options that pull in common ports. It is > > something I have been meaning to look into, sorry! Perhaps

Re: Discussion on moving manpages to ${PREFIX}/share/man

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:22:01AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 03:26:04PM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Commit message of ports r484628 says as following. > > > > -

Re: Discussion on moving manpages to ${PREFIX}/share/man

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 03:26:04PM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello, > > Commit message of ports r484628 says as following. > > -- > r484628 | bapt | 2018-11-11 03:12:57 +0900 (Sun, 11 Nov 2018) | 23 lines > > Install

Re: Retiring GNU objdump 2.17.50

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:56:10PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:31:55AM -0500, Ed Maste wrote: > > We currently install and use at most three tools from GNU binutils > > 2.17.50, depending on target architecture: > > > > 1. as - assembler > > 2. ld - linker > >

Re: Portmaster failing

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 02:50:04PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > "Thomas Mueller" writes: > > >> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. There seems to > >> be a pervasive misconception that poudriere is "advanced" and > >> portmaster is simple or straightforward. That notion is

Re: Adding FLAVORS to lua-luarocks

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:43:48PM -0800, Russell Haley wrote: > Hello, > > I have a review for updating the Lua package manager - LuaRocks - it to the > latest revision, 3.2.1. The new port file uses an update to lua.mk from > Andrew Gierth for using FLAVORS to support all available versions of

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:02:23PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-ports wrote: > > Now we can get back on the ipv6 option. > > > > so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or > > without > > ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you

Re: Installing packaged firefox wants to install tesseract

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:10:57PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > I just was wondering what this game has to do with the browser: > > pkg install firefox says: > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > firefox: 69.0.2_1,1 > kf5-kholidays: 5.62.0 > opencv: 3.4.1_24 >

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:40:55PM +0200, Lars Liedtke wrote: > > Am 10.10.19 um 17:17 schrieb LuKreme: > > On Oct 9, 2019, at 00:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> I agree I don't see the reason why we should keep that ipv6 option. When > >> off > >>

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:55PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2019-Oct-09 16:30:48 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or > >without > >ipv6 for the ports side. > > Last time I checked, XDMCP

[HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:14:13PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > > Yasuhiro KIMURA writes: > > > > > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > > > default. Commit message

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > Yasuhiro KIMURA writes: > > > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > > default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate > > IPV6 options by default everywhere". > > > > And now we are in 2019.

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:16:08PM +0300, abi via freebsd-ports wrote: > 07.10.2019 09:18, Yasuhiro KIMURA пишет: > > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > > default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate > > IPV6 options by default everywhere". > > >

Re: [HEADSUP] Removing DESTDIR support (aka chroot not staging)

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:02:09AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > You may want to contact "jhb": head/base/README says: > Well head/base has been written by me and the DESTDIR in there has nothing to do with the feature called DESTDIR in the ports tree ;) Best regards, Bapt signature.asc

Re: [HEADSUP] Removing DESTDIR support (aka chroot not staging)

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:01:39PM +0400, Antranig Vartanian wrote: > we never had any issues, the system was automated by the old sysdamin, > currently running FreeBSD 11.2, although I’m migrating to my way (make on NFS > server, make install on clients), so I wont need DESTDIR. > > for the

Re: [HEADSUP] Removing DESTDIR support (aka chroot not staging)

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:55:12PM +0400, Antranig Vartanian wrote: > Hi there! > > I use DESTDIR at $work. our simple use case is the following: mount NFS to > server0 (which is more powerful), use DESTDIR to install into the NFS mounted > location, then other can use and merge those binaries.

[HEADSUP] Removing DESTDIR support (aka chroot not staging)

Hello, As far as I know, the chroot support in the ports tree, is not used by anyone (and is broken in many areas) this is the feature called DESTDIR. If anyone is using it, can you please raise your voice, in order to understand your use case and see if we should juste remove the support for

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:29:06PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2 > underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent > that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly >

Re: pkg check failures

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:41:00AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > context: poudriere-devel, 12-stable > > Some packages fail pkg check with the following errors: > > root@desktop:/root# pkg check -d caja > Checking caja: 100% > root@desktop:/root# pkg check -s caja > Checking caja: 0% >

Re: Reinstalling with dependencies

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:11:05PM +0100, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 22/05/2019 12:51, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:43:33PM +0100, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > Is there any way to reinstall a package with all its dependencies? > > &

Re: Reinstalling with dependencies

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:43:33PM +0100, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Is there any way to reinstall a package with all its dependencies? > > > I am getting the following error: > > root@someserv:~ # pkg check -d > Checking all packages: 100% > elinks is missing a required shared library: libjs.so >

Re: How to use @preexec to test for installed packages

On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 03:58:48PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > as pkg cannot handle CONFLICTS_INSTALL I tried now to implement this as > a preinstall command using @preexec in pkg-plist. > > The command should check if a package is installed and stop the > installation or

Re: category for VPN softwares?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:47:30PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:34:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:29:09AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:24 AM Diane Bruce wrote: > > > >

Re: category for VPN softwares?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:29:09AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:24 AM Diane Bruce wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:13:58AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:37 AM Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On

Re: www/webkit-gtk2 deprecation?

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:33:11AM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Jonathan Chen (j...@chen.org.nz): > > > I notice that www/webkit-gtk2 has just been marked as FORBIDDEN and > > DEPRECATED. While I'm usually for putting down unmaintained ports, > > this particular port is a

Re: Any user of esound daemon?

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:39:25AM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org): > > > Are there any esound users left that can raise a voice to explain why and > > how > > they are using esound? In my latest playing directly with

Any user of esound daemon?

Hello everyone, esound daemon is a very long time abandonware, it is not used anymore by most modern desktops applications. I think it is time to start deprecating it and removing the infrastructure parts (in ports) that supports it. Are there any esound users left that can raise a voice to

Re: vim - GTK2 or GTK3?

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:42:29AM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 02/01/19 16:20, Niclas Zeising wrote: > > On 2019-01-02 10:42, Lars Engels wrote: > [...] > > +1, GTK3 is probably the best choice. > > > > As a side note, it looks like libreoffice defaults to GTK2 as well, > > perhaps it should

Re: how to do pkg_info -W without pkg_info?

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 07:29:37PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Sunday, September 30, 2018 a las 11:09:20AM -0600, @lbutlr escribió: > > > I would like to find out what port installed a specific file, and in > > searching I found the suggestion, from 2010, to use > > > > pkg_info -W >

Re: Port collection (incorrectly) marked as not supporting 11.1

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:22:24AM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > On: > > FreeBSD lilith 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE #0 r321664: Fri Jul 28 > 23:35:18 EDT 2017 root@lilith:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > Attempting to run make on any port produces: > > /!\ ERROR: /!\ > >

Re: how to enforce one version of python

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 03:28:15PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > There are a number of ports that seem to have their own preferential flavour > of python, and some for example want to install python27 and python36 in the > same place, and it's a pain when using portupgrade or similar tools.

Re: dialog4ports-0.1.6 screwed up ?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:45:47PM +0200, Axel Rau wrote: > Thanks Bapt, > > but… > > > Am 27.08.2018 um 13:30 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin : > > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:25:20PM +0200, Axel Rau wrote: > > >> [build3:devel/librelp] root# printen

Re: dialog4ports-0.1.6 screwed up ?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:25:20PM +0200, Axel Rau wrote: > Hi all, > > make config does not work with various ports. > dialog4ports says: Skipping ‚config‘ as NO_DIALOG is defined Somewhere you defined "NO_DIALOG" meaning dialog4ports is not executed. Either remove it or cleanup the old

Re: Removing git dependencies on perl5 and python27

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 15. Jun 2018, at 10:10 AM, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:57 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >> Last time I checked, building git without Perl broke submodules (which is > >> a core feature that

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:00:02AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:03:47 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" > said > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:27 AM Bob Eager wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:08:17 +0100 > > > Johannes Lundberg

Re: zsh 5.5: core dump during serial login

Le 17 avril 2018 00:20:43 GMT+02:00, "Dr. Peter Voigt" <pvo...@uos.de> a écrit : >On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:56:45 +0200 >Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:33:08AM +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: >> > Today I up

Re: zsh 5.5: core dump during serial login

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:33:08AM +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > Today I upgraded shells/zsh to version 5.5 on my FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p9 > machine. > > During a login over serial line (wired or IPMI-SOL) I am immediately > kicked out after a successful login. Syslogd shows: > > xxx kernel:

Re: `pkg version -PvL=` shows some ports as "orphaned"

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:50:35PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 13.03.2018 21:39, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > > maybe, cause of this > > > > pkg install devel/pecl-intl > Then "orphaned" status is misleading. "Renamed"? There is no such thing as renamed yet in pkg. so there is no way

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 07:31:00PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:27:22AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > > From: Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> > > Subject: Re: daily security run output and joomla3 > > Date: Sun,

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:27:22AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: Larry Rosenman > Subject: Re: daily security run output and joomla3 > Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 12:04:56 -0600 > > > But as the OP notes, the joomla3 instructions *REQUIRE* > > removal of the install directory

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:04:56PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:56:51AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > > From: Carmel NY > > Subject: Re: daily security run output and joomla3 > > Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:38:10 + > > > > >>You can try

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:20:20AM +, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > I want to suggest that we enable wayland by default. In current state > having some parts of wayland in ports is basically useless the > end-users themselves re-build gtk30 and mesa-libs with wayland > enabled. > >

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:54:27 > +0100): > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:49:45PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > Alternatively, h

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:49:45PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Stefan Esser (from Tue, 5 Dec 2017 08:35:55 +0100): > > > Am 05.12.17 um 00:43 schrieb Tatsuki Makino: > > > By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor? > > > I am using portmaster. >

Re: gnu ltdl and FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:58:32AM +, blubee blubeeme wrote: > I've tried passing CONFIGURE_ARGS or removing it, both gives the same error > below. > LIB_DEPENDS= libltdl.so:devel/libltdl > GNU_CONFIGURE= yes > CONFIGURE_ARGS= --enable-ltdl-install > USES=autoreconf gmake

Re: gnu ltdl and FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:25:57AM +, blubee blubeeme wrote: > This is what the Makefile looks like, the file still fails: > > LICENSE= GPLv3+ > BUILD_DEPENDS= gsed:textproc/gsed > > BINARY_ALIAS=sed=gsed > > LIB_DEPENDS= libltdl.so:devel/libltdl > GNU_CONFIGURE= yes >

Re: gnu ltdl and FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:37:57AM +, blubee blubeeme wrote: > I'm trying to port some software that keeps failing when it tries to find a > config.h. > > I know the config.h file is there but I think the compilation is failing > because it's trying to build ltdl and freebsd doesn't need that

Re: Why ports are allowed to be linked with base OpenSSL?

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:15:24PM +, Yuri wrote: > Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed here > before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with > SSL_DEFAULT=base, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=openssl, this will obviously > cause conflicts when

Re: Getting off topic (Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc)

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:28:59PM +, George Mitchell wrote: > On 10/06/17 04:20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:13:42AM +, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On Wed, Oc

Re: [RFC] less patches: control the PATH

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:11:46PM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a patch to add a new feature I am willing to get for a while: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12603 > > What this patch does it basically prepend to PATH a new directory (inside > WR

[RFC] less patches: control the PATH

Hi all, Here is a patch to add a new feature I am willing to get for a while: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12603 What this patch does it basically prepend to PATH a new directory (inside WRKDIR) A user can control which binary will be found in the PATH of the build sequences easily by adding

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:08:54PM +, Baho Utot wrote: > > > On 10/05/17 16:27, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > > On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > > > > > > Here's my take on that. > > > > > > > > The future direction has

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:13:42AM +, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:15:18PM +, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > >

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:15:18PM +, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > > > Poudriere really needs its own small book. Yes, you can do simple > > poudriere installs, but once you start covering it properly the docs > > quickly expand.

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:07:51AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Ok I know about HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS, it's a good approach. But how to deal > with when I need to restart a service without upgrading? Reaper > functionnality is a trouble for many administrators who made meta ports to > manage their

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:01:30PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi Cassiano, > > > On 30. Aug 2017, at 2:55 PM, Cassiano Peixoto > > wrote: > > > > Why it used to work on FreeBSD 10? It stopped worked on FreeBSD 11 only. > > It was a later 10.x change as far as I

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:55:22AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > Why it used to work on FreeBSD 10? It stopped worked on FreeBSD 11 only. It only worked on FreeBSD 10 prior to 10.2, the reaper functionnality in freebsd kernel appeared in 10.2 > > Cron is just an example, I

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:00:55AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Sorry back to this subject. But I really need to restart services with a > port. I'm quite sure there is a bug with pkg and FreeBSD 11. > > I made a simple port to restart cron service: It is not a bug, it is by

Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:38:28PM +0200, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hello, > > I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / improve > the FreeBSD support in libfuse. My goal is for libfuse not to require > any FreeBSD specific patches. > > After taking a look at >

Re: Monday Pick (fwd)

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 08:09:31AM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: > When is the cocksucker who runs this this list going to implement some > simple anti-spam provisions? Or are you one of those idiotic "frea speach" > spam supporters, so prevalent amongst Americans these days? > We do not tolerate

Re: Should a package restart on upgrade itself

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > it is always a pain if pkg upgrade a lot of packages to restart all > services to make sure update/security fixes are applied to all running > services. > > Is there an option in pkg that it restart services

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:03:33AM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > [Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:18:56 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin > <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > >As usual with such proposal, where do you find the manpower to handle the > >number > >of

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:18:56PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:15:02PM +0200, David Demelier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Today I've upgraded one of my personal FreeBSD servers. It's running > > FreeBSD 11.0 for a while. > > > &g

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:15:02PM +0200, David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > Today I've upgraded one of my personal FreeBSD servers. It's running > FreeBSD 11.0 for a while. > > While I use quarterly ports branches, I usually update my ports tree > before installing a new service and I faced

Re: Several PostgreSQL versions installed

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:59:08PM +0200, José García Juanino wrote: > Hi FreeBSD porters, > > > I have been read the following thread > > "Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare" > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-July/099842.html > > but I think

Re: diff and submissions

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:27:13PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 05/05/2017 à 12:20, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 05/05/2017 à 08:16, Franco Fichtner a écrit : > >>>> On 4. May 201

Re: diff and submissions

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 05/05/2017 à 08:16, Franco Fichtner a écrit : > >> On 4. May 2017, at 10:20 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >> If you went as far as being able to create a pull request, you can do a > >> git show HEAD or git

Re: pkg and packages

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:09:47AM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman > wrote: > > >>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's > >>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software:

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:18:53AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 21/04/2017 à 00:16, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:13:52AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 20/04/2017 à 23:21, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > >>> On Thu, Apr 20,

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:13:52AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 20/04/2017 à 23:21, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote: > >> On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 00:56 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> Hi all, >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >