Re: Large builds with poudriere

driere/issues/319 > >-- >Alexis Praga Have you tried "devel/ccache"? I have it incorporated into poudriere and it makes quite a difference. The first time you build a large package, it won't make any difference; however, on subsequent builds, it cut the build time significantly on my s

Re: Ports INDEX

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:48:25 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> I just switched from using 'portsnap' to 'git'. I removed everything >> in the directory, then used 'git' to build it. That worked fine. I >> had to manually recreate the 'distfiles' directory, but I expected >> to have to do that.

Ports INDEX

I just switched from using 'portsnap' to 'git'. I removed everything in the directory, then used 'git' to build it. That worked fine. I had to manually recreate the 'distfiles' directory, but I expected to have to do that. Now, if I run a 'make search' in the directory, I receive an error message

poudriere and removing ports tree & mount points

MOUNTPOINT zroot/poudriere/ports/local zroot/poudriere/ports/local Shouldn't poudriere have removed the mountpoint? I used "zfs destroy" to remove it. -- Carmel pgpQOpWGUUN17.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Updating poudriere to use gitup

With the change in the FreeBSD ports system, I have started to use "gitup". I have this working fine. Unfortunately, I cannot figure out how to get poudriere, version 3.3.99.20210303_1 to use 'gitup' too. It insists on using 'portsnap'. This is on a FreeBSD 11.4-p9 system. Is there a 'How-to"

Re: gitip usage.

On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 19:49:04 +0200 (CEST), Helge Oldach stated: >Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote on Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:46:15 >+0200 (CEST): >> running 12.2 STABLE, I would like a complete DEFAULTS and PORTS >> example for gitup.conf. > > "defaults" : { > "host"

Re: poudriere and gitup

On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:18:27 +, Rene Ladan stated: >On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:43:49AM -0400, Carmel wrote: >> I am using "poudriere-devel", version 3.3.99.20210303_1 on a FreeBSD >> 11.4-RELEASE-p8 amd64 machine. I was told that poudriere uses >> 'portsnap' by

poudriere and gitup

I am using "poudriere-devel", version 3.3.99.20210303_1 on a FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE-p8 amd64 machine. I was told that poudriere uses 'portsnap' by default. What, do I have to do if I want it to defer to "gitup" {devel/py-git-up} instead? -- Carmel pgpagGmZ3Dx1s.pgp Descript

Re: Fresh Ports: citrix_ica Citrix(R) Presentation Server(TM) client

SD would work and that they would not be offering me any technical support with a long ago depreciated version. I realize that 'citrix' apparently does not have a maintainer, and since I cannot maintain it, it would be nice if someone with the required technical knowledge could update it to the latest version. -- Carmel pgp9sNj0Pl81p.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Sudden trouble with net/rdesktop

ou intend to achieve by now keeping the Windows machine up-to-date? That sounds like a risky venture. -- Carmel pgpQf6wYMThE7.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: www/joomla3 is no longer in the FreeBSD pkg repo

Joomla in awhile. I found it easer to install and maintain by simply using the source rather than the FreeBSD ports version. Have you tried updating it via its build in update feature? -- Carmel pgpwNMTn14Zyt.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[phpLDAPadmin] Fatal error: Uncaught Exception: Serialization of 'Closure'

oks/phpLDAPadmin/issues/103> I was wondering if the port maintainer was aware of this and hopefully plans to update the port accordingly. Thanks! -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Availability of samba 4.12.x

riously doubt that you have the definitive answer, but thanks for playing. -- Carmel pgpSD3bO1iGzd.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Availability of samba 4.12.x

I was just wondering why the current stable version of samba -- samba 4.12.7 is not available in the post tree? -- Carmel pgpiWwsjtZK9p.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:44:27 -0700, John Kennedy stated: >On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote: >> On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >> >> See >> >> https://www.fre

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: >> Is 'portsnap' >> going to be depreciated? > >Yes. > >> If so, when? > >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent >-

portsnap depreciation

Perhaps I am wrong on this, so I thought I would ask. Is 'portsnap' going to be depreciated? If so, when? If is is depreciated, how will this affect poudriere? I thought that poudriere used 'portsnap'. -- Carmel pgpu4e_OrLlmR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Error: MOVED: net/kblog EXPIRED 2020-08-13 No longer shipped

On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:12:41 +0200, Michael Gmelin stated: >> On 16. Aug 2020, at 02:16, Carmel wrote: >> >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 01:22:35 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder >> stated: >>> ## Carmel (carmel...@outlook.com): >>> >>>>

Re: Error: MOVED: net/kblog EXPIRED 2020-08-13 No longer shipped

On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 01:22:35 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder stated: >## Carmel (carmel...@outlook.com): > >> [00:00:01] Error: MOVED: net/kblog EXPIRED 2020-08-13 No longer >> shipped [00:00:01] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial >> ports metadata > >

Error: MOVED: net/kblog EXPIRED 2020-08-13 No longer shipped

When I attempted to do a bulk build with poudriere today, I was greeted with this rather disturbing message. ~ # poudriere bulk -f ./port-list.txt -j 114Ramd64 [00:00:00] Creating the reference jail... done [00:00:00] Mounting system devices for 114Ramd64-default [00:00:00] Mounting

Re: Segmentation fault happens after updating mail/postfix to 3.5.5

On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:59:25 +0900 (JST), Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: >Hello All, > >After updating mail/postfix to 3.5.5 following warning message appears >in /var/log/maillog. > >Jul 26 11:47:34 eastasia postfix/smtpd[93696]: connect from >maybe.home.utahime.org[192.168.174.201] Jul 26 11:47:34

Re: net/qt5-network

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:44:21 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder stated: >## Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com): > >> The entire build log, what there is of it, is available here: >> https://seibercom.net/logs/qt5-network_build.log > >And there's your problem: >:

Re: net/qt5-network

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:30:52 +0400, Gleb Popov stated: >On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:28 PM Carmel NY wrote: > >> >On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:10, Carmel NY >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE >> >> >> >> With a fre

Re: net/qt5-network

>On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:10, Carmel NY wrote: >> >> FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE >> >> With a freshly updated ports tree, when I attempt to run poudriere to >> update the installed ports, I am greeted with this warning: >> >> [00:00:21] Ignoring ne

net/qt5-network

I cannot install version 12 or 13 of FreeBSD because of an squashed bug, "https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237666; I have I correct this problem? Thanks -- Carmel pgpMTIUEK9hyF.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Updating py27-* ports

On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:23:09 -0600, @lbutlr stated: >On 04 Jul 2020, at 08:30, Carmel wrote: >> I see that you are putting it all on one line. That is probably >> easier. I like the separate entries technique simply because I find >> it easier to read myself or quickly comment

Re: Updating py27-* ports

ies technique simply because I find it easier to read myself or quickly comment out an entry. What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen 'default_versions" both with and without it. Thanks! -- Carmel pgpAqUzgXWw1M.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Updating py27-* ports

ython2=3.7 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python3=3.7 and then rebuild all of my ports. Would that be sufficient, or even correct? Thanks! -- Carmel pgpF26xWJ1z3w.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245939

Would it be possible for some committer to look at the following PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245939 It has been hanging around for over a month. Until it is committed, any serious work on updating and reorganizing 'claws-mail' is effectively halted. Thanks! -- Carmel

Mailman 3

I was just wondering if there is a specific reason that Mailman 3 is not in the ports system. The latest update, Mailman 3.3.1 (Tom Sawyer) was released on April 19, 2020. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

t;package and find out if it really helps. So, did it work? From experience, I always have to restart Dovecot after an update. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To un

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:36:46 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote: >> On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in >>>

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

(0x801c0) > >Which the crypto stuff from BASE > >But I have available >root@mailserver:/ # ls /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.11 >/usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.11 > >What am I missing here? How are you attempting to build the port? -- Carmel pgpDOO3OhDop1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

f "%s\n\n" "$(date)" # See if we got a new file if [[ "${NEW}" -gt "${OLD}" ]]; then printf "New /usr/local/share/smartmontools/drivedb.h file downloaded.\n" else printf "/usr/local/share/smartmontools/drivedb.h not updated.\n" fi # Get back to where we started cd ${cwd} # We are out of here exit -- Carmel pgpQ_FfkMCaRX.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:52:04 +0100, Bob Eager stated: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400 >Carmel NY wrote: > >> FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 >> >> Output of smartctl -V >> >> smartctl 7.1 2019-12

smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

commended procedure on FreeBSD to update this file? -- Carmel pgp5UCOttUH9h.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

it. I don't know why you are apparently having audio & video problems. Perhaps it is localized to your equipment. -- Carmel pgp5jOx009YR7.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Build with "DEBUG" symbols

Hypothetically, suppose I wanted to build my entire ports system with "debug" symbols; would putting: WITH_DEBUG_PORTS=* in the "make.conf" file work? Asking for a friend. -- Carmel pgp8Qwk11g7Dn.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800, Russell Haley stated: >On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY >wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >> >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >> >wrote: >> >> &

Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

ensed code in >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > ># Adam I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing -- Carmel pgps00Abzng2P.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

"devel/kio-extras" with samba v4-10

s EOL'd? If the port cannot be made to work with a modern version of samba; then the option should either be removed or turned off as the default in the makefile, preferable with a notation of why. -- Carmel pgpGifnNpFpXR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

"math/openblas" will not build under poudriere

Attempting to build "math/openblas" using poudriere results in this error message: Ignoring: has to be built manually: Optimizes for the build machine. I can build it manually, however. Is this a bug or a design feature? The complete log of the failed poudriere build follows. build started at

Updating Samba

The latest stable release of Samba is "4.11.2". The newest port version is "4.10.10". Are there plans to update Samba to the latest stable release or is there a specific reason that it cannot be done at this time? -- Carmel _

Web Service Discovery host daemon

I am considering installing "wsdd" <https://github.com/christgau/wsdd>. I have not been able to find a port for it. I just want to confirm that there isn't a port available for this program before I go about installing it from source. Tha

Re: Status of samba ports

t maintainer, ti...@freebsd.org, regarding when he plans to release it to the port system. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PHP version retirement

ample time to render his/her system ready for that inevitability. It they have not accomplished that with the set time frame, they probably were never serious about doing it. Just my 2¢. -- Carmel pgpGaPp09iXyS.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Possible Patch

Is it possible for some committer to look at this. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=205971=edit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Switching to openssl111

FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p6 GENERIC amd64 openssl version: OpenSSL 1.0.2s 28 May 2019 I want to use openssl111 so I can take advantage of 'tls 1.3' with postfix and apache24. I am trying to determine the correct procedure to use. I am using poudriere to build my packages and then install them. 1)

Updating Samba

The 20190619 entry in "UPDATING" recommends certain actions for updating Samba4[6-8] utilizing either 'portmaster' or 'portupgrade'. Are there4 any special actions that have to be taken if utilizing 'poudriere'? Thanks! -- Carmel NY ___ fre

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

newer software is doing its user base a disservice. At the very least,the OS authors should be able to release a minor version bump to the OS in order to allow it to accommodate the newer software. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Updating Postfix

to find out if there is any specific reason for these ports not being updated. In the past, the releases and the FreeBSD ports system were kept virtually in sync. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

U _Z12qt_memfill16Ptti > U _Z12qt_memfill32Pjji >00017bb0 T _Z12qt_memfill64Pyyi > Just for grins, what is the output of: dmesg | grep -i "CPU" -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

BUG=off: Build with debugging support DTRACE=on: Build with DTrace probes TCLMAN=off: Install Tcl function manpages THREADS=on: Threading support TZDATA=off: Install Tcl timezone data ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings ===> The following configuration options are available for ca_root_nss-3.41: ETCSYMLINK=on: Add symlink to /etc/ssl/cert.pem ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:23:39 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >>> Michael Grimm wrote: > >>>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >&

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

nfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Did you update the poudriere jail to 12.0? I had a similar problem until I undated it and did a forced rebuild of everything. In fact, I found it easier and quicker to simp

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

VE+= MILTER. Thus a libmilter dependency >will be added to users of plain security/clamav port as well. > >Regards, >Michael Clamav-milter updated fine for me once I updated all of the installed ports on my system. I am assuming tha

Building devel/llvm60 on FreeBSD 12.0

-v to see invocation) FreeBSD clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335540) (based on LLVM 6.0.1) Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0 My system: uname -a FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC amd64 Thanks!

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:29:18 +1100, andrew clarke stated: >On Thu 2018-12-13 19:43:30 UTC+0000, Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com) wrote: > >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the po

Updating perl

for py36-certbot-0.29.1_1,1 build of security/py-certbot | py36-certbot-0.29.1_1,1 ended at Fri Dec 14 05:35:15 EST 2018 build time: 00:00:05 !!! build failure encountered !!! Has anyone else had this problem? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:49:07 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Carmel NY wrote: >> >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, >

Updating poudriere jail

I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, if I do update, will I have to rebuild all of my installed applications? Thanks :) -- Carmel

Updating "mysql80-server" port

8.0.13 has been available since 2018-10-22. I was just wondering why, especially if there is a security problem, this port has not been updated? Thanks! -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:47:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:44 AM Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:16AM +, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >> >

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

--without-sodium \ > >by disabling it, dovecot cannot use argon2 as hash for passwords which >is recommended for new deployments and developments. > >Is there a special reason why this was disabled? > >Thanks a lot. I was just going to post a q

dovecot-libsodium-plugin

I notice that there is no port for the "dovecot-libsodium-plugin"; "https://github.com/LuckyFellow/dovecot-libsodium-plugin/;. I was wondering if anyone had an interest in creating one? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mai

Re: orphaned: www/suphp

php72 as well as www/suphp. I had to reinstall php72 and then build build the www/suphp port manually, which also rebuilt the dependencies removed by poudriere. Why is poudriere ignoring the directives in the various make.conf files? -- Carmel ___ freeb

orphaned: www/suphp

I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" which produced this: suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp There is nothing about this in either the UPDATING or MOVED files. Has this port actually been removed and if so, why?

Moving to php-7.2 default

sion to up the default version of PHP in FreeBSD to version 7.2 before 7.1 is EOL'd? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

poudriere and forcing depends

poudriere, poudriere insists on installing MySQL 5.6 and removing MySQL 8.0. I have had a similar problem with PHP72 and poudriere. Either I am doing something incorrectly or else there is a problem with the way poudriere is choosing what dependencies

Re: Of Git and M$

, ssh, ftp or whatever you like. > >this is a problem only for people so lazy that are unable to setup remote >repository. or because "project manager" decided to use github > >of course microsoft bought it to steal software more efficiently. Steal what? It is alre

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:05:21 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/06/04 17:41: >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >> >>> Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >>> https://github.com/Micro

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

t;Miroslav Lachman You might try these URLs and see if it helps: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/visual-studio-code.62542/ https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/debian-ubuntu-fedora-linux-installing-visual-studio-code/ https://visualgdb.com/tutorials/fr

RE: lang/gcc6-aux fails to build

rts/lang/gcc6-aux I filed a PR against this earlier: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228570 -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster

gt;crashes. > >Will both the old and revamped portmaster be maintained, and what will be the >port names, since there can't be two ports both named portmaster? > >I used portupgrade before switching to portmaster. > >Tom -- Carmel

Re: Changing PHP default version from 5.6 to 7.2 timeframe?

la4 are not supposed to be compatible with older versions of php. I have not confirmed that however. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

of instances forked in >practice) and implementing FLAVOR support. Good luck. A 4,000+ line shell script is, IMHO, ridiculous. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700, Steve Kargl stated: >This discussion occurred with the introduction of FLAVORS, >which broken all ports management tools except poudriere. So, you have not tried "synth" and I assume poudri

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

date ports tree before running it. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: phpLDAPadmin -- is it time to drop this from ports?

gt; time being, but if future changes to PHP render it unusable, or if there >> are nasty security bugs discovered and no fixes available, I'm going to >> have to reconsider. > >The Python based tool is probably web2ldap, I will try it out but the >port version lags upstream a bit.

Re: "converters/php72-mbstring" build failure

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:42:41 +1100, Kubilay Kocak stated: >On 19/03/2018 9:33 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> On 19/03/2018 9:22 pm, Carmel NY wrote: >>> FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p8 >>> >>> I am attempting to update the "converters/php72-mbstring" port

"converters/php72-mbstring" build failure

ete build log file is available here: https://www.seibercom.net/converters___php72-mbstring.log I routinely use "synth" to build my ports, if it makes any difference. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.f

Re: Deprecating Skype ports

t or won't work for much longer, and the latest version of skype imported to the ports tree. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

"security/py-certbot-apache" port

ound and is required by the application 2018-02-23 06:43:15,934:ERROR:certbot.log:An unexpected error occurred: __ -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

bexec/apache24/libphp7.so >MD5 (/usr/local/libexec/apache24/libphp7.so) = >0e8d5c7696031e1e59ea8f99ed183973 yasu@eastasia[4001]% ~ $ md5 /usr/local/libexec/apache24/libphp7.so MD5 (/usr/local/libexec/apache24/libphp7.so) = b5d93a95e0c78705a9797bab0e99a292 ~ $ freebsd-version 11.1-RELEASE-p6 -- Carmel

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

-7.2.2 BTW, I use "synth" to keep my system updated. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Error 8192 with phpldapadmin

he port version is several versions behind the current release. I wrote the maintainer and asked him to please update it. In any case, perhaps it is time to mark this port broken or state that it does not work with newer versions of PHP. Just a thought, but it might save someone a lot of wasted ti

Error 8192 with phpldapadmin

correcting this error? Googling did not reveal a positive method. -- Carmel pgp1BkGNtiFSb.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 02:56:51 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: >From: Carmel NY <carmel...@outlook.com> >Subject: Re: daily security run output and joomla3 >Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:38:10 + > >>>You can try "pkg check -r", see man pkg-check >

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:51:16 +0100, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/01/28 11:59: >> FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p6 >> >> I have "www/joomla3" installed and working fine. Part of the configuration >> routine is the removal of the &qu

daily security run output and joomla3

y I can create a new checksum that would not upset the system to radically? Thanks! -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Synth failing

-nox11|net/unison@nox11|2018-01-15|Moved to a flavored, generic, version Apparently, "synth" is not handling it correctly. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubs

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

n that are presently not available or like "wayland" need some massaging. It all depends if I can actually get some free time. Wayland does look promising though, I hate "X". -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https:

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

sy to implement: >I know - but I can remember that procmail should be installed also when >using Postfix. >Might be wrong here... A Postfix / Dovecot with sieve combination is a far more powerful combination and it is fully supported. -- Carmel pgpDMxAMyvSDJ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RE: The ports@ list is now subscriber-post only

before posting; i.e., the postfix forum being an example. Peersonally, I think the FreeBSD team has dragged their feet on this matter way to long to begin with. -- Carmel pgpBhMe9W1i1I.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

IMHO, I think that "postfix" should be the base MTA. It is far easier to configure, it is rock solid and the Postfix forum and documentation are superb. Plus, Dovecot integrates with it seamlessly. -- Carmel pgpleBOSqAB08.pgp Description: PGP signature

Availability of py-certbot-apache

I was wondering if anyone could tell me when the "py-certbot-apache" port might be available? The port's message indicates that it will be available in the "security/py-certbot-apache" port; however, it obviously isn't. -- Carmel pgpC5XCqi8lD9.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sunday, December 3, 2017 3:46 PM, Chris H stated: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" > po...@freebsd.org> said > > On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > > > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: >

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 8:01 AM, Baho Utot stated: > On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning > >> how to use an industrial sized solution line

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > Hi Carmel, > > > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system > > that is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw m

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

again, pkg gives no clues. Synth is failing since this change. I get the feeling that, as usually happens, nobody actually vetted this correctly. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

  1   2   3   >