Quoting Yuri y...@rawbw.com:
I found that many ports specify /usr/bin/perl as an interpreter.
This comes from Linux. Examples: valgrind-snapshot, windowmaker,
enscript-a4, a2ps, svgalib
Just for the record, it does not come from Linux.
Specifying /usr/bin/perl as the interpreter is a Perl
Quoting Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com:
On 07.01.2013 09:54, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Are you willing to step up as the maintainer of the KDE3 ports? Or
anyone else reading this? The situation with ports like KDE3 is that
they are lots of work to keep up in shape and if no one wants to
.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
-digit years becomes a problem!
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports
machine.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, meaning that it isn't usable in *all* circumstances for
*all* advertised purposes.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
it is not
at all clear it need to be removed quickly even if it is not fixed.
(Marking it FORBIDDEN so potential users are warned about known
problems is another thing.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd
deleted.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.)
Nobody is stopping you from assuming maintainership of one or more of
those unmaintained ports, and thus preventing them from being removed.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
be controversial) and thus could block other, far simpler, PRs if they
were taken strictly in order.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
the smaller submission, while skipping
the large one and hoping that some other committer with more free time
will pick up that one.
I see no reason to prefer the first of these choices.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
is just plain silly.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
who is going to do the extra work.
As for fair you haven't convinced me why it should be a requirement.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:12:57AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:48:36 +0200
Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se articulated:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:50:52 -0400
However, I do find troubling you statement regarding
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:39:52AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
On 4/28/2011 12:18 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
And if the committers can't choose what they are going to work on, you
are likely going find yourself with a lot fewer committers fairly soon.
As you notice, I never said
for the best way of doing it which I don't think
that particular solution qualifies as.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
is maintained by:
freebsd-maintai...@opera.com
If it's behind the curve, complain to Opera.
But first check if there is any pending PR with uncommitted patches:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151471
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1
.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
in UPDATING or not, only if some kind of special action is needed.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
was registered on the package that
the depended-on file actually was installed from, but this is currently
not done.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
of them as a build-time dependency. There are *lots* of ports which
have one of them in BUILD_DEPENDS, but few if any that has them as
RUN_DEPENDS.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
*/
#include sys/conf.h
# if FREEBSDV=9000
#undef vm_memattr_t
# endif/* FREEBSDV=9000 */
The 'if FREEBSDV=9000' parts need to be mofified to make it work for older
releases too now that the d_mmap2_t function has been MFC'd.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik
. In -CURRENT non-compatible changes do
happen from time to time, and is often not mentioned in UPDATING, because
people running -CURRENT are not supposed to need such reminders.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
packages and rebuilding about 800+ ports.
Thanks a whole lot.
Nobody is forcing you to rebuild your ports just because the PORTREVISION
was bumped. If everything works fine for you there is actually no good
reason at all to do so.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1
on a headless machine is
the X server itself, which almost no ports depend on anyway (and those which
do are mainly other components of X.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
build. User can then decide
# to skip this port by setting ${BATCH}, or compiling only
# the interactive ports by setting ${INTERACTIVE}.
# Default: not set.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
built
and uploaded. Allowing users to upload packages would not help.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
odd restrictions on usage and distribution)
As for graphics/php5-gd and net-im/kopete ports, they both seem to be available
as pre-built packages so I am not sure what problem you are having with them.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trulsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
there.
Indcidentally when did gcc become part of the base
system?
gcc has always been part of the base system. (Otherwise it would have been
difficult to recompile the base system, or to compile any ports.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
that the presence of ImageMagick is a problem, not when running it.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
, that would be the preferred solution.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
And all this for no reason at all!
What's going on here?
Ldd says it's not necessary. Can anyone really argue with that?
How can ldd determine that it is not necessary?
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
distribution) only.
There is no general mechanism in place for that.
Installing software that is partly or completely closed-source is not really
something that it is considered that users need to be warned about.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
will however not find any version of the ports tree that include Wine
0.9.37 or 0.9.38 because support for those versions were never added to the
ports tree as far as I can tell.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd
and in sysctl.conf
compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16
You are not missing anything. Skype depends on graphics/linux_dri and
graphics/linux_dri currently only works on i386.
I do not know what would be needed to make it work on other architectures as
well.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:34:06PM -0500, Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:58:57 +0100
Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One shortcoming is the lack of locking making parallell builds a bit unsafe.
If you try to build both port A and port B at the same time, and both
it at the time at this list (or possibly one of the other freebsd- lists.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
builds safe, should be possible to
add to the ports system without doing any sweeping changes.
(I did look briefly at the makefiles, but did not find any obvious place
to put the locking. I probably just did not look hard enough.)
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL
Makefile* | grep -i aintainer
instead. Then you will also find MAINTAINER, which I believe is how
it is normally spelled.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
the length freezes be diminished on future occasions?
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 11:49:11AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly inconvienced
by any of the ports tree freezes.
All I can say is bully for you! The question is how do
are in misc/. One counter-example is emulators/kqemu-kmod,
another is x11/nvidia-driver.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
list
that info directly in the Makefile.
I don't think there is any way of doing what you want without searching
through every single Makefile/pkg-plist file in the entire ports tree.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the rc script can be improved?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
for.
No, not really. The suffix is mainly just a revision number for the code
base. The (major) version number for the protocol is the '11' part, which
has not been changed for nearly 20 years now.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
49 matches
Mail list logo
