Re: why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
On 7/10/2011 6:32 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: Hey, why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? Hello, See ports/155297. (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155297) Regards, Frank Laszlo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: one question please

2010-11-06 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
On 11/6/2010 4:31 PM, Marián Jamrich wrote: Hi! I have one question to you. How do I get email address my_n...@freebsd.org? I made my first FreeBSD port and I want to send to commit. Thanks for you reply. Hello! @FreeBSD.org addresses are reserved for committers and other FreeBSD

Re: new port - different versions of the same file - advice needed

2010-11-05 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: What I've done for now is to create a tgz of the 3 *.f files above, and put it at http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/blasmach.tgz I then put in the Makefile MASTER_SITES= http://netlib.org/slatec/ \ http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/ DISTNAME=

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-22 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Joe wrote: The text as its currently exists is a long way from being clear to a first timer. And I am talking about the new change that just went in. shar `find port_dir` (note the backticks), or shar $(find port_dir) both address the problem nicely. By all means go and make the

Re: vim ports broken.

2009-06-25 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Johan van Selst wrote: Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: Choosing % to differentiate it, however, was a bad idea. It would be better to use a simple underscore. Why is % any worse than an underscore? As I explained earlier, fetch has no problem dealing with it. The errors people were

Re: cannot do pkg_add -f package

2009-06-25 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Boris Samorodov wrote: Hello List, I downloaded a package from pointyhat: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-packages-latest/databases/fpc-postgres-2.2.4.tbz And can not do a pkg_add -f of this package: - # uname -a FreeBSD moosi 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 22

Re: vim ports broken.

2009-06-24 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santosunixma...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Philip M. Golluccipgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote: Helmut Schneider wrote: matt donovan kitchet...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri,

Re: vim ports broken.

2009-06-23 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Helmut Schneider wrote: Philip M. Gollucci pgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote: Helmut Schneider wrote: matt donovan kitchet...@gmail.com wrote: The port *is* broken: # fetch ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/obrien/7.2.041 fetch:

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Florent Thoumie wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever option to tell ports that you just do not want an x

Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit

2009-05-20 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Vladimir Ermakov wrote: Hi, all. please appreciate my port *megacli* http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 Is that different from this the port, is it an update? Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli Since the megacli application now

Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit

2009-05-20 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Sean McAfee wrote: IMO, linux-megacli, linux-megacli2, and megacli should all exist as independent ports. Do they provide different functionality or are we just keeping them around for nostalgic purposes? Regards, Frank Laszlo

Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit

2009-05-20 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Sean McAfee wrote: Frank J. Laszlo wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Vladimir Ermakov wrote: Hi, all. please appreciate my port *megacli* http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 Is that different from this the port, is it an update? Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux

Re: Suggested improvements for ports

2008-01-13 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Doug Barton wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: 1) You can't build a dependent port and first set the config for the options that you want. So, when you select sasl in postfix, you never get the chance to check the saslauthd option, for example. As the ports man page states:

Re: determining what ports directly depend on X

2008-01-03 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Aryeh Friedman wrote: I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now (but this will need to be more general later) is attempting to find all the direct childern of libtool15 A quick hack would be grep

Re: determining what ports directly depend on X

2008-01-03 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now (but this will need to be more general later

Re: Limitations of Ports System

2007-12-15 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Your correct that there are 2 seperate issues at play here but there is a common solution (and to be honest I have yet to see any feature/issue discussed in any of the re-engineering threads that doesn't at least become more manageable under this general design concept I

Re: Limitations of Ports System

2007-12-15 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
David Southwell wrote: And get this I have been around the computer world using *nix long before freebsd came along. That does not mean what I say today deserves to be judged other than on its face value. However what over 40 years in IT has encouraged me to think that those who invite

Re: [CFR] ftp/curl update and API incompatibility

2006-12-06 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Pentchev wrote: Hi, I'm writing to you all because you are listed as maintainers of ports that depend directly on ftp/curl. Attached is a patch that updates ftp/curl to version 7.16.0; however, this update might need some testing.

Re: comms/openobex 1.3 fails to build on 6-STABLE

2006-12-06 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Chen wrote: Hi Guido, I'm trying to build openobex 1.3 from the ports on 6.2-PRERELEASE as of Nov 16 2006, and it's failing with the following error: [...] gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory

Re: Who is behind the ports?

2006-12-01 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
PROTECTED] (unmaintained) that could use attention. - -- - - Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iQIVAwUBRXBtb61QwXwBI2DsAQhgiw/+PdTtCPe5s4ZEXFaUG3n2Tz5rKNvnAGKn QFA6LuwSz1L6Xp6/ulbofpUL4/3RViBoOv

Re: GNUCash 2.0 port

2006-11-16 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Doug Poland wrote: On Mon, November 13, 2006 19:20, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: Doug Poland wrote: See ports/93216 and ports/94826. Thank you. Those PR's relate to issues in the 1.9.x version of GnuCash. The post I'm referring to (http

Re: GNUCash 2.0 port

2006-11-15 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Doug Poland wrote: Hello, I was searching the list archives and came across a post by Peter Jeremy. He stated that he has a GNUCash 2.0 port. Does anyone know the status of the port? I couldn't find it querying the PR database. See

Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-4.55.10

2006-11-09 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: I am extremly busy at the moment. It might well take more than a week. Sorry. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jan-Peter Koopmann Dipl.-Wirtschaftsinformatiker Geschäftsführer -- Seceidos GmbHCo. KG | Tel: +49 6151 66843-43 Robert-Bosch-Str. 7|