Hi all,
I am putting a new port together, but the source for the man pages is
not provided in the source tar for the package (and I can't find a
public repo). Instead only the preprocessed version is included.
What is the correct way to install these man pages? Using INSTALL_MAN
to drop
On 2013-05-01 14:00, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/05/2013 14:29, Jake Smith wrote:
I am putting a new port together, but the source for the man pages
is not provided in the source tar for the package (and I can't find a
public repo). Instead only the preprocessed version is included.
Do you
On 2013-05-01 14:09, Jake Smith wrote:
On 2013-05-01 14:00, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/05/2013 14:29, Jake Smith wrote:
I am putting a new port together, but the source for the man pages
is not provided in the source tar for the package (and I can't find a
public repo). Instead only
On 01/05/13 15:23, olli hauer wrote:
On 2013-05-01 15:48, Jake Smith wrote:
On 2013-05-01 14:09, Jake Smith wrote:
On 2013-05-01 14:00, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/05/2013 14:29, Jake Smith wrote:
I am putting a new port together, but the source for the man pages is not provided
Hi,
Recently a service kept crashing on a production box with a SIGSEGV 11.
So I rebuilt with debug symbols to analyse the core file, by adding
WITH_DEBUG=yes into my make.conf (gcc -g).
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
build all my ports with debug
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know when we can expect to see apache24 in the ports tree?
Is a new port currently being worked on or is it waiting for someone to
pick it up?
Jake
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I notice there is a newer version on lang/spidermonkey available,
v1.8.5 (https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SpiderMonkey), the ports
version is currently at v1.7.0. Is the any reasons for this not being
updated yet? If no one has any objections I am willing the write and
submit a patch
Hello,
I notice there is a newer version on lang/spidermonkey available,
v1.8.5 (https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SpiderMonkey), the ports
version is currently at v1.7.0. Is the any reasons for this not being
updated yet? If no one has any objections I am willing the write and
submit a patch
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 14:54 +0800, wen heping wrote:
Hi,
The build failed and below is the error message.
Would you fix it ? Thanks.
wen
Ok this is fixed in the attached patch.
phase 7: make package
=== Building package for
Hello,
I have tried to contact the current maintainer of
security/ossec-hids-server (valerio.dae...@gmail.com) regarding patching
this port due to a newer version being available, but no response.
To help out I created a patch for the port and submitted a PR
(ports/159786) on Aug 15th. This has
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 11:49 +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 25 September 2011 11:29, Jake Smith j...@avenue22.net wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to contact the current maintainer of
security/ossec-hids-server (valerio.dae...@gmail.com) regarding patching
this port due to a newer version being
Hello Marco,
I am just wondering if you (or anyone else) can clarify if I created a
duplicate PR patch for ossec-hids. I notice we both have a PR submitted
to update the freebsd port to 2.5.1 (ports/152169 and ports/152170), and
both have the same arrival date, to the second.
What are the
Hello,
I understand there were a few bugs with ossec v2.5... v2.5.1 has now
been released. Where are we at with maintenance for this port? Would it
be better if I submitted a patch?
Many Thanks
Jake
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 21:47 +0100, Jake Smith wrote:
Hi,
When can we expect security/ossec
Hi,
When can we expect security/ossec-hids-* port to be updated from v2.4.1
to v2.5 released 2010-09-28.
Many thanks!
Regards
Jake
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
14 matches
Mail list logo
