On 2009.08.18 13:00:39 -0700, Luke Dean wrote:
Can you give some examples of window managers that I might be able
to get dockapps to work with if I make this change? I'd like to
try it out.
I migrated to fluxbox, and I use wmCalClock and wmtz which works
nicely with fluxbox.
--
Simon L
On 2008.03.09 15:38:53 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2008.03.09 14:36:49 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
Gerard schreef:
I just saw this 'portsnap' error message for the first time.
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2
is
trying to fetch is out of date either bacause of the mirror being
(partially?) broken or e.g. a broken proxy in between.
Is the working or non-working related to a particular portsnap server?
--
Simon L. Nielsen
Hat: portsnap co-admin
___
freebsd-ports
On 2007.10.14 12:11:38 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2007.10.14 11:27:13 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote:
Hi,
Howyd,
Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any
updates (i.e. the png
the portsnap data is down due to hardware
problems. I'm not sure what the status is, but hopefully it will return
soon.
Onsite people have been poked, but no status yet.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
want to
try and poke the FreeBSD Security Team (secteam@) since we might have
patches to only fix the issue security issue(s). Specifically for
Samba we normally do get patches from the Samba developers for their
security advisories.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Security Team
don't know if I will get to it today.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Security Team
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was running - just ignore it.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
Hat: clusteradm@
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
than mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Security Team
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006.11.12 10:45:21 +, Florent Thoumie wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:05:05PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.11.11 15:48:05 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:37:31PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.11.11 21:12:09 +0200
UID/GID
numbering is a good thing.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't expect things to be fixed until morning PST when someone can
get to the datacenter and look at what went wrong.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
Hat of the day: remote admins
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 2006.10.17 05:42:51 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
Hey,
FYI. Rumor has it that the latest beta driver has this fixed, but I
haven't had time to confirm this yet.
Thanks. I was thinking on whether should I update
disables
FORBIDDEN checks.
But, I agree that DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES is a very poor name - if
only the knob did what the name indicates... :-).
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/security/openscep/files/patch-lib_proxy.c?rev=1.1
for a similar problem in another port.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
apache22 says:
[PRESERVING EXISTING ICONS SUBDIR: /usr/local/www/apache22/icons]
It don't know how to best handle it though without accidently nuking
user icons dirs.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
it will
soon?
I've added it; thanks for the report.
Hmm, i saw the flaw with portaudit -Fda yesterday, however - today
my ruby isn't shown as vulnerable anymore. Why?
The database was broken for a bit due to an invalid entry, try again
now.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
17 matches
Mail list logo