; > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the
>>> > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all FreeBSD supported
>>> > platforms. Obviously this is not acceptable for many cases, but if you
>>> > never cross-compile for othe
-time for devel/llvm* by changing the
> > > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all FreeBSD supported
> > > platforms. Obviously this is not acceptable for many cases, but if you
> > > never cross-compile for other platforms, it's a really big win.
&g
Chris portmaster at bsdforge.com wrote on
Thu May 20 20:09:29 UTC 2021 :
> On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > . . .
> >>
> > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the
> > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all F
Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on
Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 :
> You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the
> config to BE_NATIVE to avoid building backends for all FreeBSD supported
> platforms. Obviously this is not acceptable for many cases, b
KE_JOBS
> # regardless of ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS. This is useful for allowing ports
> # which holdup the rest of the queue to build more quickly.
> #ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES="pkg ccache py*"
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
===
M
of the queue to build more quickly.
#ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES="pkg ccache py*"
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I was doing a poudriere pkgclean under:
# uname -apKU
FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 13.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE #0
releng/13.0-n244733-ea31abc261ff-dirty: Thu Apr 29 21:53:20 PDT 2021
root@CA72_4c8G_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/13_0R-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/13_0R-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72
ensible naming scheme strikes me as helpful.
>>>
>>> It isn't apparent to me that something like poudriere can solve this sort
>>> of problem either. If poudriere attempts to build lxqt in a single jail
>>> it looks like the conflict will emerge within the jail.
quot;
>> remains essential after installatiion. Unless of course it's not really
>> an installer. Even so, a more sensible naming scheme strikes me as helpful.
>>
>> It isn't apparent to me that something like poudriere can solve this sort
>> of problem ei
eme strikes me as helpful.
>
> It isn't apparent to me that something like poudriere can solve this sort
> of problem either. If poudriere attempts to build lxqt in a single jail
> it looks like the conflict will emerge within the jail.
The FreeBSD port building servers use poudr
suggestion for commits-ports-all could go
into the porters manual?
--WjW
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on
Mon May 17 23:46:38 UTC 2021 :
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:28:24PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
> > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on
> > Mon May 17 15:55:21 UTC 2021 :
> >
> > > The exis
s. (I
do assume python versions make for some degree of
incompatibility distinctions. It might be only only
some version changes have that property. But such
would not change the basic point.)
I know, for example, python39 invalidated code in
something I've built in a non-FreeBSD context. The
context for
him to make the go/no-go judgments about poudriere use from
trying it --without having to explore poudriere's many
alternative configuration possibilities first.
> Any jails other than -m null will be cleanly removed by poudriere jail -d, so
> try different ones :)
On 2021-May-16, at 00:16, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/05/16 10:57:
>> In the form that I use poudriere I use something
>> like the following. I presume here that /usr/src
>> is populated and has the source for the system
>> i
o.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
IR=" lines.
>>
>> C) How a builder establishes a ports tree? For reasons of
>> testing patches and such I have a /usr/ports tree of my
>> own (sometimes under another name) and have poudriere use
>> that tree instead of making its own. (And I've never done
&
ns of
testing patches and such I have a /usr/ports tree of my
own (sometimes under another name) and have poudriere use
that tree instead of making its own. (And I've never done
it any other way.)
I use the same /usr/ports for both aarch64 and armv7, so
only the one copy.
You might want a di
ns of python
in use (or other such potential conflicts).
So: It will not be me that tests such commands for handling
such contexts.
May be Bob P. will test your sequence.
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
| cut -d : -f
1 | sort -u)
# portmaster $REBUILD
# REBUILD2=$(pkg list | grep python-37 | xargs pkg which | awk '{print $6}' |
sort -u)
# portmaster $REBUILD2
END QUOTE
Due to how I build/install ports, I've not had to deal
with ending up with the mix so I'm not familiar with
the details for recovering from a messy mix.
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2021-May-12, at 23:13, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On 2021-May-12, at 22:28, bob prohaska wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:16:29PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
>> wrote:
>>> On 2021-May-12, at 20:48, bob prohaska wrote:
>>>
>&g
On 2021-May-12, at 22:28, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:16:29PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>> On 2021-May-12, at 20:48, bob prohaska wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Moving to /usr/ports/json-glib and using
>>> make -D
On 2021-May-12, at 20:48, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:17:37PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>> bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on
>> Wed May 12 21:10:02 UTC 2021 :
>>
>>> Attempts to compile x11/x11-wm/lxqt on a P
-enum-types.c
> FAILED:
> json-glib/libjson-glib-1.0.so.0.600.2.p/meson-generated_.._json-enum-types.c.o
>
> Is there a workaround? Ports were up-to-date as of today, May 12, 2021.
You are not very explicit about the FreeBSD context and
such, beyond RPi4 (so aarm64/aarch64).
It is also l
hrough to
something like:
http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=main-arm64-default
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
(Please CC me, as I am not on -ports)
I would like to know what has happened to mail/postfix-sasl,
particularly with regards to FreeBSD 11.x (warning: I will ignore any
responses about it being EoL).
I clearly see committers tinkering around with things for postfix 3.6,
which supports OpenSSL
ir included in USE_TMPFS shows over 130 GiBytes
in the tmpfs earn the end of the builder's activity.
(This is a amd64 context with 128 GiBytes of RAM and
192 GiBytes of swapping/paging space.)
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
____
lmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, 3 May 2021 12:42:00 +0200
Matthieu Volat wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2021 13:55:45 -0400
> LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE:
> > m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch
On 2021-May-3, at 08:23, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 01:00:03AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
> [detailed code tour omitted]
>
>>
>> My guess would be xoscope used a signed 32-bit type
>> that got a value with sign extension
extension to 64 bits
before the value started being treated as unsigned.
If it had used an unsigned type instead, the padding
would have been a zero fill instead (presuming that
I've guessed right).
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
_
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not
sure about the universe.”
― Albert Einstein
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send a
Hi!
I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE:
m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch at 1st parameter ('uint64_t'
(aka 'unsigned long') vs 'GInt64' (aka 'long long')) virtual void
seekp (uint64_t pos) = 0; ^
exrdataset.cpp:495
On 01/05/21 01:17, Dutchman01 via freebsd-emulation wrote:
bugfix release 6.1.22 is released!
There is need to upgrade from 6.1.20 to 6.1.22
This is known, automatic notifications already reached the mailing list
yesterday at 8:55 UTC
The notification actually contained an error and I
bugfix release 6.1.22 is released!
There is need to upgrade from 6.1.20 to 6.1.22
Regards,
Dutchman
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
s the xcbgen package (from xcb-proto) to its working
directory, because we need it for python 2.7. The copy assumes the default
python version as source, which is 3.8 as of now - probably the xcb package is
still installed for 3.7 though (see line 268 in the Makefile).
Rebuilding/installing xcb-
On 2021-Apr-28, at 22:26, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>>> https://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/09/freebsd-subversion-to-git-migration.html
>>
>> The https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/ material
>> for git-why.md is still available via:
>>
>> https://
Kurt Jaeger pi at freebsd.org wrote on
Wed Apr 28 19:30:32 UTC 2021 :
> > > > The 'why' was explained here:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/
>
> Ah, here's the link to the 'why' post:
>
> htt
t;
>
> 2021年4月27日(火) 17:18 LuMiWa via freebsd-ports
> :
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have a problem to update Python on FreeBSD 13.0 RELEASE follow
> > the rules for portmaster in /usr/ports/UPDATING. It stopped wit
> > py-gobject3:
> >
> > self
and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Welcome weeds into the garden, and soon that's all which will grow. -unknown
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To un
Am 2021-04-27 12:10, schrieb Rodrigo Osorio:
Yes, you should open an issue with a patch in the bug tracker
Doh! And the link to the issue is:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255439
Thanks!
--
Markus Mann, CTS - FreeBSD Team
WWW: https://cts-solutions.at
Am 2021-04-27 12:10, schrieb Rodrigo Osorio:
On 4/27/21 9:23 AM, CTS - FreeBSD Team wrote:
Hello!
I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable
streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go.
On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11
and
Hello!
I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable
streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go.
On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11
and 12 (amd64). It installs fine and even runs afterwards.
How am i supposed to go on from here
Hi!
I have a problem to update Python on FreeBSD 13.0 RELEASE follow the
rules for portmaster in /usr/ports/UPDATING. It stopped wit py-gobject3:
self.evaluate_codeblock(codeblock)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py",
li
On 18-4-2021 16:51, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
On Sunday, 18 April 2021 14:00:01 CEST freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org
wrote:
So perhaps that is the best way to avoid having to deal with ABI/API
breakage...
After that it is up to the maintainers of the dependant packages to
update their package
s that Gtk itself does too (at least by default) :/
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/x11-toolkits/gtk30/
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^gtk3-3.24.27
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
head/x11/xorg-minimal
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=xorg-minimal
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
t Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
When one lacks enemies, one can always make them. -unknown
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
George Mitchell george+freebsd at m5p.com wrote on
Mon Apr 19 14:51:54 UTC 2021 :
> For me, https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/
> is more helpful, though I still haven't figured out where to find the
> *date* of any commit ...
Two ways starting from a tree view:
A) On the sa
Hi,
I'm the maintainer for the following ports:
brlaser
numix-gtk-theme
numix-icon-theme
As I'm no longer interested in FreeBSD, these ports are available for
adoption.
They require very little maintenance work.
Regards
Vincent
_______
fre
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:24:31AM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:52 AM The Doctor via freebsd-ports <
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> > Why am I getting:
> >
> > In file included from Unified_cpp_libsoundtouch_src0.cpp:47:
> &
ire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
When one lacks enemies, one can always make them. -unknown
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ng this?
--WjW
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
th Ceph is already quite a task, since that is a very fast
moving task.
--WjW
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ng this?
--WjW
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
Ceph has moved to Boost 1.75, so now it is build with the project.
Which is of course a pity.
Are there any plans to also get Boost 1.75 in ports?
--WjW
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
the package name, so the name of the
openHAB 3 package on Linux is just ‚openhab‘ as opposed to ‚openhab3‘. I think
that should also be reflected in the FreeBSD port.
Kind regards,
Thomas.
> Am 15.04.2021 um 20:03 schrieb Frank Preußer :
>
> Hello everybody
>
> openhab3 runs in
es it temporarily but returns to it's previous
levels after several hours (sometimes days). It's not specific to this
machine. I was previously running it on a virtual FreeBSD machine
(VMWare ESXi) and recently moved it to real hardware. The CPU
utilization is the same. It's
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2021-Apr-11 14:27:27 +0200, Helge Oldach wrote:
>Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports wrote on Sun, 11 Apr 2021 00:52:11 +0200 (CEST):
>> Following the SVN to GIT migration, portsnap is now the only practical
>> way to use ports on a low-memory system. I've done some experiments
On 2021-Apr-01 22:36:02 +1100, Trev wrote:
>> I just tried gitup and was told tha I had no permissions for
>> /var/db/gitup.
"sudo chown $USER /var/db/gitup" fixes that.
>I just tried gitup and it was killed after apparently exhausting my
>swap space. I had no such problem with portsnap :-(
On 2021-Apr-01 12:19:08 +0200, Felix Palmen wrote:
>* Christoph Moench-Tegeder [20210326 19:45]:
>> ## Felix Palmen (fe...@palmen-it.de):
>>
>> > I'd assume (someone may correct me) that portsnap will still be
>> > supported,
>>
>> https://lis
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:46 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## LuMiWa via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org):
>
> > portmaster -d cad/freecad
>
> That installs all the build dependencies (and the build dependencies
> of the dependencies, etc.) in your syste
rue since I built and installed back on
> 2021-Feb-11 and is true of my updating build started
> yesterday (bulk still in progress). LLVM10 pkg info
> from active install:
>
> # pkg info llvm10
> llvm10-10.0.1_5
> Name : llvm10
> Version: 10.0.1_5
> I
d style of use, if I
understand your usage correctly.
You may have other git use besides FreeBSD ports (now or
someday), so I'm cautious about claiming the specifics
below are fully appropriate, but you could do something
like:
git config --global advice.detachedHead false
to make detached HE
"stage/runaway" for 61 hours now.
http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=main-amd64-default&build=p569609_s5b3b19db73
(ipv6 only)
NB: I'm not involved in the pkg building cluster.
Regards,
Ronald.
Van: "O. Hartmann"
Datum: vrijdag, 9 april 2021 07:27
lean or the like.
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 07:17:18 +0900
Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/04/07 06:46:
> > I didn't install because it pull Python 2.7. I didn't change any
> > configuration. FreeCAD has just collada but other I left default. QT
> > Web eng
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:09:12 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## LuMiWa via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org):
>
> > I didn't install because it pull Python 2.7. I didn't change any
> > configuration.
>
> The question is not so much what you did
Version: 10.0.1_5
Installed on : Thu Feb 11 12:05:43 2021 PST
Origin : devel/llvm10
Architecture : FreeBSD:14:aarch64
Prefix : /usr/local
Categories : devel lang
Licenses : MIT, BSD3CLAUSE, PD, LLVM, REGEX, LLVM2
Maintainer : bro...@freebsd.org
WWW
courier ports as a
standalone package I have no objection, you can do that and submit a
port of the result, providing upstream tarball and all.
--
Guido Falsi
_______
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:14:21 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## LuMiWa via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org):
>
> > I try to install cad/freecad and it pulls lang/Python 27.
>
> FreeCAD itself depends on Python "3.6 or higher". What exactly did
> y
Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> -U default value can be changed in ${LOCALBASE}/etc/poudriere.conf, cannot it?
> The default value is defined in common.sh.
>
> GIT_PORTSURL="git.FreeBSD.org/ports.git"
> And
> poudriere ports -c -m git+https -B main
>
Yes, you can put GIT_PORTSURL into poudriere.conf and
[The original send attempt for this failed somehow.]
Eric Turgeon ericbsd at freebsd.org wrote on
Mon Apr 5 20:33:22 UTC 2021 :
> Today when trying to sync the GhostBSD ports tree with the FreeBSD ports
> tree, I found out the main branch history is not compatible with the old
> GitH
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 05/04/21 23:26, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
On 4/4/21 7:35 AM, Carmel wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:18:27 +, Rene Ladan stated:
...
Is or will poudriere default to using net/gitup in FreeBSD 13? Is there
a way to configure it in the "poudriere.conf" file?
There's a "git
Hello,
I am trying to port cmucl to RPI4-B RELEASE-13.0-RC3 (arm64-aarch64), but of
course I can't as port's and host's architectures are different.
Any method for cross-building/compiling this port? or any other port?
_______
freebsd-po
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ shows:
QUOTE
NameDescription IdleLinks
development
doc FreeBSD documentation tree 16 hourssummarylogtree
ports FreeBSD ports tree 57 min. summarylogtree
src FreeBSD source tree 3 days summarylogtree
END QUOTE
https
llard
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Carmel carmel_ny at outlook.com wrote on
Sun Apr 4 18:05:17 UTC 2021 :
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 19:49:04 +0200 (CEST), Helge Oldach stated:
> >Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote on Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:46:15
> >+0200 (CEST):
> >> running 12.2 STABLE, I would like a com
past april 1
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
Sat Apr 3 20:35:46 UTC 2021 :
> * Mark Millard via freebsd-ports [20210403
> 10:02]:
> > Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
> > > There was an announcement to deprecate it, but it's still built with
> >
On 03/04/21 18:10, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote:
It is not good. The last was I did red was "portsnap" stay still for
awhile. I am portsnap and portmaster user for years. Where should I
find information what will happened with /usr/ports. Will gitup just
replace, update? I am usi
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:10:33PM -0400, LuMiWa wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:51:29 -0600
> The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
> > freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via free
Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
Fri Apr 2 22:49:58 UTC 2021 :
> * Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports [20210403
> 00:35]:
> > On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > but I use pkg/portsnap .
> > >
> > > How does that affect us?
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:51:29 -0600
The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
> freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> > >&
On 03/04/21 13:50, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >>> On 03
rote:
> >>>> On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via fre
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 06:23:00AM +0200, Helge Oldach wrote:
> The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST):
> > Git is ready,
>
> Is it?
>
> # git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
> Cloning into 'ports&#
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:01:18PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-Apr-2, at 20:24, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> >> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conv
On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
Please install gitup and read it's man page, it's straight forward.
--
Guido Falsi
On 03/04/21 06:23, Helge Oldach wrote:
The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST):
Git is ready,
Is it?
# git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
Cloning into 'ports'...
fatal: repository 'https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git/'
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200
On 2021-Apr-2, at 20:24, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
>> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
>> following command:
>>
>> sed -e '/github.com/d' -e &#
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
> following command:
>
> sed -e '/github.com/d' -e 's/freebsd\/freebsd-//g' /usr/local/etc/gitup.conf
>
> t
On 2021-Apr-2, at 18:20, The Doctor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:54:48PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
>>>
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:54:48PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> > The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
> > Sat Apr 3 00:27:42 UTC 2021 :
> >
> > Results:
> >
>
On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard wrote:
> The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
> Sat Apr 3 00:27:42 UTC 2021 :
>
> Results:
>
>> gitup -v 1 ports
>> # Host: github.com
>> # Port: 443
>> # Repository: /freebsd/freebsd-por
1 - 100 of 1697 matches
Mail list logo
