Re: Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?

2016-10-02 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Matthew Rezny: > Qupzill-qt5 is a much better choice than qupzilla-qt4 due to the newer webkit > included in qt5, relative to qt4. That is version of webkit in qt5 (even 5.6) > is quite dated. > QupZilla 2.x is signiificantly different, re-written to use qtwebengine > instead > of

Re: Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?

2016-10-02 Thread Matthew Rezny
On Sunday 02 October 2016 08:00:03 Thomas Mueller wrote: > What is the status of www/seamonkey and prospect of updating from 2.39 to > the current 2.40, which was released from upstream on March 14, 2016? > > What makes me nervous is my bank saber-rattling about needing a more current > browser.

Re: Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?

2016-10-02 Thread Olivier Duchateau
On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 08:00:03 + "Thomas Mueller" wrote: Hi Thomas, > What is the status of www/seamonkey and prospect of updating from 2.39 to the > current 2.40, which was released from upstream on March 14, 2016? > > What makes me nervous is my bank saber-rattling

Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?

2016-10-02 Thread Thomas Mueller
What is the status of www/seamonkey and prospect of updating from 2.39 to the current 2.40, which was released from upstream on March 14, 2016? What makes me nervous is my bank saber-rattling about needing a more current browser. Seamonkey 2.39 worked on this bank, now it blocks me with error