Re: [CFT+Brainstorm] Extending the options framework

2012-12-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
Most of people sems happy with the new framework options however it could be yet better, here is an attempt to improve it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/options%2bradio%2bgroup.diff Among the complains people tends to find that OPTIONS_SINGLE aka 1 among N is nice but the 0 or 1 among N

Re: [CFT+Brainstorm] Extending the options framework

2012-12-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:16:40PM -0500, Thomas Mueller wrote: Most of people sems happy with the new framework options however it could be yet better, here is an attempt to improve it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/options%2bradio%2bgroup.diff Among the complains people tends to

[CFT+Brainstorm] Extending the options framework

2012-12-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, Most of people sems happy with the new framework options however it could be yet better, here is an attempt to improve it: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/options%2bradio%2bgroup.diff Among the complains people tends to find that OPTIONS_SINGLE aka 1 among N is nice but the 0 or 1 among