Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:02:23PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-ports wrote: > > Now we can get back on the ipv6 option. > > > > so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or > > without > > ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-10 Thread Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-ports
> Now we can get back on the ipv6 option. > > so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or > without > ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are > building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for it. > How

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-10 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Robert Huff writes: > Andrea Venturoli writes: > >> I'm building without IPv6, just because it's one (currently >> useless) less thing to worry about (settings, security, etc...). > > Phrased differently: one less possible failure mode. At the cost of one less possible success mode...

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-10 Thread Robert Huff
Andrea Venturoli writes: > I'm building without IPv6, just because it's one (currently > useless) less thing to worry about (settings, security, etc...). Phrased differently: one less possible failure mode. Respectfully, Robert Huff

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2019-Oct-09 16:30:48 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or >without >ipv6 for the ports side. Last time I checked, XDMCP differs enough between IPv4 and IPv6 that xdm used a compile-time option to pick which to support. --

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-10 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:55PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2019-Oct-09 16:30:48 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or > >without > >ipv6 for the ports side. > > Last time I checked, XDMCP differs enough between IPv4

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-10 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 2019-10-09 16:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hello. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for it. I'm building without IPv6, just because it's one (currently useless) less thing to worry about (settings,

[HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:14:13PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > > Yasuhiro KIMURA writes: > > > > > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > > > default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to