Hi,
I'm proposing the following patch:
--- bsd.port.mk
+++ bsd.port.mk
@@ -2180,6 +2180,10 @@
.endif
.endif
+.if defined(USE_CSTD)
+CFLAGS+= -std=${USE_CSTD}
+.endif
+
# Multiple make jobs support
.if defined(DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS) || defined(MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE)
_MAKE_JOBS=#
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea. This knob is completely superfluous and
thus should be avoided. One can just add -std to CFLAGS from a port
Makefile. Forced build are also possible without this stuff, you can set
this in /etc/make.conf.
So how
Ed Schouten escribió:
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea. This knob is completely superfluous and
thus should be avoided. One can just add -std to CFLAGS from a port
Makefile. Forced build are also possible without this stuff, you can set
this in
Ed Schouten escribió:
Hi,
I'm proposing the following patch:
--- bsd.port.mk
+++ bsd.port.mk
@@ -2180,6 +2180,10 @@
.endif
.endif
+.if defined(USE_CSTD)
+CFLAGS+= -std=${USE_CSTD}
+.endif
+
# Multiple make jobs support
.if defined(DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS) || defined(MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE)
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for LLVM, probably it won't work out for the whole ports
tree. I don't know what's the portmgr opinion on this, if we start to
use LLVM in Ports Collection, we should reconsider the knob, though.
LLVM/Clang support is trivial. Erwin Lansing
Hi,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 04:34:43PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for LLVM, probably it won't work out for the whole ports
tree. I don't know what's the portmgr opinion on this, if we start to
use LLVM in Ports Collection, we should reconsider
On Saturday 30 May 2009 16:21:52 Ed Schouten wrote:
Really, I really don't care how it's done, whether it's a flag or added
to the compiler flags directly. I'm just saying adding it to CFLAGS
directly sounds like a very bad idea. Adding it to /etc/make.conf sounds
even worse, because it
* Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.po...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
Are there any edge cases of (antiquated) ports that (indirectly) use
bsd.sys.mk and as such get hit by:
11 # the default is gnu99 for now
12 CSTD?= gnu99
In other words should one clean CFLAGS of -std before
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:01:38AM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote:
By the time FreeBSD-9 is released clang support will be solid and all
ports will compile with clang as well as gcc.
ooh, can I have unicorns, too? :-)
Seriously, I'd like to see the potential to throw the switch, with
the caveat that
