Hi guys,
If this is something good, I'll file a pr with it.
CVS Log:
- convert to RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST
remove x-generate-plist and friends
- use RF macro and remove SUBDIR where possible
- remove some uneeded GEM_NAME=${DISTNAME}
(this c/should be handled better in bsd.*.mk)
None of
Philip M. Gollucci píše v st 08. 04. 2009 v 12:10 -0400:
Hi guys,
If this is something good, I'll file a pr with it.
CVS Log:
- convert to RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST
remove x-generate-plist and friends
- use RF macro and remove SUBDIR where possible
- remove some uneeded
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Diff:
-
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/rubygems.diff
If only the individual ports are changed, we does not need to waste
resources on exp run. Just run these seven ports in Tinderbox...
Would have helped if you looked at the diff or did you and that still
Philip M. Gollucci píše v st 08. 04. 2009 v 14:50 -0400:
Diff:
-
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/rubygems.diff
If only the individual ports are changed, we does not need to waste
resources on exp run. Just run these seven ports in Tinderbox...
Would have helped if you
I will queue it for exp-run. But cannot guarantee it will run before the
freeze starts.
The only problem with that is that I have lots of 'port updates' for
rubygems-* pending that depend on the AUTOPLIST.
what a PITA.
When is the freeze supposed to be over ?
This is restricted to
Philip M. Gollucci píše v st 08. 04. 2009 v 15:03 -0400:
When is the freeze supposed to be over ?
Max two weeks, hopefully.
--
Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz
p...@freebsd.org
Bento's Law: If It Can Break, It Will Break Bento's Corollary: If It Can
Break, Kris Can Send Mail About It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:50:26 -0400
Philip M. Gollucci pgollu...@p6m7g8.com mentioned:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Diff:
-
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/rubygems.diff
If only the individual ports are changed, we does not need to waste
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby
ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited
to the affected ports only.
I've already run it on a tinderbox at $work (RideCharge Inc)
unfortunately its not
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:25:13 -0400
Philip M. Gollucci pgollu...@p6m7g8.com mentioned:
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby
ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited
to the affected ports only.
