On 2007-Mar-28 16:03:46 -0500, Corey Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ramblings of a long time FreeBSD user:
* Use the pkg_* tools to manage the system binaries too:
Imagine if installing the man pages would be as easy as:
pkg_add -r freebsd-6.1-man
As a general principal, this sounds good - and
Ramblings of a long time FreeBSD user:
* Use the pkg_* tools to manage the system binaries too:
Imagine if installing the man pages would be as easy as:
pkg_add -r freebsd-6.1-man
or upgrading from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE:
portupgrade -o system/freebsd-6.1 freebsd-6.2
even better (use
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:11:42AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Gary Kline pí?e v út 20. 03. 2007 v 21:05 -0800:
How about this idea for integrating into a new ports/package
project: say for people with a fast I686 who wanted -O3 and -pipe
and wanted his packages built
Gary Kline píše v út 20. 03. 2007 v 21:05 -0800:
How about this idea for integrating into a new ports/package
project: say for people with a fast I686 who wanted -O3 and -pipe
and wanted his packages built remotely rather than his own
computer. Would be be posssible
Hi all,
I know this may be more of a questions@ type of question, but I was
wondering if some people could provide me with short history (beyond the
last 3 months) and the tipping points of portmaster vs the portupgrade,
portinstall, etc tools.
I know portmaster is a bourne shell script and
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:52:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I know this may be more of a questions@ type of question, but I was
wondering if some people could provide me with short history (beyond the
last 3 months) and the tipping points of portmaster vs the portupgrade,
Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:52:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I know this may be more of a questions@ type of question, but I was
wondering if some people could provide me with short history (beyond the
last 3 months) and the tipping points of portmaster vs the
