Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi, Yes I will be fixing that in a new patch. The yadm tool has seen a new update just the other day so I'll merge this patch and the update into one ticket and skip messing with having to bump the PORTREVISION for that port. On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > A

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi! > > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be > > the > > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm > > to allow for Jinja2 template files. > >

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi! > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm > to allow for Jinja2 template files. Committed,

Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hello, A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm to allow for Jinja2 template files. signature.asc