Re: Cronjob Cvsup -> What?

2013-01-28 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:22:02 -0500 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I've always used "portsnap fetch update" after the initial "portsnap > fetch" and "portsnap extract". What would be the adverse side effect > of using svn instead? RW responded: > In general it's best to avoid mixing update tools unle

Re: Cronjob Cvsup -> What?

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 07:22, Thomas Mueller wrote: Unless you have a specific reason why portsnap doesn't fit your use case, it's definitely the way to go for just keeping a ports tree updated regularly. I've always used "portsnap fetch update" after the initial "portsnap fetch" and "portsnap extract".

Re: Cronjob Cvsup -> What?

2013-01-27 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
.. >Thomas Mueller wrote:> I've always used "portsnap fetch update" after the >initial "portsnap> fetch" and "portsnap extract".  What would be the adverse >side effect> of using svn instead?In general it's best to avoid mixing update >tools unless you fullyunderstand all the corner ca

Re: Cronjob Cvsup -> What?

2013-01-27 Thread RW
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:22:02 -0500 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I've always used "portsnap fetch update" after the initial "portsnap > fetch" and "portsnap extract". What would be the adverse side effect > of using svn instead? In general it's best to avoid mixing update tools unless you fully under

Re: Cronjob Cvsup -> What?

2013-01-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
"W. D." writes: > According to: > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > Cvsup is deprecated. If I have a Cron entry like: > #- > #Min HrDOM Mnth DOW Command > # At 3:46 in the morning, everyday, as ro