Evasive action may be needed: graphics/xfig-devel port deleted

2012-11-28 Thread David Wolfskill
I found out about this during may normal daily portmaster -ad run, which is one of the worst points for it to happen, as: ... === The graphics/xfig-devel port has been deleted: Has expired: Stable version is more recent than devel version === Aborting update Terminated Script done on Wed Nov

Re: Evasive action may be needed: graphics/xfig-devel port deleted

2012-11-28 Thread Eitan Adler
On 28 November 2012 08:43, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: I found out about this during may normal daily portmaster -ad run, which is one of the worst points for it to happen, as: ... === The graphics/xfig-devel port has been deleted: Has expired: Stable version is more recent

Re: Evasive action may be needed: graphics/xfig-devel port deleted

2012-11-28 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:46:28AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: ... After running portmaster -o graphics/xfig graphics/xfig-devel, I was able to proceed, but I would have appreciated an UPDATING entry. There is a file called MOVED which gives this information. Of course. But with

Re: Evasive action may be needed: graphics/xfig-devel port deleted

2012-11-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:01:38AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:46:28AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: ... After running portmaster -o graphics/xfig graphics/xfig-devel, I was able to proceed, but I would have appreciated an UPDATING entry. There is a file

Re: Evasive action may be needed: graphics/xfig-devel port deleted

2012-11-28 Thread Eitan Adler
On 28 November 2012 09:06, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:46:28AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: I've just done it. Thanks! -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list