From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Explain staging
On 03/10/2013 08:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
sorry, I still don't get it.
What is achived by staging?
There are 4 main advantages:
1) You can build a port and then create
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Explain staging
On 03/10/2013 08:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
sorry, I still don't get it.
What is achived by staging
From kpaas...@gmail.com Mon Oct 7 10:32:26 2013
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Explain staging
On 03/10/2013 08:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
sorry, I
07.10.2013 13:23, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
What about make fetch? It puts files by default under
ports/distfiles, which, by default, is 755:
[...]
What about make extract? Same problem:
I use svn repo owned by a user for ages. When a root rights are needed,
the ports infrastructure asks for
From b...@passap.ru Mon Oct 7 13:36:53 2013
07.10.2013 13:23, Anton Shterenlikht пиÑеÑ:
What about make fetch? It puts files by default under
ports/distfiles, which, by default, is 755:
[...]
What about make extract? Same problem:
I use svn repo owned by a user for ages. When a root
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From b...@passap.ru Mon Oct 7 13:36:53 2013
07.10.2013 13:23, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
What about make fetch? It puts files by default under
ports/distfiles, which, by default, is 755:
[...]
What about make extract?
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Nebdal dneb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From b...@passap.ru Mon Oct 7 13:36:53 2013
07.10.2013 13:23, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
What about make fetch? It puts files by default under
--On October 7, 2013 10:37:34 AM +0100 Anton Shterenlikht
me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
Set DISTDIR in make.conf to for example /home/memyself/distfiles and
move the existing distfiles there. There's no reasonable default for
DISTDIR I think if it's assumed that fetch operates as non-root.
-Kimmo
On 10/07/2013 04:37 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
snip
sure, I can do /tmp/distfiles too.
But that doesn't help with all the other failing targets.
Then I might as well chown -R user:group /usr/ports
and update the ports tree as an unprivileged user too.
HOwever, security would suffer, I
I'd recommend to
1) take excerpts from this topic and expand wiki - since here was a lot of
info
2) When port fails due to staging,add there link to wiki, so user / port
developer will see immediately where to dig.
Thanks.
2013/10/4 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:44:32PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have not been following discussions recently. There is this new thing
called staging. I don't seem able to find the original emails where
this was introduced.
Is there an email or a website which explains in some
From that stage a create can be directly created (even as a single user). or
the
stage can be sync into the filesystem.
You probably meant to write: From that stage a *package* can be
directly created ;)
It's easy to understand why this is so useful because the result of
the compilation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
You should have received 2 mails from me with some details about
staging: one called [HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree
and on called Staging, packages and more (very recent as of
yesterday)
I think the
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:15:11 +0200
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
Subject: Re: Explain staging
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:44:32PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have not been following discussions recently
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:45:51AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
You should have received 2 mails from me with some details about
staging: one called [HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree
and on called
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:45:51AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
You should have received 2 mails from me with some details about
staging: one called [HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree
and on called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
Here you are:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html
I
was referring the the previous one: [HEADSUP] Stage support for the
ports tree. Dunno if it had additional info or this
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
Here you are:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html
I
was referring the the previous one: [HEADSUP] Stage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
Here you are:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:44 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen
Montgomery-Smith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013
On 03/10/2013 08:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
sorry, I still don't get it.
What is achived by staging?
There are 4 main advantages:
1) You can build a port and then create a package from the stage
directory without having to install it on your build system. You
usually don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:22 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:21:19PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:22 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
I have not been following discussions recently. There is this new thing
called staging. I don't seem able to find the original emails where
this was introduced.
Is there an email or a website which explains in some detail how staging
works? It is badly messing with a port I am developing. I
can this wiki page help?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir
Jov
blog: http:amutu.com/blog http://amutu.com/blog
2013/10/3 Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
I have not been following discussions recently. There is this new thing
called staging. I don't seem able to find the
26 matches
Mail list logo
