[I've tested the proposed Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk fix.]
On 2019-May-21, at 17:15, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2019-May-21, at 16:20, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> I'm top posting because the problem originally reported seems to be
>> a later consequence of a much earlier problem. Looking in the logs
>>
On 2019-May-21, at 16:20, Mark Millard wrote:
> I'm top posting because the problem originally reported seems to be
> a later consequence of a much earlier problem. Looking in the logs
> showed lots of use of -I%%LOCALBASE%%/lib/gcc8/include/c++ and looking in:
>
>
I'm top posting because the problem originally reported seems to be
a later consequence of a much earlier problem. Looking in the logs
showed lots of use of -I%%LOCALBASE%%/lib/gcc8/include/c++ and looking in:
This was in a poudriere bulk build on a head -r347549 based powerpc64
system with system clang 8 for cc and c++ and base/binutils
for the likes of ld. But the build of qt5-core uses g++8.
The log shows:
--- .obj/qatomic.o ---
g++8 -c -O2 -pipe -g -fstack-protector-strong