Re: FYI: Unable to build -r501994 ports' devel/qt5-core on clang 8 based powerpc64 system: "Q_ATOMIC_INT64_IS_SUPPORTED must be defined on a 64-bit platform"

2019-05-21 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[I've tested the proposed Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk fix.] On 2019-May-21, at 17:15, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2019-May-21, at 16:20, Mark Millard wrote: > >> I'm top posting because the problem originally reported seems to be >> a later consequence of a much earlier problem. Looking in the logs >>

Re: FYI: Unable to build -r501994 ports' devel/qt5-core on clang 8 based powerpc64 system: "Q_ATOMIC_INT64_IS_SUPPORTED must be defined on a 64-bit platform"

2019-05-21 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2019-May-21, at 16:20, Mark Millard wrote: > I'm top posting because the problem originally reported seems to be > a later consequence of a much earlier problem. Looking in the logs > showed lots of use of -I%%LOCALBASE%%/lib/gcc8/include/c++ and looking in: > >

Re: FYI: Unable to build -r501994 ports' devel/qt5-core on clang 8 based powerpc64 system: "Q_ATOMIC_INT64_IS_SUPPORTED must be defined on a 64-bit platform"

2019-05-21 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
I'm top posting because the problem originally reported seems to be a later consequence of a much earlier problem. Looking in the logs showed lots of use of -I%%LOCALBASE%%/lib/gcc8/include/c++ and looking in:

FYI: Unable to build -r501994 ports' devel/qt5-core on clang 8 based powerpc64 system: "Q_ATOMIC_INT64_IS_SUPPORTED must be defined on a 64-bit platform"

2019-05-19 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
This was in a poudriere bulk build on a head -r347549 based powerpc64 system with system clang 8 for cc and c++ and base/binutils for the likes of ld. But the build of qt5-core uses g++8. The log shows: --- .obj/qatomic.o --- g++8 -c -O2 -pipe -g -fstack-protector-strong