Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

David Demelier wrote: > 2016-09-29 17:36 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > > Le 29/09/2016 à 17:03, Christian Weisgerber a écrit : > >> On 2016-09-14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >>> Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since > >>>

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Am 01.10.2016 um 10:03 schrieb Grzegorz Junka: > The fact that some source is hosted at a provider that doesn't close > their services, like Google does (aka GitHub), doesn't make it > "maintained". Is that your definition of "maintained", that the "the > code could be updated if needed"? If yes,

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On 30/09/2016 23:59, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2016-Sep-29 16:33:12 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Mathieu Arnold: If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about 30

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On 2016-Sep-29 16:33:12 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Christian Weisgerber >wrote: > >> Mathieu Arnold: >> >> > If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about >> > 30 seconds to click the automatic

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0200, David Demelier wrote: > We should provide a longer expiration date by keeping distfiles to our > FreeBSD mirrors for a while until the upstream moves to somewhere else. My past experience looking into such things tells me that once this happens the

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

2016-09-29 17:36 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > Le 29/09/2016 à 17:03, Christian Weisgerber a écrit : >> On 2016-09-14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> >>> Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since >>> August 2015, giving time to software

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Julian H. Stacey wrote on 09/29/2016 23:10: [...] We probably need a way to find out how often a pkg is downloaded from a repo to understand which ports/pkg are really used in our user base. This helps to decide if a port is really no longer in use. Insufficient test. I never download

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On 29.09.2016 21:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Christian Weisgerber wrote on 09/29/2016 18:57: Mathieu Arnold: If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about 30 seconds to click the automatic migration to github thing, and it is usually done within the hour,) since

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:33:12PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Christian Weisgerber > wrote: > > > Mathieu Arnold: > > > > > If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about > > > 30 seconds to click the automatic

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Mathieu Arnold: > > > If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about > > 30 seconds to click the automatic migration to github thing, and it is > > usually done within the hour,) since

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Hi, Reference: > From: Kurt Jaeger > Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:10:41 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > Christian Weisgerber wrote on 09/29/2016 18:57: > > > Mathieu Arnold: > > > > > >> If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about >

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Hi! > Christian Weisgerber wrote on 09/29/2016 18:57: > > Mathieu Arnold: > > > >> If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about > >> 30 seconds to click the automatic migration to github thing, and it is > >> usually done within the hour,) since march 2015, it is most

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Christian Weisgerber wrote on 09/29/2016 18:57: Mathieu Arnold: If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about 30 seconds to click the automatic migration to github thing, and it is usually done within the hour,) since march 2015, it is most likely abandoned and should

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Mathieu Arnold: > If the software has not been moved to some other place, (it takes about > 30 seconds to click the automatic migration to github thing, and it is > usually done within the hour,) since march 2015, it is most likely > abandoned and should not be kept in the ports tree. That's a

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

Le 29/09/2016 à 17:03, Christian Weisgerber a écrit : > On 2016-09-14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since >> August 2015, giving time to software developers to move their >> development some place else. All the

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On 2016-09-14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since > August 2015, giving time to software developers to move their > development some place else. All the distribution files that still use > solely googlecode.com as

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:19:18PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Hello, > > Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since > August 2015, giving time to software developers to move their > development some place else. All the distribution files that still use > solely

Google Code as an upstream is gone

Hello, Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since August 2015, giving time to software developers to move their development some place else. All the distribution files that still use solely googlecode.com as their source have been marked BROKEN today in r422140[2],