Re: HEADS DOWN (was Re: HEADS UP: putenv, setenv, unsetenv, getenv changes)

2007-05-02 Thread David Schultz
On Wed, May 02, 2007, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:45PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > All backed out. > > > > Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug > > reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so > > strong opposition a

Re: HEADS DOWN (was Re: HEADS UP: putenv, setenv, unsetenv, getenv changes)

2007-05-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:45PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > All backed out. > > Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug > reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so > strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continue that. >

Re: HEADS DOWN (was Re: HEADS UP: putenv, setenv, unsetenv, getenv changes)

2007-05-01 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Harald Schmalzbauer escribió: Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2007 schrieb Andrey Chernov: All backed out. Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continu

HEADS DOWN (was Re: HEADS UP: putenv, setenv, unsetenv, getenv changes)

2007-05-01 Thread Andrey Chernov
All backed out. Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continue that. Anyone who interested in POSIX can dig out what changes and how through cvs