On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:30:35PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:37:50AM +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:13:35 +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:22:23PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
Putting 'infrared' into the search box here:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:13:35 +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:22:23PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
Putting 'infrared' into the search box here:
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
fails to list this port, because its description is spelled wrong.
Daniel no longer maintains this. So I
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:37:50AM +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:13:35 +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:22:23PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
Putting 'infrared' into the search box here:
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
fails to list this port, because
Putting 'infrared' into the search box here:
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
fails to list this port, because its description is spelled wrong.
Daniel no longer maintains this. So I suppose the listing, long
description, and Makefile contacts should be cut over to ports@.
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:22:23PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
Putting 'infrared' into the search box here:
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
fails to list this port, because its description is spelled wrong.
Daniel no longer maintains this. So I suppose the listing, long
description, and Makefile