Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 02.09.2009 at 19:45:45 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: > > Thanks a lot for replies! The patch is now committed. Really, the > more results I got the more compicated it was to choose the best > mirror order so I did stick with fastest mirrors f

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread CmdLnKid
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:07 -, amdmi3 wrote: * Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: heanet seems to be the only one that reach > 1MB/s from all the tested locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. Agreed. Also, I'd like at least one more result from USA. Here is two: Fro

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Wesley Shields (w...@freebsd.org) wrote: > There is ports-mgmt/fastest_sites which sorts based upon round-trip time > for the TCP handshake to complete. It's not accurate for download speeds > but it provides a rough approximation for minimal effort. Thought there was something like that, but t

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Wesley Shields
(Trimming CC line...) On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:26:33PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com) wrote: > > > > In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by > > > surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. > > > dfn, garr: and ovh

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com) wrote: > > In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by > > surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. > > dfn, garr: and ovh fail. > > It might be way too much work for very little benefit, but network latencies > being w

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, September 02, 2009 04:05:08 -0500 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. dfn, garr: and ovh fail. It might be way too much work for very little benefit, but network latencie

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: Thanks a lot for replies! The patch is now committed. Really, the more results I got the more compicated it was to choose the best mirror order so I did stick with fastest mirrors for Europe and US, as other countries like Japan and Indonesia just give

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread parv
in message <20090902120700.gd1...@hades.panopticon>, wrote Dmitry Marakasov thusly... > > * Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: > > > heanet seems to be the only one that reach > 1MB/s from all the tested > > locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. > > Agreed. > > Also, I'd like at

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread dikshie
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh > to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) > and/or to mail me so I improve sorting. Expect the script to download > 200MB - it do

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread dikshie
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh > to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) > and/or to mail me so I improve sorting. Expect the script to download > 200MB - it do

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: > >> heanet seems to be the only one that reach > 1MB/s from all the tested >> locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. > > Agreed. > > Also, I'd like at least one more r

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: > heanet seems to be the only one that reach > 1MB/s from all the tested > locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. Agreed. Also, I'd like at least one more result from USA. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:55:49 +0200 Alex Dupre wrote: > Dmitry Marakasov ha scritto: > > Also, you can use this script: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh to find the fastest > > mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) and/or to > > mail me so I improve sorting. > > T

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Alex Dupre
Dmitry Marakasov ha scritto: > Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh > to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) > and/or to mail me so I improve sorting. The script doesn't take into account that the word "saved" is localized

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Pav Lucistnik
This looks quite impressive. Please commit it. Dmitry Marakasov píše v st 02. 09. 2009 v 07:14 +0400: > Hi! > > Second (smaller) part ready. This eliminates SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED as it > is not really needed, also translates all SFE ports to new SF scheme. > > Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~am

Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-01 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
Hi! Second (smaller) part ready. This eliminates SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED as it is not really needed, also translates all SFE ports to new SF scheme. Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sourceforge-extended.patch Here's a little stats on SF mirrors (mirrors were taken from sourceforge mirror se