Re: Patch for ports on 10-current

2011-10-11 Thread Nali Toja
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes: http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch [...] +.if ${OSVERSION} = 100 !defined(NO_AUTOTOOLS_FIX) Being not limited to GNU_CONFIGURE, is it a feature? Also, there are a few ports that either set WRKSRC instead of BUILD_WRKSRC or extract several distfiles. Why

Patch for ports on 10-current

2011-10-10 Thread Doug Barton
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some tools to work with: http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch You need to do the equivalent of

Re: Patch for ports on 10-current

2011-10-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 10/10/2011 15:00, Nali Toja wrote: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes: Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some

Re: Patch for ports on 10-current

2011-10-10 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some tools to

Re: Patch for ports on 10-current

2011-10-10 Thread Nali Toja
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes: Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some tools to work with: