Brooks Davis píše v po 05. 12. 2011 v 10:15 -0600:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> > needs to stay at its current valu
No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon.
--
Zhihao Yuan
On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this re
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> that's fine.
We d
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> that's fine.
devel/clang a
I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
that's fine.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
portmgr@:
Clang 3.0 is released and about to replace the clang-2.9 in ports.
Pure 0.47 in ports does not build with 3.0, so I must make sure
ports/161799 can be committed soon. From now on, 18 hours. If I do not
get a response from portmgr@ with in 18 hours, I'll assume my request,
to add the bsd.
Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The
total existing addons are listed here:
http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons
I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long
> time, since it seem that to put a
>
> .if defined(USE_PURE)
> .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk"
> .endif
>
> In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Thoug
Hi,
The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long
time, since it seem that to put a
.if defined(USE_PURE)
.include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk"
.endif
In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular as
some languages like PHP or Python, but it does a
