Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-14 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dominic Fandrey píše v po 14. 12. 2009 v 16:54 +0100: > Can't you just take a jail? Just wondering ... No, unfortunately, jail won't do. The box must be fully dedicated. -- Pav Lucistnik See file. Click file. Get file. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-14 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Jonathan píše v čt 10. 12. 2009 v 09:50 -0500: >> On 12/8/2009 7:52 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> What is the policy for package building nodes? I mean, is it possible to >>> use some machines not owned directy by FreeBSD.org? >>> For example, I have spare machine in our ra

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-12 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Jonathan píše v čt 10. 12. 2009 v 09:50 -0500: > On 12/8/2009 7:52 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > > What is the policy for package building nodes? I mean, is it possible to > > use some machines not owned directy by FreeBSD.org? > > For example, I have spare machine in our rack which I can lend

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-10 Thread Jonathan
On 12/8/2009 7:52 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: What is the policy for package building nodes? I mean, is it possible to use some machines not owned directy by FreeBSD.org? For example, I have spare machine in our rack which I can lend for some period (until some production machine goes down and n

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Mark Linimon wrote: [...] Two data points: one, it looks like Pav having marked www/p5-Gtk2-WebKit as broken had already been taken into account for the amd64 build, so it didn't have that problem. And two, some of our i386 machines are indeed underpowered. We've added several new, more moder

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Mark Linimon píše v út 08. 12. 2009 v 14:17 -0600: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:15:13AM -0300, oren.al...@gmail.com wrote: > > and some poinyhat build runs are never uploaded. > > Hmm, they should be. I'll forward this on to pav. (The way we have the > work divided up is that pav does amd64; er

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:15:13AM -0300, oren.al...@gmail.com wrote: >> For the last couple of days I have been following the pointyhat build >> statistics provided at >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html > > Brave man :-) That's one I set up. > >>

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread oren . almog
On 12/8/2009 5:17 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: But now you know the contents of (part of) my todo list. mcl Good luck and thank you very much for a thorough and informative reply. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:15:13AM -0300, oren.al...@gmail.com wrote: > For the last couple of days I have been following the pointyhat build > statistics provided at > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html Brave man :-) That's one I set up. > As seen on that page, the build

Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread oren . almog
Hello, I understand that there are many who are not really interested in binary packages and are much more happy compiling everything from source but for me this is not a viable option, especially with large ports such as kde, gnome, openoffice etc... For the last couple of days I have been