On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:32:06AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:43:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
This makes no sense at all, since X.org is (by definition) X11R7.
They changed the protocol? I thought that was what the suffix was
originally for.
No, not
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 21:43 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Dejan Lesjak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] as far as X.org 7 ports themselves go, they right now already
happily build and install under /usr/X11R6 prefix [...]
This makes no sense at all, since X.org is (by definition) X11R7.
What's the gain? Transition will be a really big PITA for most existing
users. Everybody who would be trying to install a KDE/GNOME or even a
general X11 port after a switchover still having all X11 bits in
/usr/X11R6 is likely to be screwed on build time, due to mismatching
includes/libraries
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:58 -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
What's the gain? Transition will be a really big PITA for most existing
users. Everybody who would be trying to install a KDE/GNOME or even a
general X11 port after a switchover still having all X11 bits in
/usr/X11R6 is likely to be
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:09:27 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello;
--- Dejan Lesjak [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Friday 14 July 2006 01:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
Just here mumbling...
It would be interesting to set
X11BASE=/usr/X11 when using XFree86 and
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:10:01PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:59:08PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:56 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:39PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
Those man pages for whatis are pretty
On Thu, 2006-Jul-13 01:53:47 +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: It should be
possible to make a shell skript that seds through shell scripts,
moves everything around and fixes /var/db/pkg without having to
rebuild anything.
.la files have absolute pathnames embedded in them. I think you can
virtually
Hi;
Just here mumbling...
It would be interesting to set
X11BASE=/usr/X11 when using XFree86 and
X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} when using XOrg.
Not only due to historical consistency (/usr/X11 is the path recommended in
XFree86 manpages), but as a way to be able to use XFree86 and keep the system
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:34:22PM -0500, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
Dejan Lesjak wrote:
Hello,
There were a couple of debates already concerning /usr/X11R6 as prefix for
X11 ports and a bunch of other ports that currently by default install
there. Quite some people were, when
What about duplicated file names?
On my desktop:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/{X11R6,local}/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 162506 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/X11R6/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 48606 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/local/man/whatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
On 7/12/06, Fred Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about duplicated file names?
On my desktop:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/{X11R6,local}/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 162506 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/X11R6/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 48606 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/local/man/whatis
Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically
different in size. Maybe they are mergeable, but
there's going to be a fair amount of work doing that
for all possible conflicts.
I don't have all the ports installed on my machine, so
this is not a complete list.
Fred
--- michael johnson [EMAIL
michael johnson wrote:
On 7/12/06, Dejan Lesjak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There were a couple of debates already concerning /usr/X11R6 as prefix
for
X11
ports and a bunch of other ports that currently by default install there.
Quite some people were, when creating a new port that
On 7/12/06, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael johnson wrote:
On 7/12/06, Dejan Lesjak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There were a couple of debates already concerning /usr/X11R6 as prefix
for
X11
ports and a bunch of other ports that currently by default install
there.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:59:08PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:56 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:39PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically
different in size. Maybe they are mergeable, but
there's
On 7/13/06, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:56 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:39PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically
different in size. Maybe they are mergeable, but
there's going to be a
16 matches
Mail list logo
