Re: Which wine do I need?
On Sun, 28 May 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > What do you guys think about the following patch for emulators/wine > to help clarify this? I now applied this to help clarify for others (just changing lang/i386-wine to emulators/i386-wine - too much lang/gcc* work recently ;-). Gerald ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Which wine do I need?
On Mon, 15 May 2017, David Naylor wrote: >> I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for >> amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. > - On an i386 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. > - On an amd64 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/i386-wine. > - On an amd64 environment with 64-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. What do you guys think about the following patch for emulators/wine to help clarify this? Gerald Index: pkg-descr === --- pkg-descr (revision 441876) +++ pkg-descr (working copy) @@ -5,8 +5,12 @@ a similar look and feel to other applications on your desktop. Many applications already work, more or less, including versions of -Microsoft Office and several games. +Microsoft Office and many games. +Use this port for 32-bit Windows binaries in an i386 environment or +64-bit Windows binaries in an amd64 environment; use lang/i386-wine +for 32-bit Windows binaries in an amd64 environment. + WWW: http://www.winehq.org/ Gerald Pfeifer___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Which wine do I need?
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 23:23:05 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for > amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. - On an i386 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. - On an amd64 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/i386-wine. - On an amd64 environment with 64-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. Note: a i386 chroot would be considered an i386 environment (even if the host environment/kernel was amd64) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Which wine do I need?
I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. from David Naylor: > On Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:16:55 Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for > > amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. > > I don't really want i386-wine as such, since I would install wine on i386 > > and could then mount this partition at /compat/i386 to run from amd64, > > while retaining the ability to run from straight i386. > This is effectively what i386-wine does: it bundles the required 32-bit > libraries from a i386 host/environment and packages them such that they can > run on an amd64 machine. > > Am I correct that I would build wine (or wine-devel) on i386 and then > > install wine or wine-devel on amd64? > Correct, you should use the same port for both i386 and amd64, however if you > are running Windows programs from /compat/i386 then there is no need to > install wine on the amd64 host (unless you want to run 64-bit programs). > > Am I better off doing this on FreeBSD 11-STABLE or on 12-HEAD? > Normally CURRENT doesn't cause issues with wine, however STABLE will more, > well, more stable. I wouldn't base the decision of CURRENT/STABLE on whats > best for Wine. We do, however, need more people to test CURRENT. My thought for building FreeBSD 11-STABLE for i386 is being better able to run wine from amd64, either HEAD or STABLE. I think there might be problems using wine on i386 HEAD from 11-STABLE amd64? Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Which wine do I need?
Hi On Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:16:55 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for > amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. > > I don't really want i386-wine as such, since I would install wine on i386 > and could then mount this partition at /compat/i386 to run from amd64, > while retaining the ability to run from straight i386. This is effectively what i386-wine does: it bundles the required 32-bit libraries from a i386 host/environment and packages them such that they can run on an amd64 machine. > Am I correct that I would build wine (or wine-devel) on i386 and then > install wine or wine-devel on amd64? Correct, you should use the same port for both i386 and amd64, however if you are running Windows programs from /compat/i386 then there is no need to install wine on the amd64 host (unless you want to run 64-bit programs). > Am I better off doing this on FreeBSD 11-STABLE or on 12-HEAD? Normally CURRENT doesn't cause issues with wine, however STABLE will more, well, more stable. I wouldn't base the decision of CURRENT/STABLE on whats best for Wine. We do, however, need more people to test CURRENT. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Which wine do I need?
I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. I don't really want i386-wine as such, since I would install wine on i386 and could then mount this partition at /compat/i386 to run from amd64, while retaining the ability to run from straight i386. Am I correct that I would build wine (or wine-devel) on i386 and then install wine or wine-devel on amd64? Am I better off doing this on FreeBSD 11-STABLE or on 12-HEAD? Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"