Doug Barton wrote:
If we have maintainers who are willing to keep these things
up to date and people agree that this is an acceptable [way]
Well, I'm not so sure about the ones I don't use, but the ones I do use
are usualyl well maintained (either that or they get a PR form me), but
there's
On 08/09/2010 07:00, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 21:32, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 09/07/2010 09:09 PM, Rob Farmer wrote:
Around 6 months ago, a similar thing was proposed for a number of
eclipse plugins - they can all be installed and updated via the
builtin update
Dear port committers,
I understand that infofarmer@ and miwi@ have no more enough free
time to be hyper-active about those and other ports (and btw, thanks
very much for the huge work you did in the past!), but is out there
anyone else out there with both a commit bit and some time on hand to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/10 16:39, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Dear port committers,
I understand that infofarmer@ and miwi@ have no more enough free
time to be hyper-active about those and other ports (and btw, thanks
very much for the huge work you did in the
Quoth Lapo Luchini on Tuesday, 07 September 2010:
Dear port committers,
I understand that infofarmer@ and miwi@ have no more enough free
time to be hyper-active about those and other ports (and btw, thanks
very much for the huge work you did in the past!), but is out there
anyone else out
--- Original message ---
From: Lapo Luchini l...@lapo.it
To: po...@freebsd.org
Cc: infofar...@freebsd.org, m...@freebsd.org, s...@freebsd.org
Sent: 7.9.'10, 20:39
Dear port committers,
I understand that infofarmer@ and miwi@ have no more enough free
time to be hyper-active about
On 09/07/2010 09:39 AM, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Dear port committers,
I understand that infofarmer@ and miwi@ have no more enough free
time to be hyper-active about those and other ports (and btw, thanks
very much for the huge work you did in the past!), but is out there
anyone else out there
On 09/07/2010 01:20 PM, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
For those that we are simply
repackaging, what's the value in doing that, vs. simply allowing
users to download them from mozilla's site?
Well, in vastly multi-user places there might of course be good reasons
to have a single
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 19:39, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
My concern with this for some time is that there is little to no actual
benefit for the vast majority of these ports, however they do consume
resources. Admittedly not an overwhelming number of resources, but given the
fact
On 09/07/2010 09:09 PM, Rob Farmer wrote:
Around 6 months ago, a similar thing was proposed for a number of
eclipse plugins - they can all be installed and updated via the
builtin update manager and nothing is built for FreeBSD - they are
just Java stuff that can be binary downloaded and run
Doug Barton wrote:
Are these eclipse plugins similar to mozilla plugins in that the user
has to take an additional step after the FreeBSD package is added, or if
the package is on the system then it's available to all the users
immediately? If the latter, then I can understand why having
On 09/07/2010 09:36 PM, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Are these eclipse plugins similar to mozilla plugins in that the user
has to take an additional step after the FreeBSD package is added, or if
the package is on the system then it's available to all the users
immediately? If the
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 21:32, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 09/07/2010 09:09 PM, Rob Farmer wrote:
Around 6 months ago, a similar thing was proposed for a number of
eclipse plugins - they can all be installed and updated via the
builtin update manager and nothing is built for
Rob Farmer wrote:
Do users have to run some command to import the plugins into their
~/.mozilla profiles after root installs them or is it automatic?
Homedir of the iser isn't really involved, Firefox/Thunderbird/SeaMonkey
expect the system to have system-wide packages available in system
14 matches
Mail list logo
