Hi
I found this page
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-July/076542.htmlwhile
i searching fix clang compile problem
http://developer.berlios.de/patch/download.php?id=3460 this patch is fix (
Work at least for me :) )
___
Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:37:30AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
libpng
= 1.2.5? It seems to be exist at least from libpng 1.2.5
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:37:45PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:37:30AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
libpng
= 1.2.5? It seems to be exist
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Ping! Were there any testers of the updated slim port? If yes,
please, speak up.
WFM now, the only problem I had faced is introduced incompatibility with
clang but that has mostly nothing to do with the port. I filed a bug at
Volodymyr, good day.
Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:51:32PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Ping! Were there any testers of the updated slim port? If yes,
please, speak up.
WFM now,
Great, thanks for testing!
the only problem I had faced is introduced
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
the only problem I had faced is introduced incompatibility with
clang but that has mostly nothing to do with the port. I filed a bug at
http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbuggroup_id=2663bug_id=18667
but with no progress though.
I am currently rebuilding all my
Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
libpng
= 1.2.5? It seems to be exist at least from libpng 1.2.5
(http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng-1.2.5-manual.html) so it's
safe to use it?
Should be. But according to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/10/2012 03:01, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/09/2012 01:13, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
This very error should be fixed by the patch
Yes, I'm an idiot. :) I successfully applied your
I'm testing the patch.
First, I failed to build, and the reason is that my cmake is 2.8.3
which is too old.
According to
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake-commits/2012-February/012056.html,
it seems like that after cmake 2.8.7, find_package(X11) would define
X11_Xmu_LIB, but before that, it
Oh I'm sorry. After grabbing cmake 2.8.7, I found that Xmu is still
detected in find_package(GLUT).
We need a build dependency on cmake 2.8.8..
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Henry Hu henry.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm testing the patch.
First, I failed to build, and the reason is that my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/2012 01:13, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
This very error should be fixed by the patch
Yes, I'm an idiot. :) I successfully applied your patch and forgot to
move the new patch- file into files/. Once I fixed the PEBKAC it worked
as expected on
Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/09/2012 01:13, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
This very error should be fixed by the patch
Yes, I'm an idiot. :) I successfully applied your patch and forgot to
move the new patch- file into files/.
Shouldn't it appear in files/
On 07/05/2012 06:09, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Thanks for taking this one on. I was also looking at the new version of
slim that's out recently: http://slim.berlios.de/
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:09:30PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails to start the desktop, though it has a mix
of old and new packages, so I am rebuilding them just now.
Was a problem with D-BUS an newer Xorg,
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:09:30PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails to start the desktop, though it has a mix
of old and new packages, so I am rebuilding them just now.
Was a problem
Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Thanks for taking this one on. I was also looking at the new version of
slim that's out recently: http://slim.berlios.de/
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails to start the desktop,
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:04:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Thanks for taking this one on. I was also looking at the new version of
slim that's out recently: http://slim.berlios.de/
I am running 1.3.4 for some time: most of my workstations are fine
with it, but one fails
17 matches
Mail list logo
