Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:20:55 +0200):
>
>> So you prefer imposing yet another dependency on the user is less evil
>> than adding few lines of extra code in port Makefile?
>>
>> Interesting PoV.
>
> We're talking about 4.x. It's o
Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:20:55 +0200):
> So you prefer imposing yet another dependency on the user is less evil
> than adding few lines of extra code in port Makefile?
>
> Interesting PoV.
We're talking about 4.x. It's on the way out. So it's about increased
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:20:55PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Brooks Davis p??e v po 07. 08. 2006 v 16:06 -0500:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Boris Samorodov p??e v ?t 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis w
Brooks Davis píše v po 07. 08. 2006 v 16:06 -0500:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov p??e v ?t 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400:
> > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:03:57 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:24:49AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > I'd suggest using not using an absolute path in the TAR definition
> > > since the dependency check doesn't and
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:03:57PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:24:49AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -040
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Boris Samorodov p??e v ?t 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400:
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kenn
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:24:49AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400
Boris Samorodov píše v út 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Sam
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >
> > > > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
> > > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> > > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extract
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
> > 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:28:16 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
> > 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may b
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
> 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using
> USE_BZIP2 knob and d
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
> 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using
> USE_BZIP2 knob and d
Hi!
We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using
USE_BZIP2 knob and doing gunzipping at after-extract:.
Does someone know a better solution?
Does w
16 matches
Mail list logo