Hi!
> Le 12/07/2019 à 01:17, Adam Weinberger a écrit :
> > We really would love to be able to provide release or LTS branches,
> > but it simply comes down to resources. We'd need a few people working
> > in paid positions to manage RE environments. The FreeBSD Foundation
> > (which underwrites a
Hi!
> Am 12.07.2019 um 10:34 schrieb David Demelier :
> I'm not sure how can a LTS branch that you usually never update (except CVE,
> security fixes) take more time than quarterly branches that you need to
> recreate every 3 months and do some merges.
The problem is that you need to backport
Le 12/07/2019 à 01:17, Adam Weinberger a écrit :
We really would love to be able to provide release or LTS branches,
but it simply comes down to resources. We'd need a few people working
in paid positions to manage RE environments. The FreeBSD Foundation
(which underwrites a couple very
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 7:18 AM David Demelier wrote:
>
> Le 10/07/2019 à 13:59, Jan Beich a écrit :
> > Why not use binary packages? Or why not build a quarterly branch?
> > Or does anyone have better ideas?
>
> Unfortunately quarterly branches do not solve anything. They are just to
> short to
Le 10/07/2019 à 13:59, Jan Beich a écrit :
Why not use binary packages? Or why not build a quarterly branch?
Or does anyone have better ideas?
Unfortunately quarterly branches do not solve anything. They are just to
short to have any benefit. Let say you build a package in January and
then
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 00:01, Jan Beich wrote:
>
> (CC'ing appropriate public list. If you want me to care don't send private
> mails.)
>
> Jason de Cordoba writes:
>
> > OMG
> >
> > Please stick with something stable and don't update this port 5-6 times
> > a month.
> >
> > Thanks for your
(CC'ing appropriate public list. If you want me to care don't send private
mails.)
Jason de Cordoba writes:
> OMG
>
> Please stick with something stable and don't update this port 5-6 times
> a month.
>
> Thanks for your contributions to FreeBSD
>
> Have a great day,
>
> Jason
I mainly bump
I'm at a loss here; I could be tired, but I cant find if video4linux
has been enabled in ffmpeg (or disabled). There's nothing in the
makefile either. For the life of me I cannot get it use a webcamd device
- all I get is unknown input format.
I'm using ffplay (not that should make a
On 03/24/12 23:31, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:12:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
I'm at a loss here; I could be tired, but I cant find if video4linux
has been enabled in ffmpeg (or disabled). There's nothing in the
makefile either. For the life of me I cannot get it use a
