Re: gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

Thanks, Manish. Very non-standard syntax, that. So evidently when pkg claims that the repositories are current, as it did, it may be, in effect, lying. Which suggests that *it* should be doing the forced update as step 3 in its attempt to get good bits. [sigh] [Default] On Mon, 28 Aug

Re: gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

On 08/28/17 16:58, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > [Default] On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:08:05 +0200, Jan Beich > wrote: > >> Try running: pkg update -f > > Are you thinking of something else, perhaps? The man page > doesn't show an -f switch, and pkg thinks the repositories

Re: gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

[Default] On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:08:05 +0200, Jan Beich wrote: >Try running: pkg update -f Are you thinking of something else, perhaps? The man page doesn't show an -f switch, and pkg thinks the repositories were already current, which is why (I suppose) it tried a remote

Re: gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

writes: > 17:22:34 Sun, 27 Aug > [momcat:root]~> pkg install gtkmm30 > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. > The following 7 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be

gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

17:22:34 Sun, 27 Aug [momcat:root]~> pkg install gtkmm30 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. The following 7 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: gtkmm30: 3.22.0 pangomm: