Re: hm... boo[ze|st] anyone?

2009-03-23 Thread Alexander Churanov
2009/3/23 Dmitry Marakasov :
> Is there anything to make you think so besides ports broken with
> boost 1.37? I hope we'll be able to fix all of those before the
> deadline and freeze. Actually, the only port left is OOo which I
> currently have some trouble making to fail on my dev box (as opposed
> to tinderbox).

Now nothing. I saw the wiki page is updated frequently with "fixed"
comments or PR numbers. Thank you and all guys who are working on it.
I've never had sufficient time to fix all dependent ports if working
alone.

Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hm... boo[ze|st] anyone?

2009-03-23 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:

> In brief, you'll get boost-1.38 (and then 1.39) very soon, but
> probably not in /usr/local/include/boost.

Is there anything to make you think so besides ports broken with
boost 1.37? I hope we'll be able to fix all of those before the
deadline and freeze. Actually, the only port left is OOo which I
currently have some trouble making to fail on my dev box (as opposed
to tinderbox).

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hm... boo[ze|st] anyone?

2009-03-21 Thread Alexander Churanov
Oliver,

In brief, you'll get boost-1.38 (and then 1.39) very soon, but
probably not in /usr/local/include/boost.

The main issue in updating deve/boost is in large number of ports that
depend on it. This work is in progress and there is some real progress
with it.

As for the alternate port of 1.38 with non-system (versioned) layout -
I've just created that and going to present it and start a discussion
in a few days after doing some testing.

I'm sure that after 1.38 is ported, 1.39 will be ported with minimal
delay, since I hope there are no new decisions to make.

The status of porting is recorded at
http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject.

Alexander Churanov,
maintainer of devel/boost

P.S. Regarding the subject of the message: I hardly recognized that
it's relevant to me. Plain text "boost" or (and better) "devel/boost"
increases chances for the message to be answered. It really easy to
overlook a fancy-titled message.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


hm... boo[ze|st] anyone?

2009-03-19 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi,

once more - beside the other mails about boost over the last weeks...

What is the status regarding boost being updated to a more recent version
or creating boost-devel,boost136,boost137,boost,138,boost-whatever?

I'm just curious because I could need boost >= 1.36.

-- 
 Oliver Lehmann
  http://www.pofo.de/
  http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"