=1.1.19_1 make
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! multimedia/libxine (libxine-1.1.19_1) (fetch error)
Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range
=1.1.19_1 make
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! multimedia/libxine (libxine-1.1.19_1) (fetch error)
Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range
UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.1.19_1 make
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! multimedia/libxine (libxine-1.1.19_1) (fetch error)
Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:30:30AM +, David Southwell wrote:
Thanks in advance for a fix for:
[...]
Was already fixed by makc@,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/multimedia/libxine/Makefile.diff?r1=1.164;r2=1.165
please, update your ports, and try again.
--
Eygene Ryabinkin
/portupgrade20110116-17387-2evu20-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade
UPGRADE_PORT=libxine-1.1.19_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.1.19_1 make
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! multimedia/libxine (libxine-1.1.19_1) (fetch error
Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:30:30AM +, David Southwell wrote:
Thanks in advance for a fix for:
[...]
Was already fixed by makc@,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/multimedia/libxine/Makefile.di
ff?r1=1.164;r2=1.165 please, update your ports, and try again.
Yep the fix
On 1/16/2011 12:18 PM, David Southwell wrote:
Please do not top post
Initially reporting to list and getting feedback ensures that PRs are not filed
unecessarily
David
Oh sorry. I interpreted Thanks in advance for a fix for: as the
equivalent of an imperative statement to fix it. rather
John, good day.
Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:01:21PM +0100, John Marino wrote:
1) David Southwell found a problem with the libxine port missing a
source file
2) He posted what he found here, expecting it to be fixed (presumably
immediately)
Wouldn't the proper procedure be to document this in