On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
If you still think there is no difference, I will send you full build
logs both with and without the
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
If you still think there is no difference, I will send you full
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
Poudriere logs are posted here:
https://zeno.apeiron.net/unison/test1/
On 03/26/15 16:34, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:41AM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 18:32, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
I'll reply below with my
PERSONAL opinions about such requests.
I reword it: the opinions below are personal and don't reflect the
opinions of the
On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
Poudriere logs are posted here:
https://zeno.apeiron.net/unison/test1/
With the config at the above link,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:41AM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
If you still think there is no
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar
On 03/21/15 21:53, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 21.03.2015, at 19:10, Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net wrote:
On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
I recently (after last upgrade of poudriere-devel, although I do not know
if that is the cause) ran into a comparable issue with unison without X11 :
On 21.03.2015, at 15:50, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Which means that if unsetting X11 on in the port and not globally ocaml
is built with X11 and unison without - which poudriere will fail on when
it tries to find the dependencies...
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon,
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
This leads me to think there is some misalignment of the X11 option in
your setup, that's why I asked for the full log of the failed build, I
need to check the environment.
[...]
On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 21.03.2015, at 15:50, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Which means that if unsetting X11 on in the port and not globally ocaml
is built with X11 and unison without - which poudriere will fail on
On 21.03.2015, at 19:10, Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net wrote:
On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
I recently (after last upgrade of poudriere-devel, although I do not know if
that is the cause) ran into a comparable issue with unison without X11 :
| MWN cat
Guido Falsi wrote:
Exactly.
There are four cases:
one asks for both with or without X11, works fine, in both.
This is all ok.
one asks for ocaml without X11 and unison with X11, this is wrong and
cannot obviously work.
Absolutely. But this in theory should disable X11 in unison
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/16/15 22:37,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
I never noticed this since it
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just
Hi Guido,
I saw you recently submitted net/unison240 but it depends on
lang/ocaml-nox11. This is a problem with using poudriere:
[00:00:58] Error: Duplicated origin for ocaml-nox11-4.01.0_4:
lang/ocaml-nox11 AND lang/ocaml. Rerun with -vv to see which ports are
depending on these.
Would
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
I never noticed this since it never happened to me and nobody else
reported it.
Anyway now that you draw
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile(revision 381259)
+++ Makefile
30 matches
Mail list logo
